Bridget F Grant1, Rise B Goldstein2, Sharon M Smith2, Jeesun Jung2, Haitao Zhang2, Sanchen P Chou2, Roger P Pickering2, Wenjun J Ruan2, Boji Huang2, Tulshi D Saha2, Christina Aivadyan3, Eliana Greenstein3, Deborah S Hasin4. 1. Laboratory of Epidemiology and Biometry, Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. Electronic address: bgrant@mail.nih.gov. 2. Laboratory of Epidemiology and Biometry, Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. 3. New York State Psychiatric Institute, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA. 4. New York State Psychiatric Institute, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 123, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability of substance use disorder and psychiatric modules in the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Version (AUDADIS-5). METHODS: Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for DSM-5 substance use and psychiatric disorder diagnoses and dimensional criteria scales using a test-retest design among 1006 respondents drawn from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (NESARC-III). RESULTS: Reliabilities of substance use disorder diagnoses and associated criteria scales were generally good to excellent, while reliabilities for mood, anxiety and trauma and stress-related disorders and associated scales were generally in the fair to good range. CONCLUSIONS: The observed reliability of the DSM-5 diagnoses and dimensional scales for the substance use and psychiatric disorders found in this study indicates that the AUDADIS-5 can be a useful tool in various research settings, particularly in studies of the general population, the target population for which it was designed. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability of substance use disorder and psychiatric modules in the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Version (AUDADIS-5). METHODS: Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for DSM-5 substance use and psychiatric disorder diagnoses and dimensional criteria scales using a test-retest design among 1006 respondents drawn from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (NESARC-III). RESULTS: Reliabilities of substance use disorder diagnoses and associated criteria scales were generally good to excellent, while reliabilities for mood, anxiety and trauma and stress-related disorders and associated scales were generally in the fair to good range. CONCLUSIONS: The observed reliability of the DSM-5 diagnoses and dimensional scales for the substance use and psychiatric disorders found in this study indicates that the AUDADIS-5 can be a useful tool in various research settings, particularly in studies of the general population, the target population for which it was designed. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-5; Anxiety disorders; Mood disorders; National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III; Reliability; Substance use disorders
Authors: Bridget F Grant; Deborah A Dawson; Frederick S Stinson; S Patricia Chou; Mary C Dufour; Roger P Pickering Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2004-06-11 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Bradley T Kerridge; Tulshi D Saha; S Patricia Chou; Haitao Zhang; Jeesun Jung; W June Ruan; Sharon M Smith; Boji Huang; Deborah S Hasin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Sean Esteban McCabe; Tonda L Hughes; Brady T West; Rebecca J Evans-Polce; Phil T Veliz; Kara Dickinson; Vita V McCabe; Carol J Boyd Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Chiung M Chen; Young-Hee Yoon; Thomas C Harford; Bridget F Grant Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Mark Olfson; Carlos Blanco; Melanie Wall; Shang-Min Liu; Tulshi D Saha; Roger P Pickering; Bridget F Grant Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 21.596