Literature DB >> 25594905

SCORE: a novel multi-criteria decision analysis approach to assessing the sustainability of contaminated land remediation.

Lars Rosén1, Pär-Erik Back2, Tore Söderqvist3, Jenny Norrman4, Petra Brinkhoff5, Tommy Norberg6, Yevheniya Volchko4, Malin Norin5, Magnus Bergknut7, Gernot Döberl8.   

Abstract

The multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method provides for a comprehensive and transparent basis for performing sustainability assessments. Development of a relevant MCDA-method requires consideration of a number of key issues, e.g. (a) definition of assessment boundaries, (b) definition of performance scales, both temporal and spatial, (c) selection of relevant criteria (indicators) that facilitate a comprehensive sustainability assessment while avoiding double-counting of effects, and (d) handling of uncertainties. Adding to the complexity is the typically wide variety of inputs, including quantifications based on existing data, expert judgements, and opinions expressed in interviews. The SCORE (Sustainable Choice Of REmediation) MCDA-method was developed to provide a transparent assessment of the sustainability of possible remediation alternatives for contaminated sites relative to a reference alternative, considering key criteria in the economic, environmental, and social sustainability domains. The criteria were identified based on literature studies, interviews and focus-group meetings. SCORE combines a linear additive model to rank the alternatives with a non-compensatory approach to identify alternatives regarded as non-sustainable. The key strengths of the SCORE method are as follows: a framework that at its core is designed to be flexible and transparent; the possibility to integrate both quantitative and qualitative estimations on criteria; its ability, unlike other sustainability assessment tools used in industry and academia, to allow for the alteration of boundary conditions where necessary; the inclusion of a full uncertainty analysis of the results, using Monte Carlo simulation; and a structure that allows preferences and opinions of involved stakeholders to be openly integrated into the analysis. A major insight from practical application of SCORE is that its most important contribution may be that it initiates a process where criteria otherwise likely ignored are addressed and openly discussed between stakeholders.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contaminated sites; Cost–benefit analysis; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Social sustainability; Sustainable remediation; Uncertainty analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25594905     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

1.  Green and sustainable remediation (GSR) evaluation: framework, standards, and tool. A case study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Wen-Yen Huang; Weiteng Hung; Chi Thanh Vu; Wei-Ting Chen; Jhih-Wei Lai; Chitsan Lin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  An Integrated Approach for the Environmental Characterization of a Wide Potentially Contaminated Area in Southern Italy.

Authors:  Daniela Ducci; Stefano Albanese; Lorenzo Boccia; Egidio Celentano; Elena Cervelli; Alfonso Corniello; Anna Crispo; Benedetto De Vivo; Paolo Iodice; Carmela Langella; Annamaria Lima; Maurizio Manno; Mario Palladino; Stefania Pindozzi; Marina Rigillo; Nunzio Romano; Mariangela Sellerino; Adolfo Senatore; Giuseppe Speranza; Nunzio Fiorentino; Massimo Fagnano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  A Framework for Identification, Assessment and Prioritization of Climate Change Adaptation Measures for Roads and Railways.

Authors:  Yvonne Andersson-Sköld; Lina Nordin; Erik Nyberg; Mikael Johannesson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.