J Klasen-Sansone 1 , J Bode 2 , R S Lanzman 1 , R Kubitz 2 , S Immig 2 , P Heusch 1 , G Antoch 1 , D Häussinger 2 , D Blondin 1 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential causes of Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) dysfunction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 26 patients who required TIPS revision (group I) and 24 patients who did not require any further intervention (group II) within the first two years following TIPS implantation. The distance of the distal end of the stent to the hepatocaval junction was measured. Furthermore, the angle between the stent and the portal vein (inflow) and the angle between the stent and the hepatic vein (outflow) were measured. Furthermore, the following data were evaluated: pre- and postinterventional portal pressure gradients, maximal postinterventional flow and blood values [C-reactive protein (CRP), bilirubin, glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT), glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (GPT)]. RESULTS: Compared with control subjects, patients who required TIPS revision showed a significantly longer distance from the distal end of the stent to the hepatocaval junction (I: 17.3 ± 10 mm, II: 6.7 ± 5.7 mm, p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant correlation between the above named distance and the time to revision (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.5, p = 0.01). In addition, patients with TIPS revision had a significantly larger angle of portalvenous inflow (alpha angle) than the control group (I: 100.5 ± 31.5°, II: 64.5 ± 31.6°, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results show that the distance from the end of the stent to the hepatocaval junction and the angle of portalvenous inflow are technical factors that may influence the shunt's patency rate. Of these two, the distance to the hepatocaval junction can be influenced easily by the interventionalist. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential causes of Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) dysfunction . MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 26 patients who required TIPS revision (group I) and 24 patients who did not require any further intervention (group II) within the first two years following TIPS implantation. The distance of the distal end of the stent to the hepatocaval junction was measured. Furthermore, the angle between the stent and the portal vein (inflow) and the angle between the stent and the hepatic vein (outflow) were measured. Furthermore, the following data were evaluated: pre- and postinterventional portal pressure gradients, maximal postinterventional flow and blood values [C-reactive protein (CRP ), bilirubin , glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT), glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (GPT )]. RESULTS: Compared with control subjects, patients who required TIPS revision showed a significantly longer distance from the distal end of the stent to the hepatocaval junction (I: 17.3 ± 10 mm, II: 6.7 ± 5.7 mm, p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant correlation between the above named distance and the time to revision (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.5, p = 0.01). In addition, patients with TIPS revision had a significantly larger angle of portalvenous inflow (alpha angle) than the control group (I: 100.5 ± 31.5°, II: 64.5 ± 31.6°, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results show that the distance from the end of the stent to the hepatocaval junction and the angle of portalvenous inflow are technical factors that may influence the shunt's patency rate. Of these two, the distance to the hepatocaval junction can be influenced easily by the interventionalist. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Gene
Species
Mesh： See more »
Year: 2015
PMID： 25594704 DOI： 10.1055/s-0034-1385430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Z Gastroenterol ISSN： 0044-2771 Impact factor: 2.000