Literature DB >> 25594620

Uterine artery pulsatility index in the three trimesters of pregnancy: effects of maternal characteristics and medical history.

A Tayyar1, L Guerra1, A Wright2, D Wright2, K H Nicolaides1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define the contribution of maternal variables that influence the measured uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) in screening for pregnancy complications.
METHODS: Maternal characteristics and medical history were recorded, and UtA-PI was measured, in women with a singleton pregnancy attending for three routine hospital visits at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks, 19 + 0 to 24 + 6 weeks and 30 + 0 to 34 + 6 weeks or 35 + 0 to 37 + 6 weeks' gestation. For pregnancies delivering phenotypically normal live births or stillbirths at ≥ 24 weeks' gestation, variables from maternal demographic characteristics and medical history that are important in the prediction of UtA-PI were determined from linear mixed-effects multiple regression.
RESULTS: UtA-PI was measured in 90 484 cases in the first trimester, 66 862 cases in the second trimester and 33 470 cases in the third trimester of pregnancy. Significant independent contributions to UtA-PI were provided by gestational age, maternal age, weight, racial origin and a history of pre-eclampsia (PE) in the previous pregnancy. Random-effects multiple regression analysis was used to define the contribution of maternal variables that influence the measured UtA-PI and express the values as multiples of the median (MoM). The model was shown to provide an adequate fit of MoM values for all covariates both in pregnancies that developed PE and in those that did not.
CONCLUSIONS: A model was fitted to express the measured UtA-PI as MoMs after adjustment for variables from maternal characteristics and medical history that affect this measurement.
Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  first-trimester screening; pre-eclampsia; pyramid of pregnancy care; second-trimester screening; third-trimester screening; uterine artery Doppler

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25594620     DOI: 10.1002/uog.14789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  10 in total

1.  The use of ultrasound and other markers for early detection of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Neil O'Gorman; Kypros H Nicolaides; Liona C Y Poon
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-22

2.  Endometriosis and Impaired Placentation: A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Uterine Arteries Doppler Pulsatility Index in Pregnancies of Patients with and without Moderate-Severe Disease.

Authors:  Noemi Salmeri; Antonio Farina; Massimo Candiani; Carolina Dolci; Giulia Bonavina; Caterina Poziello; Paola Viganò; Paolo Ivo Cavoretto
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-19

Review 3.  First trimester prediction of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Ulrik Dolberg Anderson; Magnus Gram; Bo Åkerström; Stefan R Hansson
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Prenatal air pollution exposure, smoking, and uterine vascular resistance.

Authors:  Zuelma A Contreras; Julia E Heck; Pei-Chen Lee; Xin Cui; Calvin J Hobel; Carla Janzen; Fred Lurmann; Beate Ritz
Journal:  Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2018-06-21

5.  A data-driven model to study utero-ovarian blood flow physiology during pregnancy.

Authors:  Jason Carson; Michael Lewis; Dareyoush Rassi; Raoul Van Loon
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2019-03-05

6.  Sex differences in uterine artery Doppler during gestation in pregnancies complicated by placental dysfunction.

Authors:  Leah Paranavitana; Melissa Walker; Anjana Ravi Chandran; Natasha Milligan; Shiri Shinar; Clare L Whitehead; Sebastian R Hobson; Lena Serghides; W Tony Parks; Ahmet A Baschat; Christopher K Macgowan; John G Sled; John C Kingdom; Lindsay S Cahill
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 5.027

Review 7.  A Review of Roles of Uterine Artery Doppler in Pregnancy Complications.

Authors:  Yingying Tian; Xiuhua Yang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-03

8.  Effectiveness of Different Algorithms and Cut-off Value in Preeclampsia First Trimester Screening.

Authors:  Piotr Tousty; Bartosz Czuba; Dariusz Borowski; Magda Fraszczyk-Tousty; Sylwia Dzidek; Ewa Kwiatkowska; Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska; Andrzej Torbé; Sebastian Kwiatkowski
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2022-04-08

9.  Preeclampsia risk prediction model for Chinese pregnant women (ChiPERM): research protocol for a randomized stepped-wedge cluster trial.

Authors:  Qiongjie Zhou; Jinghui Xu; Yu Xiong; Xiaotian Li
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.105

10.  Towards Transabdominal Functional Photoacoustic Imaging of the Placenta: Improvement in Imaging Depth Through Optimization of Light Delivery.

Authors:  Kristie Huda; Kenneth F Swan; Cecilia T Gambala; Gabriella C Pridjian; Carolyn L Bayer
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.934

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.