Ziggi Ivan Santini1, Ai Koyanagi2, Stefanos Tyrovolas2, Catherine Mason3, Josep Maria Haro2. 1. Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu/CIBERSAM, Dr Antoni Pujades, 42, 08830, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: z.santini@pssjd.org. 2. Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu/CIBERSAM, Dr Antoni Pujades, 42, 08830, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. 3. Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, Academic Unit Psychology, Building 44, Highfield Campus, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Depression is one of the most prevalent mental disorders globally and has implications for various aspects of everyday-life. To date, studies assessing the association between social relationships and depression have provided conflicting results. The aim of this paper was to review the evidence on associations between social relationships and depression in the general population. METHODS: Studies investigating the association of social support, social networks, or social connectedness with depression were retrieved and summarized (searches using Pubmed, ScienceDirect, PsycNet were conducted in May 2014). RESULTS: Fifty-one studies were included in this review. The strongest and most consistent findings were significant protective effects of perceived emotional support, perceived instrumental support, and large, diverse social networks. Little evidence was found on whether social connectedness is related to depression, as was also the case for negative interactions. LIMITATIONS: Due to the strict inclusion criteria relating to study quality and the availability of papers in the domain of interest, the review did not capture 'gray literature' and qualitative studies. CONCLUSION: Future research is warranted to account for potential bias introduced by the use of subjective measures as compared to objective measures of received support and actual networks. Due to the heterogeneity between available studies on the measure of social relationships, the inclusion of comparable measures across studies would allow for more valid comparisons. In addition, well-designed prospective studies will provide more insight into causality. Future research should address how social support and networks interact and together affect risks for depression. Social connectedness and negative interactions appear to be underutilized as measures in population-based studies.
BACKGROUND:Depression is one of the most prevalent mental disorders globally and has implications for various aspects of everyday-life. To date, studies assessing the association between social relationships and depression have provided conflicting results. The aim of this paper was to review the evidence on associations between social relationships and depression in the general population. METHODS: Studies investigating the association of social support, social networks, or social connectedness with depression were retrieved and summarized (searches using Pubmed, ScienceDirect, PsycNet were conducted in May 2014). RESULTS: Fifty-one studies were included in this review. The strongest and most consistent findings were significant protective effects of perceived emotional support, perceived instrumental support, and large, diverse social networks. Little evidence was found on whether social connectedness is related to depression, as was also the case for negative interactions. LIMITATIONS: Due to the strict inclusion criteria relating to study quality and the availability of papers in the domain of interest, the review did not capture 'gray literature' and qualitative studies. CONCLUSION: Future research is warranted to account for potential bias introduced by the use of subjective measures as compared to objective measures of received support and actual networks. Due to the heterogeneity between available studies on the measure of social relationships, the inclusion of comparable measures across studies would allow for more valid comparisons. In addition, well-designed prospective studies will provide more insight into causality. Future research should address how social support and networks interact and together affect risks for depression. Social connectedness and negative interactions appear to be underutilized as measures in population-based studies.
Authors: Joan Domènech-Abella; Elvira Lara; Maria Rubio-Valera; Beatriz Olaya; Maria Victoria Moneta; Laura Alejandra Rico-Uribe; Jose Luis Ayuso-Mateos; Jordi Mundó; Josep Maria Haro Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: R H S van den Brink; N Schutter; D J C Hanssen; B M Elzinga; I M Rabeling-Keus; M L Stek; H C Comijs; B W J H Penninx; R C Oude Voshaar Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 6.892
Authors: Carl A Latkin; Hong Van Tieu; Sheldon Fields; Brett S Hanscom; Matt Connor; Brett Hanscom; Sophia A Hussen; Hyman M Scott; Matthew J Mimiaga; Leo Wilton; Manya Magnus; Iris Chen; Beryl A Koblin Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-04
Authors: Jason I Chen; Elizabeth R Hooker; Meike Niederhausen; Heather E Marsh; Somnath Saha; Steven K Dobscha; Alan R Teo Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 4.328