| Literature DB >> 25594441 |
Roshan T Ramlal1, Martin Tembo2, Caroline C King3, Sascha Ellington4, Alice Soko5, Maggie Chigwenembe6, Charles Chasela7, Denise J Jamieson8, Charles van der Horst9, Margaret Bentley10, Linda Adair11.
Abstract
Diet is a modifiable factor that can contribute to the health of pregnant women. In a sample of 577 HIV-positive pregnant women who completed baseline interviews for the Breastfeeding, Antiretrovirals, and Nutrition Study in Lilongwe, Malawi, cluster analysis was used to derive dietary patterns. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify associations between the dietary patterns and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), arm muscle area (AMA), arm fat area (AFA), and hemoglobin at baseline. Three key dietary patterns were identified: animal-based, plant-based, and grain-based. Women with relatively greater wealth were more likely to consume the animal-based diet, which had the highest intake of energy, protein, and fat and was associated with higher hemoglobin levels compared to the other diets. Women with the lowest wealth were more likely to consume the grain-based diet with the lowest intake of energy, protein, fat, and iron and were more likely to have lower AFA than women on the animal-based and plant-based diets, but higher AMA compared to women on the animal-based diet. Pregnant, HIV-infected women in Malawi could benefit from nutritional support to ensure greater nutrient diversity during pregnancy, when women face increased nutrient demands to support fetal growth and development.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25594441 PMCID: PMC4303855 DOI: 10.3390/nu7010584
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Baseline demographics, nutritional status, caloric intake, and clinical characteristics among 577 pregnant women participating in the BAN Study.
| Characteristic | |
|---|---|
| Age (year) [mean ± SD] 1 | 25.9 ± 4.9 |
| No school (%) | 11.3 |
| Primary (%) | 52.8 |
| Secondary or higher (%) | 35.9 |
| Unemployed (%) | 81.3 |
| Employed (%) | 18.7 |
| None (%) | 39.7 |
| Some (%) | 14.6 |
| All (%) | 45.7 |
| Parity (live births) [mean ± SD] | 1.7 ± 1.3 |
| Gestational age (weeks) [mean ± SD] | 25.2 ± 5.4 |
| CD4 count (cells/uL) [range (IQR) 2] | 442 (325–601) |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) [mean ± SD] | 10.8 ± 1.2 |
| Daily energy total intake (kcal) [mean ± SD] | 1378 ± 821 |
| Mid-upper arm circumference (cm) [mean ± SD] | 26.4 ± 2.6 |
| Arm muscle area (cm2) [mean ± SD] | 36.6 ± 6.4 |
| Arm fat area (cm2) [mean ± SD] | 19.5 ± 7.8 |
1 SD: standard deviation; 2 IQR: interquartile range.
Figure 1Cluster analysis of dietary patterns among HIV-infected Malawian pregnant women.
Demographic, nutrient, and clinical indicators by the 3 diet clusters among 577 pregnant women participating in the BAN Study.
| Indicators | Animal-Based 1 ( | Grain-based 2,3 ( | Plant-based 4 ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Animal | Animal | Grain | ||||
| Age (year) (mean ± SD) | 25.0 ± 4.4 | 26.2 ± 5.1 | 26.2 ± 4.9 | - | - | - |
| No school ( | 11 (6.9) | 37 (14.5) | 17 (10.4) | - | - | - |
| Lowest wealth index ( | 17 (15.7) | 63 (58.3) | 28 (25.9) | 0.001 | - | - |
| Parity > 2 ( | 23(14.3) | 67 (26.4) | 43 (26.3) | 0.014 | - | - |
| Any famine season exposure ( | 83 (51.9) | 180 (70.9) | 85 (51.2) | <0.001 | - | <0.001 |
| Daily energy total intake (kcal) | 1776.8 ± 859.5 | 1083.5 ± 672.2 | 1445.4 ± 818.5 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Carbohydrates (g/day) | 195.8 ± 116.3 | 201.1 ± 128.9 | 237.4 ± 135.3 | - | 0.010 | 0.014 |
| Protein (g/day) | 69.3 ± 57.1 | 32.6 ± 28.3 | 47.1 ± 35.9 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 |
| Total fat (g/day) | 82.9 ± 51.2 | 19.9 ± 18.5 | 41.2 ± 43.8 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Iron (g/day) | 10.1 ± 9.9 | 6.9 ± 5.9 | 11.3 ± 8.4 | <0.001 | - | <0.001 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 11.0 ± 1.1 | 10.7 ± 1.2 | 10.7 ± 1.1 | 0.017 | - | - |
| MUAC (cm) | 26.3 ± 2.7 | 26.3 ± 2.6 | 26.8 ± 2.6 | - | - | - |
| AMA (cm2) | 35.3 ± 6.2 | 37.3 ± 6.5 | 37.0 ± 6.3 | 0.007 | - | - |
| AFA (cm2) | 20.2 ± 8.0 | 18.7 ± 7.0 | 20.7 ± 8.5 | - | - | 0.003 |
| Infant weight at delivery (g) | 3058.6 ± 431.4 | 2976.9 ± 434.4 | 3053.9 ± 395.2 | - | - | - |
1 Food pattern of high fish, meat and oil; 2 Food pattern of high grain and grain-derived foods; 3 Food or food group contributed the relatively lowest mean intake across the 3 clusters; 4 Food pattern of high leafy vegetables, nuts, tubers, fruits; 5 Determined by t tests or chi-square tests (values p < 0.017, Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons); 6 CD4 and maternal work status are not included in the table because no significant differences were found when comparing across three clusters (i.e., global p-value > 0.05).
Predicted mean difference in arm muscle area (AMA), arm fat area (AFA), and hemoglobin level (Hb) of women in the three clusters of dietary patterns.
| Outcome | Mean Difference | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grain (compared to animal) | 1.86 | 0.53 | 3.19 | 0.01 |
| Plant (compared to animal) | 1.23 | −0.14 | 2.60 | 0.08 |
| Plant (compared to grain) | −0.63 | −1.89 | 0.63 | 0.33 |
| Grain (compared to animal) | −2.09 | −3.75 | −0.44 | 0.01 |
| Plant (compared to animal) | 0.38 | −1.33 | 2.08 | 0.67 |
| Plant (compared to grain) | 2.47 | 0.90 | 4.03 | <0.01 |
| Grain (compared to animal) | −0.27 | −0.52 | −0.01 | 0.04 |
| Plant (compared to animal) | −0.32 | −0.59 | −0.07 | 0.01 |
| Plant (compared to grain) | −0.06 | −0.30 | 0.18 | 0.62 |
1 Adjusted for total energy intake, season, age, parity, education, wealth index, maternal employment status, height and CD4 count.