Literature DB >> 25594140

Self-reported distress in patients with ovarian cancer: is it related to disease status?

Floortje K Ploos van Amstel1, Maaike A P C van Ham, Esmee J Peters, Judith B Prins, Petronella B Ottevanger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer have a poor prognosis and often undergo intensive treatment. These patients are therefore at risk for experiencing distress and reduced quality of life. The aim of this study was to explore the self-reported distress severity, experienced problems, and quality of life in relation to their disease status.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2011 at a University Medical Center. Women with ovarian cancer (n = 273), both during and after treatment, were asked by mail to fill in self-report questionnaires. Distress was measured using with the Distress Thermometer (DT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Impact of Event Scale. Problems and quality of life were assessed with the problem list of the DT, and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C-30 and OV28.
RESULTS: The questionnaire data of 104 patients were analyzed. Screening with the DT revealed distress in 32% [mean (SD), 3.1 (2.6)]. Distress was found with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in 14% [8.6 (5.9)] and with the Impact of Event Scale in 18% of the patients [17.5 (15.5)]. No significant differences were found in distress severity and self-reported problems between patients with and without recurrence. In both groups, the problems fatigue, condition, and neuropathy were most reported. Patients with distress (DT ≥ 5) experienced significantly worse functioning, more problems, and lower quality of life than patients without distress (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that disease status in patients with ovarian cancer seems to have no influence on distress, quality of life, and the problems encountered. However, distressed patients experienced more problems, with physical and emotional functioning, and had lower quality of life. The problems fatigue, physical condition, and neuropathy are the most prevailing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25594140     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  5 in total

1.  Acceptance, social support, benefit-finding, and depression in women with gynecological cancer.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Deborah A Kashy; Shannon Virtue; Kevin R Criswell; David W Kissane; Melissa Ozga; Carolyn J Heckman; Jerod Stapleton; Lorna Rodriguez
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Consequences of gynecological cancer in patients and their partners from the sexual and psychological perspective.

Authors:  Dariusz Iżycki; Katarzyna Woźniak; Natalia Iżycka
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2016-07-22

3.  Impact of Recurrence of Ovarian Cancer on Quality of Life and Outlook for the Future.

Authors:  Nicoletta Colombo; Domenica Lorusso; Paolo Scollo
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  The effectiveness of a nurse-led intervention with the distress thermometer for patients treated with curative intent for breast cancer: design of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Floortje K Ploos van Amstel; Judith B Prins; Winette T A van der Graaf; Marlies E W J Peters; Petronella B Ottevanger
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  "Health in the Mirror": An Unconventional Approach to Unmet Psychological Needs in Oncology.

Authors:  Valentina E Di Mattei; Letizia Carnelli; Paola Taranto; Martina Bernardi; Chiara Brombin; Federica Cugnata; Angela Noviello; Morag Currin; Giorgia Mangili; Emanuela Rabaiotti; Lucio Sarno; Massimo Candiani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.