| Literature DB >> 25593684 |
Reza Narenji Sani1, Parviz Tajik1, Mohammad Hassan Yousefi2, Mansoureh Movahedin3, Babak Qasemi-Panahi4, Shiva Shafiei1, Mahmood Ahmadi Hamedani2.
Abstract
The complex process of spermatogenesis is regulated by various factors. Studies on spermatogonial stem cells (SCCs) have provided very important tool to improve herd genetic and different field. 0.2 to 0.3 percent of total cells of seminiferous tubules is consist of spermatogonial stem cells. To investigate and biomanipulation of these cells, proliferation and viability rate of cells should be increased in vitro, at first. Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) has been suggested to play a determinant role in the survival of germ cells in addition to increasing spermatogonial proliferation. In this study, the in vitro effects of FSH on spermatogonial cell colony formation were investigated. Sertoli and spermatogonial cells were isolated from 3-5 months old calves. The identity of the Sertoli cells and spermatogonial stem cells were confirmed through immunocytochemistry and colony morphology, respectively. Co-cultured Sertoli and spermatogonial cells were treated with FSH in different dose of 10, 20 and 40 IU mL(-1) FSH, before colony assay. Results indicated that, FSH increased in vitro colonization of spermatogonial cells in comparison with control group. In conclusion, using FSH provided proper bovine spermatogonial stem cell culture medium for in vitro study of these cells.Entities:
Keywords: Bovine; Co-culture; FSH; SSCs; Sertoli
Year: 2013 PMID: 25593684 PMCID: PMC4293895
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res Forum ISSN: 2008-8140 Impact factor: 1.054
Fig. 1A. Sertoli cells that created a monolayer of cells. B. The morphology of a spermatogonial derived colony that formed from co-cultured spermatogonial cells on a monolayer of Sertoli cells, 200×.
Fig. 2Immunocytochemical staining of bovine Sertoli cell with anti-vimentin conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate, 1000×.
Comparison of colony numbers between control and experimental groups at different times. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 14.00 ± 3.74 | 19.60 ± 6.65 | 21.20 ± 6.38 | 20.60 ± 7.09 |
|
| 23.20 ± 15.40 | 62.00 ± 26.76 | 71.62 ± 7.78 | 55.20 ± 23.41 |
|
| 31.20 ± 26.18 | 53.20 ± 27.92 | 71.40 ± 22.43 | 55.20 ± 21.06 |
|
| 30.40 ± 25.20 | 55.20 ± 31.58 | 75.20 ± 17.71 | 56.00 ± 32.55 |
The value with different letter significantly differ within column (p <0.05).
Comparison of colony surface area (mm2) between control and experimental groups at different times. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 135.72 ± 87.04 | 202.88 ± 15.22 | 195.08 ± 18.46 | 163.52 ± 83.28 |
|
| 69.84 ± 65.11 | 94.10 ± 10.06 | 66.00 ± 51.90 | 68.74 ± 14.39 |
|
| 69.60 ± 54.37 | 101.74 ± 13.46 | 47.14 ± 6.46 | 68.26 ± 13.10 |
|
| 71.40 ± 68.49 | 95.34 ± 11.07 | 52.40 ± 19.10 | 86.08 ± 21.34 |
The value with different letter significantly differ within column (p <0.05).
Comparison of viability rate between control and experimental groups at the end of co-culture
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 85.70% | |||
|
| 95.60% | |||
|
| 85.40% | |||
|
| 95.10% |
There is no significant difference between groups.