Literature DB >> 25593597

Host genes and their effect on the intestinal microbiome garden.

Jonathan Jacobs1, Jonathan Braun2.   

Abstract

We are only beginning to understand the relationship between host genetics and the gut microbiome. Two recent studies help to disentangle this interaction and show that genetic loci across the human genome shape the gut microbiome. This opens the possibility that an unexpected number of genetic factors act directly on microbial composition and function to modulate immune pathways and metabolic phenotypes in host physiology and disease.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25593597      PMCID: PMC4295476          DOI: 10.1186/s13073-014-0119-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Med        ISSN: 1756-994X            Impact factor:   11.117


Association of host genetics and the microbiome

The small intestine and colon house a complex bacterial ecosystem that plays a critical role in host metabolism and immunity. Variation in the microbiome within human populations may influence susceptibility to diseases such as obesity and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), motivating efforts to understand the determinants of the composition of the intestinal microbiome. There is extensive literature on the effects of diet, antibiotic exposure, colonization history and other environmental factors. Whether host genetics also influences the microbiome is of growing interest; two recent studies, one by Goodrich et al. in Cell [1] and the other by Knights et al. in Genome Medicine [2], have addressed this question. It was already known that microbial composition is altered when genes that encode host mechanisms for microbial sensing and effector functions were knocked out in mouse models [3]. Other studies had also shown that genetic disruption of host microbial regulation in animals can induce susceptibility to colitis or metabolic syndrome. This susceptibility is transmissible via the microbiome, demonstrating the relevance of gene-microbe interactions to human health [4,5]. In humans, it is unclear whether genetic variation in human populations contributes to the inter-individual diversity in the human intestinal microbiome. This question can been addressed by evaluating whether the composition of the microbiome is more similar between monozygotic twin pairs than between dizygotic twin pairs, an approach that controls for shared environmental factors. Two early studies using high-throughput 16S sequencing reported no difference in microbial similarity between monozygotic twins compared with dizygotic twins using a phylogenetic similarity measure [6,7]. However, these studies had low power due to a limited number of twin pairs (54 or fewer) and global endpoints of microbial composition (for example, principal component analysis), leaving the issue open to debate. In this issue of Genome Medicine, Knights et al. present a systematic analysis of the effect of 154 IBD-associated polymorphisms on microbial composition in three cohorts of patients with IBD (152 to 162 patients in each cohort) [2]. The authors created multivariate linear models incorporating the IBD-associated polymorphisms and various clinical metadata to predict the abundance of bacterial taxa present in at least 75% of samples. Genetic variants associated with altered taxa abundance in one cohort were then cross-compared to the other two cohorts to determine if the directionality of change was conserved across cohorts. A total of 49 IBD-associated genes, representing nearly a third of the known IBD-associated genes, affected microbial taxa in a concordant manner in at least two of the cohorts. Three Reactome pathways were enriched in these genes: innate immune response, inflammatory response and the JAK-STAT cascade. These findings are consistent with animal studies demonstrating that perturbation in immune function can greatly influence microbial composition. The six known disease-associated variants of NOD2, an intracellular sensor of bacterial products, were combined in a separate analysis. They were found to influence overall microbial composition and the abundance of Enterobacteriaceae. Although NOD2 was one of the strongest microbiome-associated genetic variants, in linear models it had a modest effect relative to clinical metadata, such as antibiotic usage. This suggests that the influence of genetics is likely to be highly specific and requires careful study design to separate it from the many environmental influences on the microbiome.

A heritable taxon protective against obesity

These concepts are echoed in a structurally distinct study by Goodrich et al. in the November issue of Cell, which analyzed a host genomic input on fecal microbial composition, utilizing the power of twin studies (TwinsUK cohort;171 monozygotic twin pairs and 245 dizygotic twin pairs) [1]. The increased statistical power compared with earlier twin studies allowed the authors to identify a statistically significant increased similarity in microbial composition within monozygotic twin pairs compared with dizygotic twin pairs. Moreover, the effect of genetics was found to be stronger for some bacterial families than others. Among the three dominant families, Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae composition were significantly more similar within monozygotic twin pairs whereas Bacteroidaceae composition did not differ between twin types. The most highly heritable family was Christensenellaceae, which correlated strongly with several other taxa, including Methanobacteriaceae, which were also highly heritable. This network was enriched in lean individuals compared with obese individuals, suggesting the existence of a heritable consortium of bacteria that protect against obesity. Human microbial reconstitution studies using germ-free mice confirmed the predicted association of Christensenellaceae colonization with the lean phenotype.

Genotype-microbiome interaction to disease phenotype: a complex interplay

The findings of Goodrich et al. suggest that heritable susceptibility to diseases such as obesity may be partially attributable to genetic factors that change the microbiome, although the specific common genetic variants in the human population that influence the microbiome remain unknown. Knights et al. successfully tackled this issue by identifying 49 IBD-associated polymorphisms that were correlated with microbial composition in some of their IBD cohorts. Indeed, many of the 163 known IBD genetic risk loci are involved in host-microbe interactions [8]. Existing studies of candidate IBD-associated genetic variants have identified alterations in the intestinal microbiome in individuals carrying polymorphisms in NOD2 and FUT2, an enzyme that fucosylates mucus glycoproteins [9,10]. The challenge now is to clarify if these variants contribute to disease phenotype through their direct influence on microbiome selection, whose products in turn elicit the disease phenotype. This question can be addressed by determining if genetic polymorphisms concordantly affect microbial composition in healthy individuals. Considerable further work will be required to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the observed genetic associations with microbial composition in these two studies. This will entail large-scale genome-wide association studies in both healthy individuals and individuals with microbiome-associated disease, similar to the study by Knights et al., paired with validation using gene-targeted and human gnotobiotic mice. Such investigations will not only aid our understanding of human disease, but could unmask microbes such as Christensenella minuta that are relevant to human health and could be manipulated for therapeutic purposes.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Immune and genetic gardening of the intestinal microbiome.

Authors:  Jonathan P Jacobs; Jonathan Braun
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  Metabolic syndrome and altered gut microbiota in mice lacking Toll-like receptor 5.

Authors:  Matam Vijay-Kumar; Jesse D Aitken; Frederic A Carvalho; Tyler C Cullender; Simon Mwangi; Shanthi Srinivasan; Shanthi V Sitaraman; Rob Knight; Ruth E Ley; Andrew T Gewirtz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Human genetics shape the gut microbiome.

Authors:  Julia K Goodrich; Jillian L Waters; Angela C Poole; Jessica L Sutter; Omry Koren; Ran Blekhman; Michelle Beaumont; William Van Treuren; Rob Knight; Jordana T Bell; Timothy D Spector; Andrew G Clark; Ruth E Ley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  NLRP6 inflammasome regulates colonic microbial ecology and risk for colitis.

Authors:  Eran Elinav; Till Strowig; Andrew L Kau; Jorge Henao-Mejia; Christoph A Thaiss; Carmen J Booth; David R Peaper; John Bertin; Stephanie C Eisenbarth; Jeffrey I Gordon; Richard A Flavell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Inflammatory bowel diseases phenotype, C. difficile and NOD2 genotype are associated with shifts in human ileum associated microbial composition.

Authors:  Ellen Li; Christina M Hamm; Ajay S Gulati; R Balfour Sartor; Hongyan Chen; Xiao Wu; Tianyi Zhang; F James Rohlf; Wei Zhu; Chi Gu; Charles E Robertson; Norman R Pace; Edgar C Boedeker; Noam Harpaz; Jeffrey Yuan; George M Weinstock; Erica Sodergren; Daniel N Frank
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography.

Authors:  Tanya Yatsunenko; Federico E Rey; Mark J Manary; Indi Trehan; Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello; Monica Contreras; Magda Magris; Glida Hidalgo; Robert N Baldassano; Andrey P Anokhin; Andrew C Heath; Barbara Warner; Jens Reeder; Justin Kuczynski; J Gregory Caporaso; Catherine A Lozupone; Christian Lauber; Jose Carlos Clemente; Dan Knights; Rob Knight; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Reprograming of gut microbiome energy metabolism by the FUT2 Crohn's disease risk polymorphism.

Authors:  Maomeng Tong; Ian McHardy; Paul Ruegger; Maryam Goudarzi; Purna C Kashyap; Talin Haritunians; Xiaoxiao Li; Thomas G Graeber; Emma Schwager; Curtis Huttenhower; Albert J Fornace; Justin L Sonnenburg; Dermot P B McGovern; James Borneman; Jonathan Braun
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Luke Jostins; Stephan Ripke; Rinse K Weersma; Richard H Duerr; Dermot P McGovern; Ken Y Hui; James C Lee; L Philip Schumm; Yashoda Sharma; Carl A Anderson; Jonah Essers; Mitja Mitrovic; Kaida Ning; Isabelle Cleynen; Emilie Theatre; Sarah L Spain; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Philippe Goyette; Zhi Wei; Clara Abraham; Jean-Paul Achkar; Tariq Ahmad; Leila Amininejad; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Vibeke Andersen; Jane M Andrews; Leonard Baidoo; Tobias Balschun; Peter A Bampton; Alain Bitton; Gabrielle Boucher; Stephan Brand; Carsten Büning; Ariella Cohain; Sven Cichon; Mauro D'Amato; Dirk De Jong; Kathy L Devaney; Marla Dubinsky; Cathryn Edwards; David Ellinghaus; Lynnette R Ferguson; Denis Franchimont; Karin Fransen; Richard Gearry; Michel Georges; Christian Gieger; Jürgen Glas; Talin Haritunians; Ailsa Hart; Chris Hawkey; Matija Hedl; Xinli Hu; Tom H Karlsen; Limas Kupcinskas; Subra Kugathasan; Anna Latiano; Debby Laukens; Ian C Lawrance; Charlie W Lees; Edouard Louis; Gillian Mahy; John Mansfield; Angharad R Morgan; Craig Mowat; William Newman; Orazio Palmieri; Cyriel Y Ponsioen; Uros Potocnik; Natalie J Prescott; Miguel Regueiro; Jerome I Rotter; Richard K Russell; Jeremy D Sanderson; Miquel Sans; Jack Satsangi; Stefan Schreiber; Lisa A Simms; Jurgita Sventoraityte; Stephan R Targan; Kent D Taylor; Mark Tremelling; Hein W Verspaget; Martine De Vos; Cisca Wijmenga; David C Wilson; Juliane Winkelmann; Ramnik J Xavier; Sebastian Zeissig; Bin Zhang; Clarence K Zhang; Hongyu Zhao; Mark S Silverberg; Vito Annese; Hakon Hakonarson; Steven R Brant; Graham Radford-Smith; Christopher G Mathew; John D Rioux; Eric E Schadt; Mark J Daly; Andre Franke; Miles Parkes; Severine Vermeire; Jeffrey C Barrett; Judy H Cho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins.

Authors:  Peter J Turnbaugh; Micah Hamady; Tanya Yatsunenko; Brandi L Cantarel; Alexis Duncan; Ruth E Ley; Mitchell L Sogin; William J Jones; Bruce A Roe; Jason P Affourtit; Michael Egholm; Bernard Henrissat; Andrew C Heath; Rob Knight; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 49.962

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  Microbial, metabolomic, and immunologic dynamics in a relapsing genetic mouse model of colitis induced by T-synthase deficiency.

Authors:  Jonathan P Jacobs; Lin Lin; Maryam Goudarzi; Paul Ruegger; Dermot P B McGovern; Albert J Fornace; James Borneman; Lijun Xia; Jonathan Braun
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2016-11-22

Review 2.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Microbial Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

Authors:  Marla Dubinsky; Jonathan Braun
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Gut microbiota and allogeneic transplantation.

Authors:  Weilin Wang; Shaoyan Xu; Zhigang Ren; Jianwen Jiang; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 4.  The relationship between sex hormones, the vaginal microbiome and immunity in HIV-1 susceptibility in women.

Authors:  Jocelyn M Wessels; Allison M Felker; Haley A Dupont; Charu Kaushic
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 5.758

Review 5.  β-Defensins: Farming the Microbiome for Homeostasis and Health.

Authors:  Kieran G Meade; Cliona O'Farrelly
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Assembling microbial communities: a genomic analysis of a natural experiment in neotropical bamboo internodes.

Authors:  Sonia Ahluwalia; Iris Holmes; Rudolf von May; Daniel L Rabosky; Alison R Davis Rabosky
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.061

7.  Metabolically similar cohorts of bacteria exhibit strong cooccurrence patterns with diet items and eukaryotic microbes in lizard guts.

Authors:  Iris A Holmes; Ivan V Monagan; Daniel L Rabosky; Alison R Davis Rabosky
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.