Ryan W Gan1, Leendert A Trouw1, Jing Shi1, René E M Toes1, Tom W J Huizinga1, M Kristen Demoruelle1, Jason R Kolfenbach1, Gary O Zerbe1, Kevin D Deane1, Jess D Edison1, William R Gilliland1, Jill M Norris1, V Michael Holers2. 1. From the Colorado School of Public Health; Division of Rheumatology, University of Colorado Aurora, Colorado; Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; and the Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.R.W. Gan, MPH; G.O. Zerbe, PhD; J.M. Norris, PhD, Colorado School of Public Health; L.A. Trouw, PhD; J. Shi; R.E.M. Toes, PhD; T.W.J. Huizinga, MD; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; M.K. Demoruelle, MD; J.R. Kolfenbach, MD; K.D. Deane, MD; V.M. Holers, MD, Division of Rheumatology, University of Colorado; J.D. Edison, MD; W.R. Gilliland, MD, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. 2. From the Colorado School of Public Health; Division of Rheumatology, University of Colorado Aurora, Colorado; Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; and the Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.R.W. Gan, MPH; G.O. Zerbe, PhD; J.M. Norris, PhD, Colorado School of Public Health; L.A. Trouw, PhD; J. Shi; R.E.M. Toes, PhD; T.W.J. Huizinga, MD; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; M.K. Demoruelle, MD; J.R. Kolfenbach, MD; K.D. Deane, MD; V.M. Holers, MD, Division of Rheumatology, University of Colorado; J.D. Edison, MD; W.R. Gilliland, MD, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. Michael.Holers@ucdenver.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies could further elucidate early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pathogenesis and predict clinical disease. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of anti-CarP antibodies for future RA to other RA-related antibodies in military personnel. METHODS: Stored pre-RA diagnosis serum samples from 76 RA cases were tested for anti-CarP fetal calf serum (FCS), anti-CarP fibrinogen (Fib), anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies version 2 (anti-CCP2), rheumatoid factor-nephelometry (RF-Neph), and RF isotypes [immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG, and IgA]. Positivity for all antibodies was determined as ≥ 2 SD of log-transformed means from controls. Relationships between autoantibodies and future RA were assessed in prediagnosis serum for all RA cases compared to controls using sensitivity, specificity, and logistic regression. Differences in diagnostic accuracy between antibody combinations were assessed using comparisons of area under the curves (AUC). RESULTS: Anti-CarP-FCS was 26% sensitive and 95% specific for future RA, whereas anti-CarP-Fib was 16% sensitive and 95% specific for future RA. Anti-CarP-FCS positivity was associated with future RA, while anti-CarP-Fib trended toward association. The antibody combination of anti-CCP2 and/or ≥ 2 RF (RF-Neph and/or RF-isotypes) resulted in an AUC of 0.72 for future RA, where the AUC was 0.71 with the addition of anti-CarP-FCS to this prior combination. CONCLUSION: Adding anti-CarP-FCS to antibody combinations did not improve AUC. However, anti-CarP-FCS was associated with future onset of RA, and was present in prediagnosis serum in ∼10% of RA cases negative for anti-CCP2 but positive for RF.
OBJECTIVE: Anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies could further elucidate early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pathogenesis and predict clinical disease. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of anti-CarP antibodies for future RA to other RA-related antibodies in military personnel. METHODS: Stored pre-RA diagnosis serum samples from 76 RA cases were tested for anti-CarP fetal calf serum (FCS), anti-CarPfibrinogen (Fib), anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies version 2 (anti-CCP2), rheumatoid factor-nephelometry (RF-Neph), and RF isotypes [immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG, and IgA]. Positivity for all antibodies was determined as ≥ 2 SD of log-transformed means from controls. Relationships between autoantibodies and future RA were assessed in prediagnosis serum for all RA cases compared to controls using sensitivity, specificity, and logistic regression. Differences in diagnostic accuracy between antibody combinations were assessed using comparisons of area under the curves (AUC). RESULTS: Anti-CarP-FCS was 26% sensitive and 95% specific for future RA, whereas anti-CarP-Fib was 16% sensitive and 95% specific for future RA. Anti-CarP-FCS positivity was associated with future RA, while anti-CarP-Fib trended toward association. The antibody combination of anti-CCP2 and/or ≥ 2 RF (RF-Neph and/or RF-isotypes) resulted in an AUC of 0.72 for future RA, where the AUC was 0.71 with the addition of anti-CarP-FCS to this prior combination. CONCLUSION: Adding anti-CarP-FCS to antibody combinations did not improve AUC. However, anti-CarP-FCS was associated with future onset of RA, and was present in prediagnosis serum in ∼10% of RA cases negative for anti-CCP2 but positive for RF.
Authors: P C E Hissink Muller; J Anink; J Shi; E W N Levarht; T H C M Reinards; M H Otten; M J D van Tol; C M Jol-van der Zijde; D M C Brinkman; C F Allaart; E P Hoppenreijs; Y Koopman-Keemink; S S M Kamphuis; K Dolman; J M van den Berg; M A J van Rossum; L W A van Suijlekom-Smit; M W Schilham; T W J Huizinga; R E M Toes; R Ten Cate; L A Trouw Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Jing Shi; Lotte A van de Stadt; E W Nivine Levarht; Tom W J Huizinga; Dörte Hamann; Dirkjan van Schaardenburg; René E M Toes; Leendert A Trouw Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Jing Shi; Lotte A van de Stadt; E W Nivine Levarht; Tom W J Huizinga; René E M Toes; Leendert A Trouw; Dirkjan van Schaardenburg Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2013-04
Authors: Xia Jiang; Leendert A Trouw; Tineke J van Wesemael; Jing Shi; Camilla Bengtsson; Henrik Källberg; Vivi Malmström; Lena Israelsson; Hulda Hreggvidsdottir; Willem Verduijn; Lars Klareskog; Lars Alfredsson; Tom W J Huizinga; Rene E M Toes; Karin Lundberg; Diane van der Woude Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Markus M J Nielen; Dirkjan van Schaardenburg; Henk W Reesink; Rob J van de Stadt; Irene E van der Horst-Bruinsma; Margret H M T de Koning; Moud R Habibuw; Jan P Vandenbroucke; Ben A C Dijkmans Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2004-02
Authors: D S Majka; K D Deane; L A Parrish; A A Lazar; A E Barón; C W Walker; M V Rubertone; W R Gilliland; J M Norris; V M Holers Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Lindsay B Kelmenson; Brandie D Wagner; Bryan K McNair; Ashley Frazer-Abel; M Kristen Demoruelle; Dylan T Bergstedt; Marie L Feser; Laura K Moss; Mark C Parish; Elizabeth A Mewshaw; Ted R Mikuls; Jess D Edison; V Michael Holers; Kevin D Deane Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2019-12-26 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Jeffrey A Sparks; Shun-Chiao Chang; Kevin D Deane; Ryan W Gan; M Kristen Demoruelle; Marie L Feser; LauraKay Moss; Jane H Buckner; Richard M Keating; Karen H Costenbader; Peter K Gregersen; Michael H Weisman; Ted R Mikuls; James R O'Dell; V Michael Holers; Jill M Norris; Elizabeth W Karlson Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Jeffrey A Sparks; Maura D Iversen; Zhi Yu; Nellie A Triedman; Maria G Prado; Rachel Miller Kroouze; Sarah S Kalia; Michael L Atkinson; Elinor A Mody; Simon M Helfgott; Derrick J Todd; Paul F Dellaripa; Bonnie L Bermas; Karen H Costenbader; Kevin D Deane; Bing Lu; Robert C Green; Elizabeth W Karlson Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 4.794