Literature DB >> 25593212

Readability Assessment of Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Related to Parathyroid Surgery.

Chirag R Patel1, Saurin Sanghvi1, Deepa V Cherla1, Soly Baredes2, Jean Anderson Eloy3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patient education is critical in obtaining informed consent and reducing preoperative anxiety. Written patient education material (PEM) can supplement verbal communication to improve understanding and satisfaction. Published guidelines recommend that health information be presented at or below a sixth-grade reading level to facilitate comprehension. We investigate the grade level of online PEMs regarding parathyroid surgery.
METHODS: A popular internet search engine was used to identify PEM discussing parathyroid surgery. Four formulas were used to calculate readability scores: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook (GFOG), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG).
RESULTS: Thirty web-based articles discussing parathyroid surgery were identified. The average FRE score was 42.8 (±1 standard deviation [SD] 16.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 36.6-48.8; range, 6.1-71.3). The average FKGL score was 11.7 (±1 SD 3.3; 95% CI, 10.5-12.9; range, 6.1-19.0). The SMOG scores averaged 14.2 (±1 SD 2.6; 95% CI, 13.2-15.2; range, 10.7-21.9), and the GFOG scores averaged 15.0 (±1 SD 3.5; 95% CI, 13.7-16.3; range, 10.6-24.8).
CONCLUSION: Online PEM on parathyroid surgery is written above the recommended sixth-grade reading level. Improving readability of PEM may promote better health education and compliance.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flesch Reading Ease; Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level; health information; parathyroid surgery; patient education material; readability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25593212     DOI: 10.1177/0003489414567938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  6 in total

1.  Initial Readability Assessment of Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria.

Authors:  Tian Kang; Noémie Elhadad; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

2.  Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material for Chronic Medical Conditions.

Authors:  Peter Minh Hoang; Courtney van Ballegooie
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26

3.  Quality and Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Branchial Cleft Cysts.

Authors:  Benjamin S Daines; Winslo Idicula
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-19

4.  Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to nasal septoplasty.

Authors:  Elysia M Grose; Connor P Holmes; Kaishan A Aravinthan; Vincent Wu; John M Lee
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-03-17

5.  Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Readability and Quality Assessment.

Authors:  David Michael Lee; Elysia Grose; Karen Cross
Journal:  JMIR Diabetes       Date:  2022-01-11

6.  Readability of Online Materials Related to Vocal Cord Leukoplakia.

Authors:  Matthew Shneyderman; Grace E Snow; Ruth Davis; Simon Best; Lee M Akst
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2021-08-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.