Literature DB >> 25593118

18F-FDG or 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine to detect transformation of follicular lymphoma.

Marielle J Wondergem1, Saiyada N F Rizvi2, Yvonne Jauw3, Otto S Hoekstra2, Nikie Hoetjes2, Peter M van de Ven4, Ronald Boellaard2, Martine E D Chamuleau3, Saskia A G M Cillessen5, Josien C Regelink6, Sonja Zweegman3, Josée M Zijlstra3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Considering the different treatment strategy for transformed follicular lymphoma (TF) as opposed to follicular lymphoma (FL), diagnosing transformation early in the disease course is important. There is evidence that (18)F-FDG has utility as a biomarker of transformation. However, quantitative thresholds may require inclusion of homogeneous non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes to account for differences in tracer uptake per subtype. Moreover, because proliferation is a hallmark of transformation, 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) might be superior to (18)F-FDG in this setting. To define the best tracer for detection of TF, we performed a prospective a head-to-head comparison of (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FLT in patients with FL and TF.
METHODS: (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FLT PET scans were obtained in 17 patients with FL and 9 patients with TF. We measured the highest maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), defined as the lymph node with the highest uptake per patient, and SUVrange, defined as the difference between the SUVmax of the lymph node with the highest and lowest uptake per patient. To reduce partial-volume effects, only lymph nodes larger than 3 cm(3) (A50 isocontour) were analyzed. Scans were acquired 1 h after injection of 185 MBq of (18)F-FDG or (18)F-FLT. To determine the discriminative ability of SUVmax and SUVrange of both tracers for TF, receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis was performed.
RESULTS: The highest SUVmax was significantly higher for TF than FL for both (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FLT (P < 0.001). SUVrange was significantly higher for TF than FL for (18)F-FDG (P = 0.029) but not for (18)F-FLT (P = 0.075). The ability of (18)F-FDG to discriminate between FL and TF was superior to that of (18)F-FLT for both the highest SUVmax (P = 0.039) and the SUVrange (P = 0.012). The cutoff value for the highest SUVmax of (18)F-FDG aiming at 100% sensitivity with a maximum specificity was found to be 14.5 (corresponding specificity, 82%). For (18)F-FLT, these values were 5.1 and 18%, respectively. When the same method was applied to SUVrange, the cutoff values were 5.8 for (18)F-FDG (specificity, 71%) and 1.5 for (18)F-FLT (specificity, 36%).
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that (18)F-FDG PET is a better biomarker for TF than (18)F-FLT PET. The proposed thresholds of highest SUVmax and SUVrange should be prospectively validated.
© 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG; 18F-FLT; follicular lymphoma; positron emission tomography; transformed lymphoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25593118     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.149625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  7 in total

1.  Role of 18F-FLT PET/CT in suspected recurrent or residual lymphoma: final results of a pilot prospective trial.

Authors:  Lucia Zanoni; Alessandro Broccoli; Alessandro Lambertini; Cinzia Pellegrini; Vittorio Stefoni; Filippo Lodi; Cristina Fonti; Cristina Nanni; Pier Luigi Zinzani; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  [Hemato-oncological imaging : Importance of hybrid procedures].

Authors:  M E Mayerhoefer; A Haug
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Baseline SUVmax did not predict histological transformation in follicular lymphoma in the phase 3 GALLIUM study.

Authors:  Farheen Mir; Sally F Barrington; Helen Brown; Tina Nielsen; Deniz Sahin; Michel Meignan; Judith Trotman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Evaluating Novel PET-CT Functional Parameters TLG and TMTV in Differentiating Low-grade Versus Grade 3A Follicular Lymphoma.

Authors:  Ajay Major; Andrew Hammes; Matthew Q Schmidt; Rustain Morgan; Diana Abbott; Manali Kamdar
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2019-09-28

Review 5.  Systemic Front Line Therapy of Follicular Lymphoma: When, to Whom and How.

Authors:  Francesca Pavanello; Sara Steffanoni; Michele Ghielmini; Emanuele Zucca
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 6.  FDG-PET Scan: a new Paradigm for Follicular Lymphoma Management.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Anna Borra
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 2.576

7.  Transformation Scoring System (TSS): A new assessment index for clinical transformation of follicular lymphoma.

Authors:  Takafumi Shichijo; Dai Maruyama; Nobuhiko Yamauchi; Akiko Miyagi Maeshima; Masato Sugano; Sayako Yuda; Kinuko Tajima; Hiroaki Kurihara; Kaoru Shimada; Tomotaka Suzuki; Kosuke Toyoda; Shinichi Makita; Suguru Fukuhara; Wataru Munakata; Tatsuya Suzuki; Yukio Kobayashi; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Yosuke Minami; Koji Izutsu; Kensei Tobinai
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.452

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.