Literature DB >> 25593056

Role of electrophysiological studies in predicting risk of ventricular arrhythmia in early repolarization syndrome.

Saagar Mahida1, Nicolas Derval2, Frederic Sacher2, Antoine Leenhardt3, Isabel Deisenhofer4, Dominique Babuty5, Jürg Schläpfer6, Luc de Roy7, Robert Frank8, Sinikka Yli-Mayry9, Philippe Mabo10, Thomas Rostock11, Akihiko Nogami12, Jean-Luc Pasquié13, Christian de Chillou14, Josef Kautzner15, Laurence Jesel16, Philippe Maury17, Benjamin Berte2, Seigo Yamashita2, Laurent Roten2, Han S Lim2, Arnaud Denis2, Pierre Bordachar2, Philippe Ritter2, Vincent Probst18, Mélèze Hocini2, Pierre Jaïs2, Michel Haïssaguerre2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The early repolarization (ER) pattern is associated with an increased risk of arrhythmogenic sudden death. However, strategies for risk stratification of patients with the ER pattern are not fully defined.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the role of electrophysiology studies (EPS) in risk stratification of patients with ER syndrome.
METHODS: In a multicenter study, 81 patients with ER syndrome (age 36 ± 13 years, 60 males) and aborted sudden death due to ventricular fibrillation (VF) were included. EPS were performed following the index VF episode using a standard protocol. Inducibility was defined by the provocation of sustained VF. Patients were followed up by serial implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interrogations.
RESULTS: Despite a recent history of aborted sudden death, VF was inducible in only 18 of 81 (22%) patients. During follow-up of 7.0 ± 4.9 years, 6 of 18 (33%) patients with inducible VF during EPS experienced VF recurrences, whereas 21 of 63 (33%) patients who were noninducible experienced recurrent VF (p = 0.93). VF storm occurred in 3 patients from the inducible VF group and in 4 patients in the noninducible group. VF inducibility was not associated with maximum J-wave amplitude (VF inducible vs. VF noninducible; 0.23 ± 0.11 mV vs. 0.21 ± 0.11 mV; p = 0.42) or J-wave distribution (inferior, odds ratio [OR]: 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33 to 2.81]; p = 0.95; lateral, OR: 1.57 [95% CI: 0.35 to 7.04]; p = 0.56; inferior and lateral, OR: 0.83 [95% CI: 0.27 to 2.55]; p = 0.74), which have previously been demonstrated to predict outcome in patients with an ER pattern.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that current programmed stimulation protocols do not enhance risk stratification in ER syndrome.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  early repolarization; sudden cardiac death; ventricular fibrillation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25593056     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  15 in total

1.  Early Repolarisation Syndrome - New Concepts.

Authors:  Demosthenes G Katritsis; Bernard J Gersh; A John Camm
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2015-12-01

Review 2.  J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge.

Authors:  Charles Antzelevitch; Gan-Xin Yan; Michael J Ackerman; Martin Borggrefe; Domenico Corrado; Jihong Guo; Ihor Gussak; Can Hasdemir; Minoru Horie; Heikki Huikuri; Changsheng Ma; Hiroshi Morita; Gi-Byoung Nam; Frederic Sacher; Wataru Shimizu; Sami Viskin; Arthur A M Wilde
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  The Electrophysiological Substrate of Early Repolarization Syndrome: Noninvasive Mapping in Patients.

Authors:  Junjie Zhang; Mélèze Hocini; Maria Strom; Phillip S Cuculich; Daniel H Cooper; Frédéric Sacher; Michel Haïssaguerre; Yoram Rudy
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-08

Review 4.  J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge.

Authors:  Charles Antzelevitch; Gan-Xin Yan; Michael J Ackerman; Martin Borggrefe; Domenico Corrado; Jihong Guo; Ihor Gussak; Can Hasdemir; Minoru Horie; Heikki Huikuri; Changsheng Ma; Hiroshi Morita; Gi-Byoung Nam; Frederic Sacher; Wataru Shimizu; Sami Viskin; Arthur A M Wilde
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 5.  Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification - An Update.

Authors:  Reginald Liew
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2015-12

Review 6.  Why Is There an Increased Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With Early Repolarization Syndrome?

Authors:  Shreyas Yakkali; Sneha Teresa Selvin; Sonu Thomas; Viktoriya Bikeyeva; Ahmed Abdullah; Aleksandra Radivojevic; Anas A Abu Jad; Anvesh Ravanavena; Chetna Ravindra; Emmanuelar O Igweonu-Nwakile; Safina Ali; Salomi Paul; Pousette Hamid
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-13

7.  Brugada Syndrome and Early Repolarisation: Distinct Clinical Entities or Different Phenotypes of the Same Genetic Disease?

Authors:  Giulio Conte; Maria Luce Caputo; François Regoli; Tiziano Moccetti; Pedro Brugada; Angelo Auricchio
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-08

8.  Early Repolarisation - What Should the Clinician Do?

Authors:  Manoj N Obeyesekere; Andrew D Krahn
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2015-08

9.  An update on early repolarization(ER) syndrome.

Authors:  Soumya R Mahapatra; Praloy Chakraborty
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2016-03-03

10.  Role of Early Repolarization Pattern in Increasing Risk of Death.

Authors:  Yun-Jiu Cheng; Xiao-Xiong Lin; Cheng-Cheng Ji; Xu-Miao Chen; Li-Juan Liu; Kai Tang; Su-Hua Wu
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.