Hanna Tolonen1, Sanna Ahonen2, Susie Jentoft3, Kari Kuulasmaa4, Johan Heldal3. 1. Department of Chronic Disease Prevention, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland hanna.tolonen@thl.fi. 2. Department of Health, Functional Capacity and Welfare, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland. 3. Statistics Norway, Norway. 4. Department of Chronic Disease Prevention, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland.
Abstract
AIMS: In the 1980s, participation rates in health interview and health examination surveys were around 80% while now they are around 50-60%. There is also evidence that non-participation is selective. Low participation rates and selective non-participation may cause bias to our survey results based on participants alone. We aim to increase knowledge on cultural differences in acceptance and feasibility of different recruitment methods. METHODS: The European Health Examination Survey Pilot Project, conducted in 2009-2012, included pilot surveys in 12 countries among people aged 25-64 years. Information about recruitment methods and participation rates in these surveys was collected. RESULTS: Participation rates ranged from 16% to 57% for men and from 31% to 74% for women, where in most surveys women had higher participation rates than men. A variety of recruitment and promotion methods were used to obtain as high participation rates as possible. Combinations of phone calls, invitation letter and home visits were used to recruit invitees. Obtaining valid phone numbers for survey invitees was difficult in several countries. Incentives, websites and promotion in local media were used to promote the surveys. CONCLUSIONS: The European Health Examination Survey Pilot surveys showed that obtaining a participation rate above 50% for a representative population sample is possible but it requires hard work and a well-planned recruitment strategy. Recruitment methods used in one country may not be possible to use in another country due to cultural norms and national regulations.
AIMS: In the 1980s, participation rates in health interview and health examination surveys were around 80% while now they are around 50-60%. There is also evidence that non-participation is selective. Low participation rates and selective non-participation may cause bias to our survey results based on participants alone. We aim to increase knowledge on cultural differences in acceptance and feasibility of different recruitment methods. METHODS: The European Health Examination Survey Pilot Project, conducted in 2009-2012, included pilot surveys in 12 countries among people aged 25-64 years. Information about recruitment methods and participation rates in these surveys was collected. RESULTS: Participation rates ranged from 16% to 57% for men and from 31% to 74% for women, where in most surveys women had higher participation rates than men. A variety of recruitment and promotion methods were used to obtain as high participation rates as possible. Combinations of phone calls, invitation letter and home visits were used to recruit invitees. Obtaining valid phone numbers for survey invitees was difficult in several countries. Incentives, websites and promotion in local media were used to promote the surveys. CONCLUSIONS: The European Health Examination Survey Pilot surveys showed that obtaining a participation rate above 50% for a representative population sample is possible but it requires hard work and a well-planned recruitment strategy. Recruitment methods used in one country may not be possible to use in another country due to cultural norms and national regulations.
Authors: Luís Alves; Ana Azevedo; Henrique Barros; Peter Vollenweider; Gérard Waeber; Pedro Marques-Vidal Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Magdalena Kwaśniewska; Małgorzata Pikala; Wojciech Bielecki; Elżbieta Dziankowska-Zaborszczyk; Ewa Rębowska; Krystyna Kozakiewicz; Andrzej Pająk; Jerzy Piwoński; Andrzej Tykarski; Tomasz Zdrojewski; Wojciech Drygas Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Satu Jokela; Eero Lilja; Tarja I Kinnunen; Mika Gissler; Anu E Castaneda; Päivikki Koponen Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2018-07-10 Impact factor: 3.007