Literature DB >> 25592152

A central role for heme iron in colon carcinogenesis associated with red meat intake.

Nadia M Bastide1, Fatima Chenni2, Marc Audebert3, Raphaelle L Santarelli3, Sylviane Taché3, Nathalie Naud3, Maryse Baradat3, Isabelle Jouanin3, Reggie Surya3, Ditte A Hobbs4, Gunter G Kuhnle4, Isabelle Raymond-Letron5, Françoise Gueraud3, Denis E Corpet3, Fabrice H F Pierre6.   

Abstract

Epidemiology shows that red and processed meat intake is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Heme iron, heterocyclic amines, and endogenous N-nitroso compounds (NOC) are proposed to explain this effect, but their relative contribution is unknown. Our study aimed at determining, at nutritional doses, which is the main factor involved and proposing a mechanism of cancer promotion by red meat. The relative part of heme iron (1% in diet), heterocyclic amines (PhIP + MeIQx, 50 + 25 μg/kg in diet), and NOC (induced by NaNO₂+ NaNO₂; 0.17 + 0.23 g/L of drinking water) was determined by a factorial design and preneoplastic endpoints in chemically induced rats and validated on tumors in Min mice. The molecular mechanisms (genotoxicity, cytotoxicity) were analyzed in vitro in normal and Apc-deficient cell lines and confirmed on colon mucosa. Heme iron increased the number of preneoplastic lesions, but dietary heterocyclic amines and NOC had no effect on carcinogenesis in rats. Dietary hemoglobin increased tumor load in Min mice (control diet: 67 ± 39 mm²; 2.5% hemoglobin diet: 114 ± 47 mm², P = 0.004). In vitro, fecal water from rats given hemoglobin was rich in aldehydes and was cytotoxic to normal cells, but not to premalignant cells. The aldehydes 4-hydroxynonenal and 4-hydroxyhexenal were more toxic to normal versus mutated cells and were only genotoxic to normal cells. Genotoxicity was also observed in colon mucosa of mice given hemoglobin. These results highlight the role of heme iron in the promotion of colon cancer by red meat and suggest that heme iron could initiate carcinogenesis through lipid peroxidation. . ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25592152     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  56 in total

Review 1.  Nutrient-Gene Interaction in Colon Cancer, from the Membrane to Cellular Physiology.

Authors:  Tim Y Hou; Laurie A Davidson; Eunjoo Kim; Yang-Yi Fan; Natividad R Fuentes; Karen Triff; Robert S Chapkin
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 11.848

2.  Antiatherogenic and antitumoral properties of Opuntia cladodes: inhibition of low density lipoprotein oxidation by vascular cells, and protection against the cytotoxicity of lipid oxidation product 4-hydroxynonenal in a colorectal cancer cellular model.

Authors:  Julia Keller; Caroline Camaré; Corinne Bernis; Marizel Astello-García; Ana-Paulina Barba de la Rosa; Michel Rossignol; María del Socorro Santos Díaz; Robert Salvayre; Anne Negre-Salvayre; Françoise Guéraud
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.158

Review 3.  Iron and Cancer.

Authors:  Suzy V Torti; David H Manz; Bibbin T Paul; Nicole Blanchette-Farra; Frank M Torti
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 4.  Molecular mechanisms of the preventable causes of cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Erica A Golemis; Paul Scheet; Tim N Beck; Eward M Scolnick; David J Hunter; Ernest Hawk; Nancy Hopkins
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  A Prospective Analysis of Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Women.

Authors:  Suril S Mehta; Whitney D Arroyave; Ruth M Lunn; Yong-Moon Mark Park; Windy A Boyd; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Meat intake, cooking methods and doneness and risk of colorectal tumours in the Spanish multicase-control study (MCC-Spain).

Authors:  Jordi de Batlle; Esther Gracia-Lavedan; Dora Romaguera; Michelle Mendez; Gemma Castaño-Vinyals; Vicente Martín; Núria Aragonés; Inés Gómez-Acebo; Rocío Olmedo-Requena; José Juan Jimenez-Moleon; Marcela Guevara; Mikel Azpiri; Cristóbal Llorens-Ivorra; Guillermo Fernandez-Tardon; Jose Andrés Lorca; José María Huerta; Victor Moreno; Elena Boldo; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Jesús Castilla; Tania Fernández-Villa; Juan Pablo Barrio; Montserrat Andreu; Antoni Castells; Trinidad Dierssen; Jone M Altzibar; Manolis Kogevinas; Marina Pollán; Pilar Amiano
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 7.  Colorectal cancer: role of commensal bacteria and bystander effects.

Authors:  Xingmin Wang; Mark M Huycke
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2015

8.  Recommendation-based dietary indexes and risk of colorectal cancer in the Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Joshua Petimar; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Teresa T Fung; Bernard Rosner; Andrew T Chan; Frank B Hu; Edward L Giovannucci; Fred K Tabung
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Preoperative iron status is a prognosis factor for stage II and III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Sawayama; Yuji Miyamoto; Kosuke Mima; Rikako Kato; Katsuhiro Ogawa; Yukiharu Hiyoshi; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Takahiko Akiyama; Yuki Kiyozumi; Shiro Iwagami; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Yoshifumi Baba; Naoya Yoshida; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Iron Uptake via DMT1 Integrates Cell Cycle with JAK-STAT3 Signaling to Promote Colorectal Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Xiang Xue; Sadeesh K Ramakrishnan; Kevin Weisz; Daniel Triner; Liwei Xie; Durga Attili; Asha Pant; Balázs Győrffy; Mingkun Zhan; Christin Carter-Su; Karin M Hardiman; Thomas D Wang; Michael K Dame; James Varani; Dean Brenner; Eric R Fearon; Yatrik M Shah
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 27.287

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.