Literature DB >> 25591937

Anterior-oriented proton beams for prostate cancer: A multi-institutional experience.

John J Cuaron1, Alexander A Harris, Brian Chon, Henry Tsai, Gary Larson, William F Hartsell, Eugen Hug, Oren Cahlon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proton beam therapy (PBT) for prostate cancer generally involves the use of two lateral beams that transverse the hips. In patients with hip replacements or a previously irradiated hip, this arrangement is contraindicated. The use of non-lateral beams is possible, but not well described. Here we report a multi-institutional experience for patients treated with at least one non-lateral proton beam for prostate cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, 20 patients with organ-confined prostate cancer and a history of hip prosthesis underwent proton therapy utilizing at least one anterior oblique beam (defined as between 10° and 85° from vertical) at one of three proton centers.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 6.4 months. No patients have developed PSA failure or distant metastases. The median planning target volume (PTV) D95 was 79.2 Gy (RBE) (range 69.7-79.9). The median rectal V70 was 9.2% (2.5-15.4). The median bladder V50, V80, and mean dose were 12.4% (3.7-27.1), 3.5 cm3 (0-7.1), and 14.9 Gy (RBE) (4.6-37.8), respectively. The median contralateral femur head V45 and max dose were 0.01 cm3 (0-16.6) and 43.7 Gy (RBE) (15.6-52.5), respectively. The incidence of acute Grade 2 urinary toxicity was 40%. There were no Grade≥3 urinary toxicities. There was one patient who developed late Grade 2 rectal proctitis, with no other cases of acute or late ≥Grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity. Grade 2 erectile dysfunction occurred in two patients (11.1%). Mild hip pain was experienced by five patients (25%). There were no cases of hip fracture.
CONCLUSION: PBT for prostate cancer utilizing anterior oblique beam trajectories is feasible with favorable dosimetry and acceptable toxicity. Further follow-up is needed to assess for long-term outcomes and toxicities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25591937     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.986288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  11 in total

Review 1.  Proton versus photon-based radiation therapy for prostate cancer: emerging evidence and considerations in the era of value-based cancer care.

Authors:  Sophia C Kamran; Jay O Light; Jason A Efstathiou
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  Anteriorly Oriented Beam Arrangements with Daily in Vivo Range Verification for Proton Therapy of Prostate Cancer: Rectal Toxicity Rates.

Authors:  Jerimy C Polf; Michael Chuong; Bin Zhang; Minesh Mehta
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2016-03-24

Review 3.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria® external beam radiation therapy treatment planning for clinically localized prostate cancer, part I of II.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Timothy N Showalter; Gary A Ezzell; Paul L Nguyen; Dean G Assimos; Anthony V D'Amico; Alexander R Gottschalk; Gary S Gustafson; Sameer R Keole; Stanley L Liauw; Shane Lloyd; Patrick W McLaughlin; Benjamin Movsas; Bradley R Prestidge; Al V Taira; Neha Vapiwala; Brian J Davis
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-10-20

4.  Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of intensity modulated proton therapy and RapidArc planning for high-risk prostate cancer with seminal vesicles.

Authors:  Suresh Rana; ChihYao Cheng; Li Zhao; SungYong Park; Gary Larson; Carlos Vargas; Megan Dunn; Yuanshui Zheng
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2016-05-11

5.  Rectal dose to prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy with or without rectal spacer.

Authors:  Heeteak Chung; Jerimy Polf; Shahed Badiyan; Matthew Biagioli; Daniel Fernandez; Kujtim Latifi; Richard Wilder; Minesh Mehta; Michael Chuong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  On-line dose-guidance to account for inter-fractional motion during proton therapy.

Authors:  Kia Busch; Ludvig P Muren; Sara Thörnqvist; Andreas G Andersen; Jesper Pedersen; Lei Dong; Jørgen B B Petersen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-12-19

7.  A biological modelling based comparison of radiotherapy plan robustness using photons vs protons for focal prostate boosting.

Authors:  Jesper Pedersen; Oscar Casares-Magaz; Jørgen B B Petersen; Jarle Rørvik; Lise Bentzen; Andreas G Andersen; Ludvig P Muren
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-07-18

Review 8.  Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Darren M C Poon; Stephen Wu; Leon Ho; Kin Yin Cheung; Ben Yu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  A planning study of focal dose escalations to multiparametric MRI-defined dominant intraprostatic lesions in prostate proton radiation therapy.

Authors:  Tonghe Wang; Jun Zhou; Sibo Tian; Yinan Wang; Pretesh Patel; Ashesh B Jani; Katja M Langen; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria for external beam radiation therapy treatment planning for clinically localized prostate cancer, part II of II.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Timothy N Showalter; Gary A Ezzell; Paul L Nguyen; Dean G Assimos; Anthony V D'Amico; Alexander R Gottschalk; Gary S Gustafson; Sameer R Keole; Stanley L Liauw; Shane Lloyd; Patrick W McLaughlin; Benjamin Movsas; Bradley R Prestidge; Al V Taira; Neha Vapiwala; Brian J Davis
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.