Literature DB >> 25590261

Electron beam inactivation of Tulane virus on fresh produce, and mechanism of inactivation of human norovirus surrogates by electron beam irradiation.

Ashley Predmore1, Gabriel C Sanglay2, Erin DiCaprio3, Jianrong Li3, R M Uribe4, Ken Lee2.   

Abstract

Ionizing radiation, whether by electron beams or gamma rays, is a non-thermal processing technique used to improve the microbial safety and shelf-life of many different food products. This technology is highly effective against bacterial pathogens, but data on its effect against foodborne viruses is limited. A mechanism of viral inactivation has been proposed with gamma irradiation, but no published study discloses a mechanism for electron beam (e-beam). This study had three distinct goals: 1) evaluate the sensitivity of a human norovirus surrogate, Tulane virus (TV), to e-beam irradiation in foods, 2) compare the difference in sensitivity of TV and murine norovirus (MNV-1) to e-beam irradiation, and 3) determine the mechanism of inactivation of these two viruses by e-beam irradiation. TV was reduced from 7 log10 units to undetectable levels at target doses of 16 kGy or higher in two food matrices (strawberries and lettuce). MNV-1 was more resistant to e-beam treatment than TV. At target doses of 4 kGy, e-beam provided a 1.6 and 1.2 log reduction of MNV-1 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), compared to a 1.5 and 1.8 log reduction of TV in PBS and Opti-MEM, respectively. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that increased e-beam doses negatively affected the structure of both viruses. Analysis of viral proteins by SDS-PAGE found that irradiation also degraded viral proteins. Using RT-PCR, irradiation was shown to degrade viral genomic RNA. This suggests that the mechanism of inactivation of e-beam was likely the same as gamma irradiation as the damage to viral constituents led to inactivation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  E-beam; Electron beam; Irradiation; Norovirus; Produce; Virus

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25590261     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  5 in total

1.  Inactivation of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus with electron beam irradiation under cold chain conditions.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Yang Shao; Lu Wang; Weilai Lu; Shihua Li; Diandou Xu; Yu Vincent Fu
Journal:  Environ Technol Innov       Date:  2022-06-06

2.  Effect of Leaf Surface Chemical Properties on Efficacy of Sanitizer for Rotavirus Inactivation.

Authors:  Miyu Fuzawa; Kang-Mo Ku; Sindy Paola Palma-Salgado; Kenya Nagasaka; Hao Feng; John A Juvik; Daisuke Sano; Joanna L Shisler; Thanh H Nguyen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Thermal Inactivation of Enteric Viruses and Bioaccumulation of Enteric Foodborne Viruses in Live Oysters (Crassostrea virginica).

Authors:  Elbashir Araud; Erin DiCaprio; Yuanmei Ma; Fangfei Lou; Yu Gao; David Kingsley; John H Hughes; Jianrong Li
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Inactivation of two SARS-CoV-2 virus surrogates by electron beam irradiation on large yellow croaker slices and their packaging surfaces.

Authors:  Zonghong Luo; Ke Ni; Yuancheng Zhou; Guanhong Chang; Jiangtao Yu; Chunling Zhang; Wenqi Yin; Dishi Chen; Shuwei Li; Shengyao Kuang; Peng Zhang; Kui Li; Junqing Bai; Xin Wang
Journal:  Food Control       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 6.652

Review 5.  Foodborne viruses: Detection, risk assessment, and control options in food processing.

Authors:  Albert Bosch; Elissavet Gkogka; Françoise S Le Guyader; Fabienne Loisy-Hamon; Alvin Lee; Lilou van Lieshout; Balkumar Marthi; Mette Myrmel; Annette Sansom; Anna Charlotte Schultz; Anett Winkler; Sophie Zuber; Trevor Phister
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.277

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.