Literature DB >> 25589765

Dynamics of EEG rhythms support distinct visual selection mechanisms in parietal cortex: a simultaneous transcranial magnetic stimulation and EEG study.

Paolo Capotosto1, Sara Spadone2, Annalisa Tosoni2, Carlo Sestieri2, Gian Luca Romani2, Stefania Della Penna2, Maurizio Corbetta3.   

Abstract

Using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), we have recently shown a functional anatomical distinction in human parietal cortex between regions involved in maintaining attention to a location [ventral intraparietal sulcus (vIPS)] and a region involved in shifting attention between locations [medial superior parietal lobule (mSPL)]. In particular, while rTMS interference over vIPS impaired target discrimination at contralateral attended locations, interference over mSPL affected performance following shifts of attention regardless of the visual field (Capotosto et al., 2013). Here, using rTMS interference in conjunction with EEG recordings of brain rhythms during the presentation of cues that indicate to either shift or maintain spatial attention, we tested whether this functional anatomical segregation involves different mechanisms of rhythm synchronization. The transient inactivation of vIPS reduced the amplitude of the expected parieto-occipital low-α (8-10 Hz) desynchronization contralateral to the cued location. Conversely, the transient inactivation of mSPL, compared with vIPS, reduced the high-α (10-12 Hz) desynchronization induced by shifting attention into both visual fields. Furthermore, rTMS induced a frequency-specific delay of task-related modulation of brain rhythms. Specifically, rTMS over vIPS or mSPL during maintenance (stay cues) or shifting (shift cues) of spatial attention, respectively, caused a delay of α parieto-occipital desynchronization. Moreover, rTMS over vIPS during stay cues caused a delay of δ (2-4 Hz) frontocentral synchronization. These findings further support the anatomo-functional subdivision of the dorsal attention network in subsystems devoted to shifting or maintaining covert visuospatial attention and indicate that these mechanisms operate in different frequency channels linking frontal to parieto-occipital visual regions.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/350721-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG rhythms; TMS; attention; parietal cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25589765      PMCID: PMC4293418          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2066-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  61 in total

Review 1.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Neuronal synchronization along the dorsal visual pathway reflects the focus of spatial attention.

Authors:  Markus Siegel; Tobias H Donner; Robert Oostenveld; Pascal Fries; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  The strength of anticipatory spatial biasing predicts target discrimination at attended locations: a high-density EEG study.

Authors:  Simon P Kelly; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Tuning of the human neocortex to the temporal dynamics of attended events.

Authors:  Julien Besle; Catherine A Schevon; Ashesh D Mehta; Peter Lakatos; Robert R Goodman; Guy M McKhann; Ronald G Emerson; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 6.  The functional states of the thalamus and the associated neuronal interplay.

Authors:  M Steriade; R R Llinás
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Oscillatory sensory selection mechanisms during intersensory attention to rhythmic auditory and visual inputs: a human electrocorticographic investigation.

Authors:  Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Simon P Kelly; Sophie Molholm; Pejman Sehatpour; Theodore H Schwartz; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Anatomical segregation of visual selection mechanisms in human parietal cortex.

Authors:  Paolo Capotosto; Annalisa Tosoni; Sara Spadone; Carlo Sestieri; Mauro Gianni Perrucci; Gian Luca Romani; Stefania Della Penna; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Distinct representations for shifts of spatial attention and changes of reward contingencies in the human brain.

Authors:  Annalisa Tosoni; Gordon L Shulman; Anna L W Pope; Mark P McAvoy; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Cross-frequency coupling in real and virtual brain networks.

Authors:  Viktor Jirsa; Viktor Müller
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.380

View more
  8 in total

1.  Dynamic reorganization of human resting-state networks during visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Sara Spadone; Stefania Della Penna; Carlo Sestieri; Viviana Betti; Annalisa Tosoni; Mauro Gianni Perrucci; Gian Luca Romani; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Functional Specialization in the Attention Network.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  1-Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over the Posterior Parietal Cortex Modulates Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Guang-Qing Xu; Yue Lan; Qun Zhang; Dong-Xu Liu; Xiao-Fei He; Tuo Lin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Offline stimulation of human parietal cortex differently affects resting EEG microstates.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Croce; Filippo Zappasodi; Paolo Capotosto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Temporal dynamics of TMS interference over preparatory alpha activity during semantic decisions.

Authors:  Sara Spadone; Carlo Sestieri; Antonello Baldassarre; Paolo Capotosto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Theta-burst stimulation causally affects side perception in the Deutsch's octave illusion.

Authors:  Paolo Capotosto; Stefania Della Penna; Vittorio Pizzella; Filippo Zappasodi; Gian Luca Romani; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Alfredo Brancucci
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The whole is faster than its parts: evidence for temporally independent attention to distinct spatial locations.

Authors:  Andrew Clement; Nestor Matthews
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Pre-stimulus EEG Microstates Correlate With Anticipatory Alpha Desynchronization.

Authors:  Sara Spadone; Pierpaolo Croce; Filippo Zappasodi; Paolo Capotosto
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.