Literature DB >> 25589295

Reward modulates perception in binocular rivalry.

Svenja Marx1, Wolfgang Einhäuser1.   

Abstract

Our perception does not provide us with an exact imprint of the outside world, but is continuously adapted to our internal expectations, task sets, and behavioral goals. Although effects of reward-or value in general-on perception therefore seem likely, how valuation modulates perception and how such modulation relates to attention is largely unknown. We probed effects of reward on perception by using a binocular-rivalry paradigm. Distinct gratings drifting in opposite directions were presented to each observer's eyes. To objectify their subjective perceptual experience, the optokinetic nystagmus was used as measure of current perceptual dominance. In a first experiment, one of the percepts was either rewarded or attended. We found that reward and attention similarly biased perception. In a second experiment, observers performed an attentionally demanding task either on the rewarded stimulus, the other stimulus, or both. We found that-on top of an attentional effect on perception-at each level of attentional load, reward still modulated perception by increasing the dominance of the rewarded percept. Similarly, penalizing one percept increased dominance of the other at each level of attentional load. In turn, rewarding-and similarly nonpunishing-a percept yielded performance benefits that are typically associated with selective attention. In conclusion, our data show that value modulates perception in a similar way as the volitional deployment of attention, even though the relative effect of value is largely unaffected by an attention task.
© 2015 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; binocular rivalry; decision making; perception; reward

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25589295     DOI: 10.1167/15.1.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  4 in total

1.  No Apparent Influence of Reward upon Visual Statistical Learning.

Authors:  Leeland L Rogers; Kyle G Friedman; Timothy J Vickery
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-02

2.  Revisiting the empirical case against perceptual modularity.

Authors:  Farid Masrour; Gregory Nirshberg; Michael Schon; Jason Leardi; Emily Barrett
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-04

3.  fMRI-based decoding of reward effects in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Gregor Wilbertz; Bianca M van Kemenade; Katharina Schmack; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2017-06-30

4.  Idiosyncratic preferences in transparent motion and binocular rivalry are dissociable.

Authors:  Byung-Woo Hwang; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.