Literature DB >> 25589227

Updates on quick identification of acetic acid bacteria with a focus on the 16S-23S rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer and the analysis of cell proteins by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.

Janja Trček1, François Barja2.   

Abstract

Acetic acid bacteria have attracted much attention over the past few years, due mainly to their metabolic traits that are of interest to the biotechnology industry. In addition, it turns out that their ecological habitats are almost unlimited since they have been found as symbionts in different insects and also as emerging opportunistic human pathogens. Very surprising is the finding that they colonize niches considered anaerobic, disproving the generalized statement that they are strict aerobes. Since they have taken on different biological roles in our environment, more and more people are charged with the task of identifying them. However, this turns out to be not always easy, especially if we are using phenotypic approaches for identification. A substantial step forward in making the identification of acetic acid bacteria easier was made possible using molecular biological methods, which have been extensively tested since 2000. However, some molecular methods require expensive machines and experienced staff, and moreover the level of their discrimination varies. All these factors must be considered when selecting the most appropriate approach for identifying acetic acid bacteria. With this objective in mind, this review article discusses the benefits and drawbacks of molecular biological methods for identification of acetic acid bacteria, with a focus on the 16S-23S rRNA gene ITS regions and the recently described alternative method for identification of acetic acid bacteria, MALDI-TOF MS.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S–23S rRNA gene ITS; Acetic acid bacteria; Acetobacter; Gluconobacter; MALDI-TOF MS; Quick identification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25589227     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  12 in total

Review 1.  Impacts of type II toxin-antitoxin systems on cell physiology and environmental behavior in acetic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Kai Xia; Jiawen Ma; Xinle Liang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Comparison of Cultivable Acetic Acid Bacterial Microbiota in Organic and Conventional Apple Cider Vinegar.

Authors:  Aleksandra Štornik; Barbara Skok; Janja Trček
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.918

3.  16S rRNA in situ Hybridization Followed by Flow Cytometry for Rapid Identification of Acetic Acid Bacteria Involved in Submerged Industrial Vinegar Production.

Authors:  Janja Trček; Luka Lipoglavšek; Gorazd Avguštin
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.918

4.  Vinegar Production from Jabuticaba (Myrciaria jaboticaba) Fruit Using Immobilized Acetic Acid Bacteria.

Authors:  Disney Ribeiro Dias; Monique Suela Silva; Angélica Cristina de Souza; Karina Teixeira Magalhăes-Guedes; Fernanda Severo de Rezende Ribeiro; Rosane Freitas Schwan
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.918

Review 5.  Acetic Acid Bacteria in the Food Industry: Systematics, Characteristics and Applications.

Authors:  Rodrigo José Gomes; Maria de Fatima Borges; Morsyleide de Freitas Rosa; Raúl Jorge Hernan Castro-Gómez; Wilma Aparecida Spinosa
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.918

Review 6.  Biotechnological Processes in Fruit Vinegar Production.

Authors:  Luz María Luzón-Quintana; Remedios Castro; Enrique Durán-Guerrero
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-04-26

Review 7.  Classification of acetic acid bacteria and their acid resistant mechanism.

Authors:  Xiaoman Qiu; Yao Zhang; Housheng Hong
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.298

8.  Antimicrobial Resistance of Acetobacter and Komagataeibacter Species Originating from Vinegars.

Authors:  Eva Cepec; Janja Trček
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  A novel strain of acetic acid bacteria Gluconobacter oxydans FBFS97 involved in riboflavin production.

Authors:  Abeer Essam Noman; Naif S Al-Barha; Abdul-Aziz M Sharaf; Qais Ali Al-Maqtari; Amani Mohedein; Hammad Hamed Hammad Mohammed; Fusheng Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Bacterial Cellulose: Production, Modification and Perspectives in Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Selestina Gorgieva; Janja Trček
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 5.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.