Literature DB >> 25588856

MGMT promoter methylation and glioblastoma: a comparison of analytical methods and of tumor specimens.

Laura Lattanzio1, Marzia Borgognone, Cristina Mocellini, Fabrizio Giordano, Ermanno Favata, Gaetano Fasano, Daniela Vivenza, Martino Monteverde, Federica Tonissi, Annalisa Ghiglia, Claudia Fillini, Claudio Bernucci, Marco Merlano, Cristiana Lo Nigro.   

Abstract

It is already well known that hypermethylation of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter is a predictive biomarker of response to temozolomide treatment and of favorable outcomes in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Nevertheless, MGMT methylation status has not currently been introduced into routine clinical practice, as the choice of the ideal technique and tissue sample specimen is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare 2 analytical methods, methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PSQ), and their use on 2 different tissue type samples, snap-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE), obtained from a single-center and uniformly treated cohort of 46 GBM patients. We obtained methylation data from all frozen tissues, while no results were obtained for 5 FFPE samples. The highest concordance for methylation was found on frozen tissues (88.5%, 23/26 samples), using PSQ (76.7%, 23/30 samples). Moreover, we confirmed that OS and PFS for patients carrying methylation of the MGMT promoter were longer than for patients with an unmethylated promoter. In conclusion, we considered MSP a limited technique for FFPE tissues due to the high risk of false-positive results; in contrast, our data indicated PSQ as the most powerful method to stratify methylated/unmethylated patients as it allows reaching quantitative results with high sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, frozen tumor tissues were shown to be the best specimens for MGMT methylation analysis, due to the low DNA degradation and homogeneity in methylation throughout the tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25588856     DOI: 10.5301/jbm.5000126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Markers        ISSN: 0393-6155            Impact factor:   2.659


  13 in total

Review 1.  MGMT testing allows for personalised therapy in the temozolomide era.

Authors:  A Dullea; L Marignol
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-10-30

2.  Pyrosequencing Analysis of MGMT Promoter Methylation in Meningioma.

Authors:  Ioannis Panagopoulos; Ludmila Gorunova; Henning Leske; Pitt Niehusmann; Lene E Johannessen; Julie Staurseth; Nina Øino; Torstein R Meling; Sverre Heim; Francesca Micci; Petter Brandal
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.069

3.  Molecular Biomarker Testing for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Gliomas.

Authors:  Daniel J Brat; Kenneth Aldape; Julia A Bridge; Peter Canoll; Howard Colman; Meera R Hameed; Brent T Harris; Eyas M Hattab; Jason T Huse; Robert B Jenkins; Dolores H Lopez-Terrada; William C McDonald; Fausto J Rodriguez; Lesley H Souter; Carol Colasacco; Nicole E Thomas; Michelle Hawks Yount; Martin J van den Bent; Arie Perry
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 5.686

4.  Defining the cutoff value of MGMT gene promoter methylation and its predictive capacity in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Giovanni Brigliadori; Flavia Foca; Monia Dall'Agata; Claudia Rengucci; Elisabetta Melegari; Serenella Cerasoli; Dino Amadori; Daniele Calistri; Marina Faedi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Prognostic value of test(s) for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for predicting overall survival in people with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide.

Authors:  Alexandra McAleenan; Claire Kelly; Francesca Spiga; Ashleigh Kernohan; Hung-Yuan Cheng; Sarah Dawson; Lena Schmidt; Tomos Robinson; Sebastian Brandner; Claire L Faulkner; Christopher Wragg; Sarah Jefferies; Amy Howell; Luke Vale; Julian P T Higgins; Kathreena M Kurian
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-12

Review 6.  Regulation of expression of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and the treatment of glioblastoma (Review).

Authors:  Giulio Cabrini; Enrica Fabbri; Cristiana Lo Nigro; Maria Cristina Dechecchi; Roberto Gambari
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 7.  Clinical Neuropathology practice guide 5-2015: MGMT methylation pyrosequencing in glioblastoma: unresolved issues and open questions.

Authors:  Michal Bienkowski; Anna S Berghoff; Christine Marosi; Adelheid Wöhrer; Harald Heinzl; Johannes A Hainfellner; Matthias Preusser
Journal:  Clin Neuropathol       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.368

8.  Pyrosequencing versus methylation-specific PCR for assessment of MGMT methylation in tumor and blood samples of glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Anna Estival; Carolina Sanz; Jose-Luis Ramirez; Jose Maria Velarde; Marta Domenech; Cristina Carrato; Ramón de Las Peñas; Miguel Gil-Gil; Juan Sepúlveda; Roser Armengol; Isaac Cardiel; Alfonso Berrocal; Raquel Luque; Ana Herrero; Carmen Balana
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Validation of the high-performance of pyrosequencing for clinical MGMT testing on a cohort of glioblastoma patients from a prospective dedicated multicentric trial.

Authors:  Véronique Quillien; Audrey Lavenu; François Ducray; Marie-Odile Joly; Olivier Chinot; Frédéric Fina; Marc Sanson; Catherine Carpentier; Lucie Karayan-Tapon; Pierre Rivet; Natacha Entz-Werle; Michèle Legrain; Emmanuèle Lechapt Zalcman; Guenaelle Levallet; Fabienne Escande; Carole Ramirez; Dan Chiforeanu; Elodie Vauleon; Dominique Figarella-Branger
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-20

10.  Patterns of diagnostic marker assessment in adult diffuse glioma: a survey of the European Confederation of Neuropathological Societies (Euro-CNS).

Authors:  Adelheid Woehrer; Bjarne W Kristensen; Anne Vital; Johannes A Hainfellner
Journal:  Clin Neuropathol       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.368

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.