Literature DB >> 25588818

Open your eyes for prediction errors.

Senne Braem1, Ena Coenen, Klaas Bombeke, Marlies E van Bochove, Wim Notebaert.   

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that autonomic arousal is increased following correct task performance on a difficult, relative to an easy, task. Here, we hypothesized that this arousal response reflects the (relative) surprise of correct performance following a difficult versus an easy task. Following this line of reasoning, we would expect to find a reversed pattern following erroneous responses, because errors are less expected during an easy than during a difficult task. To test this, participants performed a flanker task while pupil size was measured online. As predicted, the results demonstrated that pupil size was larger following difficult (incongruent) correct trials than following easy (congruent) correct trials, but smaller following difficult than following easy incorrect trials. Moreover, participants with larger congruency effects, and hence a larger difference in outcome expectancies between the two trial types, showed larger differences in pupil size after both correct and incorrect responses, further corroborating the idea that pupil size increased as a measure of performance prediction errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25588818     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-014-0333-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  43 in total

Review 1.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance.

Authors:  Gary Aston-Jones; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS windows platform.

Authors:  Michael Stevens; Jan Lammertyn; Frederick Verbruggen; André Vandierendonck
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2006-05

3.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving.

Authors:  E H Hess; J M Polt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-03-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The processing of unexpected positive response outcomes in the mediofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Nicola K Ferdinand; Axel Mecklinger; Jutta Kray; William J Gehring
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  No pain, no gain: the affective valence of congruency conditions changes following a successful response.

Authors:  Nathalie Schouppe; Senne Braem; Jan De Houwer; Massimo Silvetti; Tom Verguts; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Reward expectation and prediction error in human medial frontal cortex: an EEG study.

Authors:  Massimo Silvetti; Elena Nuñez Castellar; Clémence Roger; Tom Verguts
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Preference for rewards that follow greater effort and greater delay.

Authors:  Jérôme Alessandri; Jean-Claude Darcheville; Yvonne Delevoye-Turrell; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Pupil Dilation Signals Surprise: Evidence for Noradrenaline's Role in Decision Making.

Authors:  Kerstin Preuschoff; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Rational regulation of learning dynamics by pupil-linked arousal systems.

Authors:  Matthew R Nassar; Katherine M Rumsey; Robert C Wilson; Kinjan Parikh; Benjamin Heasly; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Effects of arousal on cognitive control: empirical tests of the conflict-modulated Hebbian-learning hypothesis.

Authors:  Stephen B R E Brown; Henk van Steenbergen; Tomer Kedar; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  23 in total

1.  Prediction in infants and adults: A pupillometry study.

Authors:  Felicia Zhang; Sagi Jaffe-Dax; Robert C Wilson; Lauren L Emberson
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2018-12-27

Review 2.  A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

3.  Cognitive effort is modulated outside of the explicit awareness of conflict frequency: Evidence from pupillometry.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Diede; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  GANEing traction: The broad applicability of NE hotspots to diverse cognitive and arousal phenomena.

Authors:  Mara Mather; David Clewett; Michiko Sakaki; Carolyn W Harley
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  The Role of Anterior Cingulate Cortex in the Affective Evaluation of Conflict.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Joseph A King; Franziska M Korb; Ruth M Krebs; Wim Notebaert; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Pain or nociception? Subjective experience mediates the effects of acute noxious heat on autonomic responses - corrected and republished.

Authors:  Dominik Mischkowski; Esther E Palacios-Barrios; Lauren Banker; Troy C Dildine; Lauren Y Atlas
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.926

7.  Pain or nociception? Subjective experience mediates the effects of acute noxious heat on autonomic responses.

Authors:  Dominik Mischkowski; Esther E Palacios-Barrios; Lauren Banker; Troy C Dildine; Lauren Y Atlas
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 7.926

8.  The Pupillary Orienting Response Predicts Adaptive Behavioral Adjustment after Errors.

Authors:  Peter R Murphy; Marianne L van Moort; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The sense of should: A biologically-based framework for modeling social pressure.

Authors:  Jordan E Theriault; Liane Young; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Individual differences in eye blink rate predict both transient and tonic pupil responses during reversal learning.

Authors:  Joanne C Van Slooten; Sara Jahfari; Tomas Knapen; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.