AIMS: Obtaining optimal pulmonary vein (PV) occlusion with the endoscopic laser balloon ablation system (EAS) can be difficult, hypothetically influenced by PV geometry. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of PV orientation on atrial fibrillation (AF)-free survival after PV isolation (PVI) using the EAS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-three patients undergoing a single EAS PVI were included. Left atrial electrocardiogram -triggered computed tomography was performed in all patients prior to PVI. Of all four PVs, the orientation at the insertion in the left atrium was measured in both the transverse and frontal plane and assigned to one of the four orientation groups: ventral-caudal, dorsal-caudal, ventral-cranial, and dorsal-cranial. Mean age was 56 years; 86% had paroxysmal AF. Overall, AF-free survival after a median follow-up of 18.2 months was 51.2%. AF-free survival varied between 21 and 88% depending on left upper PV orientation (P = 0.045). Furthermore, AF-free survival varied between 21 and 86% depending on left lower PV orientation (P = 0.010) and AF-free survival varied between 29 and 88% depending on right lower PV orientation (P = 0.053). No association was found between right upper PV orientation and AF-free survival after EAS PVI (P = 0.794). In multivariate analysis, only left lower PV orientation was associated with AF-free survival [hazards ratio (HR) 10.4, P = 0.019]. CONCLUSION: PV orientation is associated with AF-free survival after EAS PVI. PV orientation assessment may be useful for selecting the most suitable patients for EAS PVI. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Obtaining optimal pulmonary vein (PV) occlusion with the endoscopic laser balloon ablation system (EAS) can be difficult, hypothetically influenced by PV geometry. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of PV orientation on atrial fibrillation (AF)-free survival after PV isolation (PVI) using the EAS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-three patients undergoing a single EAS PVI were included. Left atrial electrocardiogram -triggered computed tomography was performed in all patients prior to PVI. Of all four PVs, the orientation at the insertion in the left atrium was measured in both the transverse and frontal plane and assigned to one of the four orientation groups: ventral-caudal, dorsal-caudal, ventral-cranial, and dorsal-cranial. Mean age was 56 years; 86% had paroxysmal AF. Overall, AF-free survival after a median follow-up of 18.2 months was 51.2%. AF-free survival varied between 21 and 88% depending on left upper PV orientation (P = 0.045). Furthermore, AF-free survival varied between 21 and 86% depending on left lower PV orientation (P = 0.010) and AF-free survival varied between 29 and 88% depending on right lower PV orientation (P = 0.053). No association was found between right upper PV orientation and AF-free survival after EAS PVI (P = 0.794). In multivariate analysis, only left lower PV orientation was associated with AF-free survival [hazards ratio (HR) 10.4, P = 0.019]. CONCLUSION: PV orientation is associated with AF-free survival after EAS PVI. PV orientation assessment may be useful for selecting the most suitable patients for EAS PVI. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.