Literature DB >> 25588201

PEDOT-CNT coated electrodes stimulate retinal neurons at low voltage amplitudes and low charge densities.

R Samba1, T Herrmann, G Zeck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare two different microelectrode materials--the conductive polymer composite poly-3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (PEDOT)-carbon nanotube(CNT) and titanium nitride (TiN)--at activating spikes in retinal ganglion cells in whole mount rat retina through stimulation of the local retinal network. Stimulation efficacy of the microelectrodes was analyzed by comparing voltage, current and transferred charge at stimulation threshold. APPROACH: Retinal ganglion cell spikes were recorded by a central electrode (30 μm diameter) in the planar grid of an electrode array. Extracellular stimulation (monophasic, cathodic, 0.1-1.0 ms) of the retinal network was performed using constant voltage pulses applied to the eight surrounding electrodes. The stimulation electrodes were equally spaced on the four sides of a square (400 × 400 μm). Threshold voltage was determined as the pulse amplitude required to evoke network-mediated ganglion cell spiking in a defined post stimulus time window in 50% of identical stimulus repetitions. For the two electrode materials threshold voltage, transferred charge at threshold, maximum current and the residual current at the end of the pulse were compared. MAIN
RESULTS: Stimulation of retinal interneurons using PEDOT-CNT electrodes is achieved with lower stimulation voltage and requires lower charge transfer as compared to TiN. The key parameter for effective stimulation is a constant current over at least 0.5 ms, which is obtained by PEDOT-CNT electrodes at lower stimulation voltage due to its faradaic charge transfer mechanism. SIGNIFICANCE: In neuroprosthetic implants, PEDOT-CNT may allow for smaller electrodes, effective stimulation in a safe voltage regime and lower energy-consumption. Our study also indicates, that the charge transferred at threshold or the charge injection capacity per se does not determine stimulation efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25588201     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/1/016014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  15 in total

1.  Neuro-Nano Interfaces: Utilizing Nano-Coatings and Nanoparticles to Enable Next-Generation Electrophysiological Recording, Neural Stimulation, and Biochemical Modulation.

Authors:  Ashlyn T Young; Neil Cornwell; Michael A Daniele
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 18.808

Review 2.  Bioengineering strategies for restoring vision.

Authors:  Jasmina Cehajic-Kapetanovic; Mandeep S Singh; Eberhart Zrenner; Robert E MacLaren
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 25.671

3.  Carbon nanotube electrodes for retinal implants: A study of structural and functional integration over time.

Authors:  Cyril G Eleftheriou; Jonas B Zimmermann; Henrik D Kjeldsen; Moshe David-Pur; Yael Hanein; Evelyne Sernagor
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Visual Prosthesis: Interfacing Stimulating Electrodes with Retinal Neurons to Restore Vision.

Authors:  Alejandro Barriga-Rivera; Lilach Bareket; Josef Goding; Ulises A Aregueta-Robles; Gregg J Suaning
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  A very large-scale microelectrode array for cellular-resolution electrophysiology.

Authors:  David Tsai; Daniel Sawyer; Adrian Bradd; Rafael Yuste; Kenneth L Shepard
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 6.  Tissue Response to Neural Implants: The Use of Model Systems Toward New Design Solutions of Implantable Microelectrodes.

Authors:  Maurizio Gulino; Donghoon Kim; Salvador Pané; Sofia Duque Santos; Ana Paula Pêgo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Electrical percolation in extrinsically conducting, poly(ε-decalactone) composite neural interface materials.

Authors:  Katarzyna Krukiewicz; James Britton; Daria Więcławska; Małgorzata Skorupa; Jorge Fernandez; Jose-Ramon Sarasua; Manus J P Biggs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Can Nanofluidic Chemical Release Enable Fast, High Resolution Neurotransmitter-Based Neurostimulation?

Authors:  Peter D Jones; Martin Stelzle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  pHEMA Encapsulated PEDOT-PSS-CNT Microsphere Microelectrodes for Recording Single Unit Activity in the Brain.

Authors:  Elisa Castagnola; Emma Maggiolini; Luca Ceseracciu; Francesca Ciarpella; Elena Zucchini; Sara De Faveri; Luciano Fadiga; Davide Ricci
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  In Vivo Neural Recording and Electrochemical Performance of Microelectrode Arrays Modified by Rough-Surfaced AuPt Alloy Nanoparticles with Nanoporosity.

Authors:  Zongya Zhao; Ruxue Gong; Liang Zheng; Jue Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.