Yvonne Jonk1, Karen Lawson, Heidi O'Connor, Kirsten S Riise, David Eisenberg, Bryan Dowd, Mary J Kreitzer. 1. *Center for Rural Health, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND †Center for Spirituality and Healing, School of Nursing ‡Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health §Department of Biobehavioral Health and Population Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN ∥Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA ¶Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health coaching interventions aim to identify high-risk enrollees and encourage them to play a more proactive role in improving their health, improve their ability to navigate the health care system, and reduce costs. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the effect of health coaching on inpatient, emergency room, outpatient, and prescription drug expenditures. RESEARCH DESIGN: Quasiexperimental pre-post design. Health coaching participants were identified over the 2-year time period 2009-2010. Propensity scores facilitated matching eligible participants and nonparticipating controls on a one-to-one basis using nearest kernel techniques. Difference in differences logistic and generalized linear models addressed the impact of health coaching on the probability of incurring costs and levels of inpatient, emergency room, outpatient, and prescription drug expenditures, respectively. MEASURES: Administrative claims data were used to analyze health services expenditures preparticipation and post health coaching participation time periods. RESULTS: Of the 6940 health coaching participants, 1161 participated for at least 4 weeks and had a minimum of 6 months of claims data preparticipation and postparticipation. Although the probability of incurring costs and expenditure levels for emergency room services were not affected, the probability of incurring inpatient expenditures and levels of outpatient and total costs for health coaching participants fell significantly from preparticipation to postparticipation relative to controls. Estimated outpatient and total cost savings were $286 and $412 per person per month, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Health coaching led to significant reductions in outpatient and total expenditures for high-risk plan enrollees. Future studies analyzing both health outcomes and claims data are needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of health coaching in specific populations.
BACKGROUND: Health coaching interventions aim to identify high-risk enrollees and encourage them to play a more proactive role in improving their health, improve their ability to navigate the health care system, and reduce costs. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the effect of health coaching on inpatient, emergency room, outpatient, and prescription drug expenditures. RESEARCH DESIGN: Quasiexperimental pre-post design. Health coaching participants were identified over the 2-year time period 2009-2010. Propensity scores facilitated matching eligible participants and nonparticipating controls on a one-to-one basis using nearest kernel techniques. Difference in differences logistic and generalized linear models addressed the impact of health coaching on the probability of incurring costs and levels of inpatient, emergency room, outpatient, and prescription drug expenditures, respectively. MEASURES: Administrative claims data were used to analyze health services expenditures preparticipation and post health coaching participation time periods. RESULTS: Of the 6940 health coaching participants, 1161 participated for at least 4 weeks and had a minimum of 6 months of claims data preparticipation and postparticipation. Although the probability of incurring costs and expenditure levels for emergency room services were not affected, the probability of incurring inpatient expenditures and levels of outpatient and total costs for health coaching participants fell significantly from preparticipation to postparticipation relative to controls. Estimated outpatient and total cost savings were $286 and $412 per person per month, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Health coaching led to significant reductions in outpatient and total expenditures for high-risk plan enrollees. Future studies analyzing both health outcomes and claims data are needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of health coaching in specific populations.
Authors: Joana Raquel Raposo Dos Santos; Hellen Geremias Dos Santos; Carlos Manuel Matias Dias; Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Derar H Abdel-Qader; Ahmad Z Al Meslamani; Nadia Al Mazrouei; Asma A El-Shara; Husam El Sharu; Eman Merghani Ali; Samah Bahy Mohammed Ebaed; Osama Mohamed Ibrahim Journal: Hosp Pharm Date: 2021-07-10
Authors: Erja Mustonen; Iiris Hörhammer; Pilvikki Absetz; Kristiina Patja; Johanna Lammintakanen; Martti Talja; Risto Kuronen; Miika Linna Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2019-12-29 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Martin Härter; Jörg Dirmaier; Sarah Dwinger; Levente Kriston; Lutz Herbarth; Elisabeth Siegmund-Schultze; Isaac Bermejo; Herbert Matschinger; Dirk Heider; Hans-Helmut König Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 3.240