Literature DB >> 25588070

Expert system for predicting reaction conditions: the Michael reaction case.

G Marcou1, J Aires de Sousa, D A R S Latino, A de Luca, D Horvath, V Rietsch, A Varnek.   

Abstract

A generic chemical transformation may often be achieved under various synthetic conditions. However, for any specific reagents, only one or a few among the reported synthetic protocols may be successful. For example, Michael β-addition reactions may proceed under different choices of solvent (e.g., hydrophobic, aprotic polar, protic) and catalyst (e.g., Brønsted acid, Lewis acid, Lewis base, etc.). Chemoinformatics methods could be efficiently used to establish a relationship between the reagent structures and the required reaction conditions, which would allow synthetic chemists to waste less time and resources in trying out various protocols in search for the appropriate one. In order to address this problem, a number of 2-classes classification models have been built on a set of 198 Michael reactions retrieved from literature. Trained models discriminate between processes that are compatible and respectively processes not feasible under a specific reaction condition option (feasible or not with a Lewis acid catalyst, feasible or not in hydrophobic solvent, etc.). Eight distinct models were built to decide the compatibility of a Michael addition process with each considered reaction condition option, while a ninth model was aimed to predict whether the assumed Michael addition is feasible at all. Different machine-learning methods (Support Vector Machine, Naive Bayes, and Random Forest) in combination with different types of descriptors (ISIDA fragments issued from Condensed Graphs of Reactions, MOLMAP, Electronic Effect Descriptors, and Chemistry Development Kit computed descriptors) have been used. Models have good predictive performance in 3-fold cross-validation done three times: balanced accuracy varies from 0.7 to 1. Developed models are available for the users at http://infochim.u-strasbg.fr/webserv/VSEngine.html . Eventually, these were challenged to predict feasibility conditions for ∼50 novel Michael reactions from the eNovalys database (originally from patent literature).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25588070     DOI: 10.1021/ci500698a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  11 in total

Review 1.  QSAR without borders.

Authors:  Eugene N Muratov; Jürgen Bajorath; Robert P Sheridan; Igor V Tetko; Dmitry Filimonov; Vladimir Poroikov; Tudor I Oprea; Igor I Baskin; Alexandre Varnek; Adrian Roitberg; Olexandr Isayev; Stefano Curtarolo; Denis Fourches; Yoram Cohen; Alan Aspuru-Guzik; David A Winkler; Dimitris Agrafiotis; Artem Cherkasov; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Structure-reactivity modeling using mixture-based representation of chemical reactions.

Authors:  Pavel Polishchuk; Timur Madzhidov; Timur Gimadiev; Andrey Bodrov; Ramil Nugmanov; Alexandre Varnek
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI.

Authors:  Marwin H S Segler; Mike Preuss; Mark P Waller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Unified Deep Learning Model for Multitask Reaction Predictions with Explanation.

Authors:  Jieyu Lu; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Predicting reaction conditions from limited data through active transfer learning.

Authors:  Eunjae Shim; Joshua A Kammeraad; Ziping Xu; Ambuj Tewari; Tim Cernak; Paul M Zimmerman
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 9.969

6.  Discovery of novel chemical reactions by deep generative recurrent neural network.

Authors:  William Bort; Igor I Baskin; Timur Gimadiev; Artem Mukanov; Ramil Nugmanov; Pavel Sidorov; Gilles Marcou; Dragos Horvath; Olga Klimchuk; Timur Madzhidov; Alexandre Varnek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Prediction of Optimal Conditions of Hydrogenation Reaction Using the Likelihood Ranking Approach.

Authors:  Valentina A Afonina; Daniyar A Mazitov; Albina Nurmukhametova; Maxim D Shevelev; Dina A Khasanova; Ramil I Nugmanov; Vladimir A Burilov; Timur I Madzhidov; Alexandre Varnek
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Machine Learning of Reaction Properties via Learned Representations of the Condensed Graph of Reaction.

Authors:  Esther Heid; William H Green
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 6.162

9.  Towards efficient discovery of green synthetic pathways with Monte Carlo tree search and reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Xiaoxue Wang; Yujie Qian; Hanyu Gao; Connor W Coley; Yiming Mo; Regina Barzilay; Klavs F Jensen
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Current and Future Roles of Artificial Intelligence in Medicinal Chemistry Synthesis.

Authors:  Thomas J Struble; Juan C Alvarez; Scott P Brown; Milan Chytil; Justin Cisar; Renee L DesJarlais; Ola Engkvist; Scott A Frank; Daniel R Greve; Daniel J Griffin; Xinjun Hou; Jeffrey W Johannes; Constantine Kreatsoulas; Brian Lahue; Miriam Mathea; Georg Mogk; Christos A Nicolaou; Andrew D Palmer; Daniel J Price; Richard I Robinson; Sebastian Salentin; Li Xing; Tommi Jaakkola; William H Green; Regina Barzilay; Connor W Coley; Klavs F Jensen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 7.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.