Literature DB >> 25587851

A paradigm shift in biomass technology from complete to partial cellulose hydrolysis: lessons learned from nature.

Rachel Chen1.   

Abstract

A key characteristic of current biomass technology is the requirement for complete hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicellulose, which stems from the inability of microbial strains to use partially hydrolyzed cellulose, or cellodextrin. The complete hydrolysis paradigm has been practiced over the past 4 decades with major enzyme companies perfecting their cellulase mix for maximal yield of monosaccharides, with corresponding efforts in strain development focus almost solely on the conversion of monosaccharides, not cellodextrin, to products. While still in its nascent infancy, a new paradigm requiring only partial hydrolysis has begun to take hold, promising a shift in the biomass technology at its fundamental core. The new paradigm has the potential to reduce the requirement for cellulase enzymes in the hydrolysis step and provides new strategies for metabolic engineers, synthetic biologists and alike in engineering fermenting organisms. Several recent publications reveal that microorganisms engineered to metabolize cellodextrins, rather than monomer glucose, can reap significant energy gains in both uptake and subsequent phosphorylation. These energetic benefits can in turn be directed for enhanced robustness and increased productivity of a bioprocess. Furthermore, the new cellodextrin metabolism endows the biocatalyst the ability to evade catabolite repression, a cellular regulatory mechanism that is hampering rapid conversion of biomass sugars to products. Together, the new paradigm offers significant advantages over the old and promises to overcome several critical barriers in biomass technology. More research, however, is needed to realize these promises, especially in discovery and engineering of cellodextrin transporters, in developing a cost-effective method for cellodextrin generation, and in better integration of cellodextrin metabolism to endogenous glycolysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biofuels; biomass technology; cellobiose; cellobiose phosphorylase; cellodextrin; cellodextrin transporter; cellulose hydrolysis; metabolic engineering; synthetic biology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25587851      PMCID: PMC4601324          DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2014.1004019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioengineered        ISSN: 2165-5979            Impact factor:   3.269


  20 in total

Review 1.  A comparative view of metabolite and substrate stress and tolerance in microbial bioprocessing: From biofuels and chemicals, to biocatalysis and bioremediation.

Authors:  Sergios A Nicolaou; Stefan M Gaida; Eleftherios T Papoutsakis
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 9.783

Review 2.  Genomics of cellulosic biofuels.

Authors:  Edward M Rubin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Comparative engineering of Escherichia coli for cellobiose utilization: Hydrolysis versus phosphorolysis.

Authors:  Hyun-Dong Shin; Jianrong Wu; Rachel Chen
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 9.783

4.  Adaptation yields a highly efficient xylose-fermenting Zymomonas mobilis strain.

Authors:  Manoj Agrawal; Zichao Mao; Rachel Ruizhen Chen
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Engineering Escherichia coli cells for cellobiose assimilation through a phosphorolytic mechanism.

Authors:  Ramanan Sekar; Hyun-Dong Shin; Rachel Chen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Improved cellobiose utilization in E. coli by including both hydrolysis and phosphorolysis mechanisms.

Authors:  Charles Rutter; Rachel Chen
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.461

7.  Cellodextrin transporters play important roles in cellulase induction in the cellulolytic fungus Penicillium oxalicum.

Authors:  Jie Li; Guodong Liu; Mei Chen; Zhonghai Li; Yuqi Qin; Yinbo Qu
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Efficient direct ethanol production from cellulose by cellulase- and cellodextrin transporter-co-expressing Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ryosuke Yamada; Yuki Nakatani; Chiaki Ogino; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.298

9.  Third generation biofuels via direct cellulose fermentation.

Authors:  Carlo R Carere; Richard Sparling; Nazim Cicek; David B Levin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 6.208

10.  Overcoming inefficient cellobiose fermentation by cellobiose phosphorylase in the presence of xylose.

Authors:  Kulika Chomvong; Vesna Kordić; Xin Li; Stefan Bauer; Abigail E Gillespie; Suk-Jin Ha; Eun Joong Oh; Jonathan M Galazka; Yong-Su Jin; Jamie H D Cate
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 6.040

View more
  5 in total

1.  A seven-gene cluster in Ruminiclostridium cellulolyticum is essential for signalization, uptake and catabolism of the degradation products of cellulose hydrolysis.

Authors:  Aurélie Fosses; Maria Maté; Nathalie Franche; Nian Liu; Yann Denis; Romain Borne; Pascale de Philip; Henri-Pierre Fierobe; Stéphanie Perret
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 6.040

2.  Biotransformation of d-xylose to d-xylonate coupled to medium-chain-length polyhydroxyalkanoate production in cellobiose-grown Pseudomonas putida EM42.

Authors:  Pavel Dvořák; Jozef Kováč; Víctor de Lorenzo
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 5.813

Review 3.  Genetic modification for enhancing bacterial cellulose production and its applications.

Authors:  Reeta Rani Singhania; Anil Kumar Patel; Mei-Ling Tsai; Chiu-Wen Chen; Cheng Di Dong
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

4.  Bioprocess development of 2, 3-butanediol production using agro-industrial residues.

Authors:  Sulfath Hakkim Hazeena; Narasinha J Shurpali; Henri Siljanen; Reijo Lappalainen; Puthiyamdam Anoop; Velayudhanpillai Prasannakumari Adarsh; Raveendran Sindhu; Ashok Pandey; Parameswaran Binod
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.434

5.  Interplays of enzyme, substrate, and surfactant on hydrolysis of native lignocellulosic biomass.

Authors:  Sengthong Lee; Saengchai Akeprathumchai; Damkerng Bundidamorn; Lakha Salaipeth; Kanokwan Poomputsa; Khanok Ratanakhanokchai; Ken-Lin Chang; Paripok Phitsuwan
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.