Literature DB >> 25587839

Recommendations for adaptation and validation of commercial kits for biomarker quantification in drug development.

Masood U Khan1, Ronald R Bowsher, Mark Cameron, Viswanath Devanarayan, Steve Keller, Lindsay King, Jean Lee, Alyssa Morimoto, Paul Rhyne, Laurie Stephen, Yuling Wu, Timothy Wyant, D Richard Lachno.   

Abstract

Increasingly, commercial immunoassay kits are used to support drug discovery and development. Longitudinally consistent kit performance is crucial, but the degree to which kits and reagents are characterized by manufacturers is not standardized, nor are the approaches by users to adapt them and evaluate their performance through validation prior to use. These factors can negatively impact data quality. This paper offers a systematic approach to assessment, method adaptation and validation of commercial immunoassay kits for quantification of biomarkers in drug development, expanding upon previous publications and guidance. These recommendations aim to standardize and harmonize user practices, contributing to reliable biomarker data from commercial immunoassays, thus, enabling properly informed decisions during drug development.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25587839     DOI: 10.4155/bio.14.274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioanalysis        ISSN: 1757-6180            Impact factor:   2.681


  5 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations for Use and Fit-for-Purpose Validation of Biomarker Multiplex Ligand Binding Assays in Drug Development.

Authors:  Darshana Jani; John Allinson; Flora Berisha; Kyra J Cowan; Viswanath Devanarayan; Carol Gleason; Andreas Jeromin; Steve Keller; Masood U Khan; Bill Nowatzke; Paul Rhyne; Laurie Stephen
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Calculations for Adjusting Endogenous Biomarker Levels During Analytical Recovery Assessments for Ligand-Binding Assay Bioanalytical Method Validation.

Authors:  John F Marcelletti; Cindy L Evans; Manju Saxena; Adriana E Lopez
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Recommendations for Selection and Characterization of Protein Biomarker Assay Calibrator Material.

Authors:  Kyra J Cowan; Lakshmi Amaravadi; Mark J Cameron; Damien Fink; Darshana Jani; Medha Kamat; Lindsay King; Robert J Neely; Yan Ni; Paul Rhyne; Renee Riffon; Yuda Zhu
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  How difficult is the validation of clinical biomarkers?

Authors:  Jan Voskuil
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-04-28

Review 5.  Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease: A View of the Regulatory Science Qualification Landscape from the Coalition Against Major Diseases CSF Biomarker Team.

Authors:  Stephen P Arnerić; Richard Batrla-Utermann; Laurel Beckett; Tobias Bittner; Kaj Blennow; Leslie Carter; Robert Dean; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Just Genius; Mark Forrest Gordon; Janice Hitchcock; June Kaplow; Johan Luthman; Richard Meibach; David Raunig; Klaus Romero; Mahesh N Samtani; Mary Savage; Leslie Shaw; Diane Stephenson; Robert M Umek; Hugo Vanderstichele; Brian Willis; Susan Yule
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.472

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.