| Literature DB >> 25587785 |
Yan Jin1, Hanqing Zhao2, Huizhe Lu3, Colleen M Kuemmel4, Jianjun Zhang5, Daoquan Wang6.
Abstract
A series of novel compounds, namely 1-(diethoxyphosphoryl)-3-(4-ones-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propan-2-yl carboxylic esters, were designed on the basis of the diazafulvene intermediate of imidazole glycerol phosphate dehydratase (IGPD) and high-activity inhibitors of IGPD, and synthesized as inhibitors targeting IGPD in plants. Their structures were confirmed by 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, 31P-NMR and HR-MS. The herbicidal evaluation performed by a Petri dish culture method showed that most compounds possessed moderate to good herbicidal activities. Six compounds were chosen for further herbicidal evaluation on barnyard grass by pot experiments. 1-(Diethoxyphosphoryl)-3-(4-phenyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propan-2-yl 2-(naphthalen-1-yl)acetate (5-A3) and ethyl 1-(2-acetoxy-3-(diethoxyphosphoryl)propyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (5-B4) showed good herbicidal activities. Compared with the compounds with the best herbicidal activity ever reported, both compounds 5-A3 and 5-B4, which can inhibit the growth of barnyard grass at the concentration of 250g/hm2, efficiently gave rise to a nearly 4-fold increase of the herbicidal potency. However, their herbicidal activities were lower than that of acetochlor (62.5 g/hm2) in the pot experiments.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25587785 PMCID: PMC6272695 DOI: 10.3390/molecules20011088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The design of the target molecules.
Scheme 1Synthesis of the target compounds 5.
The percent inhibitory ratios against the growth of root and stalk of wheat and rape of 5 at different concentrations.
| Comp. | R1 | R2 | Relative Inhibition (Root %/Stalk %) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rape Wheat | ||||||
| 100 mg/L | 10 mg/L | 100 mg/L | 10 mg/L | |||
| C6H5- | C6H5- | 87.4/61.3 | 30.3/7.1 | 73.4/63.1 | 24.3/23.3 | |
| C6H5- | 4-NO2C6H4- | 79.2/61.6 | 20.3/11.4 | 78.5/74.5 | 39.2/12.8 | |
| C6H5- | α-C10H7CH2- | 92.5/75.7 | 84.6/64.5 | 69.6/53.6 | 56.9/30.9 | |
| C6H5- | CH3- | 84.0/43.8 | 41.7/11.6 | 66.2/53.7 | 37.0/16.0 | |
| C6H5- | 2-FC6H4- | 89.0/75.0 | 59.8/25.1 | 71.8/51.7 | 36.5/14.0 | |
| C6H5- | 2-ClPy-3- | 90.2/64.0 | 34.5/14.1 | 78.4/70.7 | 32.4/16.6 | |
| C6H5- | 4-OCH3C6H4- | 84.4/57.5 | 34.3/18.1 | 76.8/67.3 | 24.5/12.2 | |
| C6H5- | 3,5-(NO2)2C6H3- | 69.5/21.6 | 26.5/0.0 | 71.3/56.2 | 51.3/37.4 | |
| EtOOC- | C6H5- | 84.2/61.6 | 43.5/25.4 | 75.2/58.5 | 49.7/28.7 | |
| EtOOC- | 4-NO2C6H4- | 84.3/71.2 | 51.0/7.4 | 85.6/72.6 | 49.7/47.9 | |
| EtOOC- | α-C10H7CH2- | 97.7/82.5 | 93.0/68.8 | 95.8/86.7 | 85.0/51.0 | |
| EtOOC- | CH3- | 92.3/75.5 | 43.0/18.9 | 83.9/77.3 | 56.9/40.3 | |
| EtOOC- | 2-FC6H4- | 77.7/50.7 | 34.3/7.4 | 78.3/72.5 | 44.4/30.1 | |
| EtOOC- | 2-ClPy-3- | 75.5/57.8 | 25.5/11.2 | 64.6/44.3 | 5.2/0.0 | |
| EtOOC- | 4-OCH3C6H4- | 62.3/21.9 | 43.7/7.5 | 61.8/47.4 | 12.1/7.4 | |
| EtOOC- | 3,5-(NO2)2C6H3- | 70.6/29.5 | 18.6/-11.8 | 73.2/67.2 | 27.1/5.1 | |
| t-Bu | C6H5- | 89.9/64.7 | 56.6/32.2 | 66.8/47.7 | 32.1/14.1 | |
| t-Bu | 4-NO2C6H4- | 70.2/25.4 | 26.8/11.8 | 86.3/77.7 | 53.6/42.8 | |
| t-Bu | α-C10H7CH2- | 95.8/82.8 | 92.7/64.8 | 90.7/77.0 | 75.4/37.4 | |
| t-Bu | CH3- | 46.3/21.3 | 18.5/-7.2 | 71.3/67.0 | 32.3/16.1 | |
| t-Bu | 2-FC6H4- | 75.4/46.5 | 26.5/0.0 | 75.7/70.3 | 29.9/14.9 | |
| t-Bu | 4-OCH3C6H4- | 84.0/64.5 | 30.9/18.9 | 59.2/51.5 | 24.7/7.1 | |
| t-Bu | 3,5-(NO2)2C6H3- | 70.0/36.3 | 48.8/14.8 | 58.6/44.2 | 32.8/30.5 | |
| ClCH2- | C6H5- | 75.3/57.6 | 25.6/29.4 | 68.7/63.4 | 51.5/40.1 | |
| ClCH2- | 4-NO2C6H4- | 74.4/50.7 | 48.3/32.2 | 76.8/72.8 | 22.7/2.1 | |
| ClCH2- | α-C10H7CH2- | 97.6/86.8 | 93.4/57.8 | 92.1/77.0 | 36.4/9.8 | |
| ClCH2- | CH3- | 77.3/50.5 | 28.5/18.8 | 66.5/60.9 | 22.9/5.0 | |
| ClCH2- | 2-FC6H4- | 64.4/29.6 | 31.3/7.9 | 66.3/53.8 | 20.9/9.2 | |
| ClCH2- | 4-OCH3C6H4- | 82.3/61.7 | 28.7/-4.8 | 63.6/56.2 | 36.0/19.5 | |
| ClCH2- | 3,5-(NO2)2C6H3- | 72.2/32.2 | 34.8/21.3 | 71.6/53.8 | 7.0/7.2 | |
The fresh weight reduction ratios of Barnyard grass at different concentrations of 5.
| Comp. | Fresh Weight Reduction Ratios of Barnyard Grass (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Emergence Treatment | Post-Emergence Treatment | |||||||
| 4 kg/hm2 | 1 kg/hm2 | 250 g/hm2 | 62.5 g/hm2 | 4 kg/hm2 | 1 kg/hm2 | 250 g/hm2 | 62.5 g/hm2 | |
| 99.0 | 99.0 | |||||||
| 40.4 | 13.3 | 4.0 | −2.5 | 99.3 | 93.1 | 79.1 | 68.3 | |
| 51.4 | 30.5 | 11.0 | 4.2 | 68 .1 | 47.1 | 15.7 | 4.6 | |
| 34.3 | 11.8 | 6.2 | 4.8 | 97.6 | 88.1 | 74.8 | 30.7 | |
| 28.7 | 19.0 | 0.0 | −4.1 | 55.1 | 30.9 | 4.1 | 0.0 | |
| 49.8 | 21.4 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 81.0 | 72.0 | 55.5 | 23.1 | |
| 26.9 | 13.3 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 64.1 | 38.4 | 11.0 | 11.4 | |
Figure 2Photographs showing the lateral root and stalk development of dicotyledon rape with compounds 5-A3, 5-B3, 5-C3, 5-D3 at different concentrations.
Figure 3Photographs showing the lateral development of monocotyledon barnyard grass with compounds 5-A3, 5-B4 at different concentrations with a pot experiment.