| Literature DB >> 25587671 |
Kai Bao1, Adam Papadimitropoulos, Baki Akgül, Georgios N Belibasakis, Nagihan Bostanci.
Abstract
Periodontal infection involves a complex interplay between oral biofilms, gingival tissues and cells of the immune system in a dynamic microenvironment. A humanized in vitro model that reduces the need for experimental animal models, while recapitulating key biological events in a periodontal pocket, would constitute a technical advancement in the study of periodontal disease. The aim of this study was to use a dynamic perfusion bioreactor in order to develop a gingival epithelial-fibroblast-monocyte organotypic co-culture on collagen sponges. An 11 species subgingival biofilm was used to challenge the generated tissue in the bioreactor for a period of 24 h. The histological and scanning electron microscopy analysis displayed an epithelial-like layer on the surface of the collagen sponge, supported by the underlying ingrowth of gingival fibroblasts, while monocytic cells were also found within the sponge mass. Bacterial quantification of the biofilm showed that in the presence of the organotypic tissue, the growth of selected biofilm species, especially Campylobacter rectus, Actinomyces oris, Streptococcus anginosus, Veillonella dispar, and Porphyromonas gingivalis, was suppressed, indicating a potential antimicrobial effect by the tissue. Multiplex immunoassay analysis of cytokine secretion showed that interleukin (IL)-1 β, IL-2, IL-4, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels in cell culture supernatants were significantly up-regulated in presence of the biofilm, indicating a positive inflammatory response of the organotypic tissue to the biofilm challenge. In conclusion, this novel host-biofilm interaction organotypic model might resemble the periodontal pocket and have an important impact on the study of periodontal infections, by minimizing the need for the use of experimental animal models.Entities:
Keywords: biofilm; collagen; cytokines; gingival epithelium; gingival fibroblasts; in vitro model; monocytic; multiplex immunoassay, organotypic culture; perfusion bioreactor, periodontal pocket
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25587671 PMCID: PMC4601317 DOI: 10.4161/21505594.2014.978721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virulence ISSN: 2150-5594 Impact factor: 5.882
Figure 2.Masson's trichrome staining used for histological analysis of the collagen sponges, in which the 3D gingival tissue had been reconstructed in vitro. The tissue was co-cultured for 24 h with hydroxyapatite discs without (a) or with the biofilm (b).
Figure 3.SEM images of original collagen sponge structures (a), collagen sponges on which the 3D in vitro gingival tissue had been reconstructed (b), collagen sponges in the presence of biofilms only (c), or collagen sponges on which the 3D in vitro gingival tissue had been reconstructed and challenged with the biofilms for 24 h (d).
Figure 4.Quantification of bacterial numbers in biofilms. The biofilms were either cultured on blank collagen sponges (biofilm), or co-cultured with the 3D in vitro gingival tissue for 24 h (biofilm + cell). These values represent mean values of triplicate experiments ± standard deviation (SD). The results are presented on a logarithmic scale. Asterisk (*) represents the significance of differences (P ≤ 0.05) between the 2 groups.
Figure 5.Quantification of cytokine secretion. The 3D in vitro gingival tissue were cultured either in the presence of only pellicle coated hydroxyapatite discs (cell) or co-cultured with biofilm-grown hydroxyapatite discs (biofilm + cell) for 24 h. These values represent mean values of triplicate experiments ± standard deviation (SD). The results are presented on a logarithmic scale. Asterisk (*) represents the significance of differences (P ≤ 0.05) between the 2 groups.
Figure 1.Schematic representation of the procedure used to establish the biofilm-3D gingival organotypic tissue co-culture model.
Primer sequences and properties
| Organism | Sequence (5′ →3′) | Strand on template | Size of amplicon (bases) | Tm (°C) | Ref # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Streptococcus anginosus | ACCAGGTCTTGACATCCCGATGCTA | + | 76 | 59.25 | |
| CCATGCACCACCTGTCACCGA | − | 59.04 | |||
| Streptococcus oralis | ACCAGGTCTTGACATCCCTCTGACC | + | 70 | 59.42 | |
| ACCACCTGTCACCTCTGTCCCG | − | 59.85 | |||
| Actinomyces oris | GCCTGTCCCTTTGTGGGTGGG | + | 71 | 59.57 | |
| GCGGCTGCTGGCACGTAGTT | − | 60.32 | |||
| Veillonella dispar | CCCGGGCCTTGTACACACCG | + | 62 | 59.7 | |
| CCCACCGGCTTTGGGCACTT | − | 59.83 | |||
| Fusobacterium nucleatum | CGCCCGTCACACCACGAGA | + | 75 | 59.04 | |
| ACACCCTCGGAACATCCCTCCTTAC | − | 59.48 | |||
| Campylobacter rectus | TCACCGCCCGTCACACCATG | + | 57 | 59.35 | |
| CCGGTTTGGTATTTGGGCTTCGAGT | − | 59.5 | |||
| Prevotella intermedia | GCGTGCAGATTGACGGCCCTAT | + | 68 | 59.61 | |
| GGCACACGTGCCCGCTTTACT | − | 60.24 | |||
| Porphyromonas gingivalis | GCGAGAGCCTGAACCAGCCA | + | 90 | 59.07 | |
| ACTCGTATCGCCCGTTATTCCCGTA | − | 59.44 | |||
| Treponema denticola | TAAGGGACAGCTTGCTCACCCCTA | + | 55 | 58.84 | |
| CACCCACGCGTTACTCACCAGTC | − | 59.76 | |||
| Tannerella forsythia | CGATGATACGCGAGGAACCTTACCC | + | 72 | 59.07 | |
| CCGAAGGGAAGAAAGCTCTCACTCT | − | 58.01 | |||
| Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans | GTGGGGAGCAAACAGGATTAG | + | 260 | 58.63 | |
| CCTAAGGCACAAACCCATCTC | − | 58.63 | |||
| Tm, melting temperature |