Literature DB >> 25586973

Comparison of a low-energy diet and a very low-energy diet in sedentary obese individuals: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

P Christensen1, H Bliddal1, B F Riecke1, A R Leeds1, A Astrup1, R Christensen1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: There is no consensus on whether 'very low-energy diets' (VLED; <800 kcal d(-1) ) cause greater weight loss in obese individuals than 'low-energy diets' (LED; 800-1200 kcal d(-1) ). The objective was to determine whether a very low-energy formula diet would cause greater weight loss than a formula 810 kcal d(-1) LED in older sedentary individuals. This is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. INCLUSION CRITERIA: obesity (body mass index [BMI] > 30); age >50 years, with knee osteoarthritis. Participants were randomized to VLED (420-554 kcal d(-1) ) or LED (810 kcal d(-1) ) for 8 weeks, followed by a fixed-energy (1200 kcal d(-1) ) diet with food and two diet products daily for 8 weeks. In all, 192 participants were randomized. Mean age was 63 years (standard deviation: 6), mean weight 103.2 kg (15.0) and BMI of 37.3 kg m(-2) (4.8) at baseline. Mean weight losses in VLED and LED groups were 11.4 kg (standard error: 0.5) and 10.7 kg (0.5) at week 8 and 13.3 kg (0.7) and 12.2 kg (0.6) at week 16. Mean differences between groups were 0.76 kg (95% confidence interval: -0.59 to 2.10; P = 0.27) and 1.08 kg (-0.66 to 2.81; P = 0.22) at 8 and 16 weeks, respectively. Loss of lean body mass was 2.1 kg (0.2) and 1.2 kg (0.4) (17% and 11% of the weight lost, respectively) at week 16 in the VLED and LED group with a mean difference of 0.85 kg (0.01 to 1.69; P = 0.047). Significant adverse effects comparing VLED and LED, were bad breath: 34 (35%) vs. 21 (22%), intolerance to cold: 39 (41%) vs. 17 (18%) and flatulence: 43 (45%) vs. 28 (29%) for VLED and LED at 8 weeks (P < 0.05 in all cases). The VLED and LED regimens were equally successful in inducing weight loss. The significantly lower loss of lean tissue in the LED group together with more frequently reported side effects in the VLED group, favours the choice of low-energy diet (LED) for the treatment of obesity.
© 2011 The Authors. Clinical Obesity © 2011 International Association for the Study of Obesity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LED; Obesity; VLED; weight loss

Year:  2011        PMID: 25586973     DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-8111.2011.00006.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obes        ISSN: 1758-8103


  21 in total

1.  Feasibility and indicative results from a 12-month low-energy liquid diet treatment and maintenance programme for severe obesity.

Authors:  Michael Lean; Naomi Brosnahan; Philip McLoone; Louise McCombie; Anna Bell Higgs; Hazel Ross; Mhairi Mackenzie; Eleanor Grieve; Nick Finer; John Reckless; David Haslam; Billy Sloan; David Morrison
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Effects on body weight, eating behavior, and quality of life of a low-energy diet combined with behavioral group treatment of persons with class II or III obesity: A 2-year pilot study.

Authors:  Jan Karlsson; Marije Galavazi; Stefan Jansson; Johan Jendle
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2020-10-28

3.  Formula food-reducing diets:A new evidence-based addition to the weight management tool box.

Authors:  A R Leeds
Journal:  Nutr Bull       Date:  2014-09

4.  Effect of weight maintenance on symptoms of knee osteoarthritis in obese patients: a twelve-month randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Robin Christensen; Marius Henriksen; Anthony R Leeds; Henrik Gudbergsen; Pia Christensen; Tina J Sørensen; Else M Bartels; Birgit F Riecke; Jens Aaboe; Rikke Frederiksen; Mikael Boesen; L Stefan Lohmander; Arne Astrup; Henning Bliddal
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Intermittent Moderate Energy Restriction Improves Weight Loss Efficiency in Diet-Induced Obese Mice.

Authors:  Radhika V Seimon; Yan-Chuan Shi; Katy Slack; Kailun Lee; Hamish A Fernando; Amy D Nguyen; Lei Zhang; Shu Lin; Ronaldo F Enriquez; Jackie Lau; Herbert Herzog; Amanda Sainsbury
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Cambridge Intensive Weight Management Programme Appears to Promote Weight Loss and Reduce the Need for Bariatric Surgery in Obese Adults.

Authors:  Rajna Golubic; Celia Laur; Megan Kelsey; Alana Livesy; Joanna Hoensch; Adrian Park; Sumantra Ray
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2018-07-12

Review 7.  Defining the Optimal Dietary Approach for Safe, Effective and Sustainable Weight Loss in Overweight and Obese Adults.

Authors:  Chrysi Koliaki; Theodoros Spinos; Μarianna Spinou; Μaria-Eugenia Brinia; Dimitra Mitsopoulou; Nicholas Katsilambros
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-28

8.  Effect of 2 years of calorie restriction on liver biomarkers: results from the CALERIE phase 2 randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  James L Dorling; Eric Ravussin; Leanne M Redman; Manju Bhapkar; Kim M Huffman; Susan B Racette; Sai K Das; John W Apolzan; William E Kraus; Christoph Höchsmann; Corby K Martin
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 9.  A clinical perspective of obesity, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Thang S Han; Mike Ej Lean
Journal:  JRSM Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2016-02-25

Review 10.  Weight losses with low-energy formula diets in obese patients with and without type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  W S Leslie; R Taylor; L Harris; M E J Lean
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 5.095

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.