Literature DB >> 25586877

Natural history of early first-trimester pregnancies implanted in Cesarean scars.

N Zosmer1, J Fuller1, H Shaikh2, J Johns1, J A Ross1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the ultrasound findings and natural history of pregnancies implanted within or on Cesarean section scars in the first trimester of pregnancy.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of 10 women diagnosed with a pregnancy implanted in or on a Cesarean section scar in the first trimester, who declined medical intervention because of their desire to continue the pregnancy. The study population comprised women at < 12 weeks' gestation who were seen in our early pregnancy unit between January 2011 and September 2013. Nine women were followed up by serial ultrasound examinations and had detailed care plans for delivery at King's College Hospital (KCH). One woman was followed up and delivered at another teaching hospital. The first-trimester ultrasound findings were compared with the clinical outcome of the pregnancy.
RESULTS: The nine patients who were followed up at KCH developed ultrasound findings of morbidly adherent placenta (MAP) in the second and third trimesters. All 10 patients were diagnosed with MAP at the time of delivery by Cesarean section. The gestational age at delivery ranged from 26 to 38 weeks. The uterus was conserved in five patients, and Cesarean hysterectomy was performed in the remaining five. All three women with complete implantation of the gestational sac within the scar and two of three cases with placental lakes in the first trimester had hysterectomies. The two cases with bulging of the gestational sac out of the uterine contour had a preterm emergency hysterectomy due to placenta percreta. Histology confirmed placenta accreta in the five hysterectomy specimens. There were no fetal or neonatal complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of a pregnancy on or in a Cesarean section scar is a precursor of MAP; however, the degree of morbidity associated with this implantation is variable and difficult to predict based on first-trimester ultrasound findings only. The assessment of ongoing pregnancies implanted in Cesarean scars is most beneficial when performed between 7 and 9 weeks' gestation. Complete implantation within the myometrial defect, bulging of the trophoblast from the uterine contour and large placental lakes in the first trimester are ultrasound findings that may predict severe placenta accreta or percreta and consequently a poor outcome.
Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section scar pregnancy; morbidly adherent placenta; placenta accreta; placenta previa; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25586877     DOI: 10.1002/uog.14775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  12 in total

1.  Successful pregnancy located in a uterine cesarean scar: A case report.

Authors:  Shoko Tamada; Hisashi Masuyama; Jota Maki; Takeshi Eguchi; Takashi Mitsui; Eriko Eto; Kei Hayata; Yuji Hiramatsu
Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health       Date:  2017-03-23

2.  The potential risk factors of placenta increta and the role of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane.

Authors:  Yan Long; Min Jiang; Fei Gao; Mengru Han; Qiangsheng Gan; Fangling Zeng; Shanshui Zeng; Yanwei Hu; Xianhui Dong; Weitao Ye; Chunyan Zhu; Hongling Yang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  New ultrasound grading system for cesarean scar pregnancy and its implications for management strategies: An observational cohort study.

Authors:  Shin-Yu Lin; Chia-Jung Hsieh; Yi-An Tu; Yi-Ping Li; Chien-Nan Lee; Wen-Wei Hsu; Jin-Chung Shih
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  First Trimester Uterine Rupture: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Fabiana Cecchini; Alice Tassi; Ambrogio P Londero; Giovanni Baccarini; Lorenza Driul; Serena Xodo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Management and reproductive counseling in cervical, caesarean scar and interstitial ectopic pregnancies over 11 years: identifying the need for a modern management algorithm.

Authors:  Jaimin S Shah; Susan Nasab; Ramesha Papanna; Han-Yang Chen; Pamela Promecene; Pamela Berens; Anthony Johnson; Asha Bhalwal
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2019-11-04

6.  Definition and sonographic reporting system for Cesarean scar pregnancy in early gestation: modified Delphi method.

Authors:  I P M Jordans; C Verberkt; R A De Leeuw; C M Bilardo; T Van Den Bosch; T Bourne; H A M Brölmann; M Dueholm; W J K Hehenkamp; N Jastrow; D Jurkovic; A Kaelin Agten; R Mashiach; O Naji; E Pajkrt; D Timmerman; O Vikhareva; L F Van Der Voet; J A F Huirne
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 8.678

7.  Cesarean scar pregnancy with expectant management.

Authors:  Liye Fu; Yingchun Luo; Jinbai Huang
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 1.697

8.  What should we do to optimise outcome in twin pregnancy complicated with placenta percreta? A case report.

Authors:  Mehmet Aral Atalay; Fatma Oz Atalay; Bilge Cetinkaya Demir
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Successfully Managed to Term: When the Patient Is Determined to Keep the Pregnancy.

Authors:  Ranko Kutlesic; Marija Kutlesic; Predrag Vukomanovic; Milan Stefanovic; Danka Mostic-Stanisic
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Combination of medical and surgical management in successful treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: a case report series.

Authors:  Anda Pristavu; Angela Vinturache; Elena Mihalceanu; Radu Pintilie; Mircea Onofriescu; Demetra Socolov
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.