Literature DB >> 25586327

Statistical interactions and Bayes estimation of log odds in case-control studies.

Jaya M Satagopan1, Sara H Olson1, Robert C Elston2.   

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the estimation of the logarithm of disease odds (log odds) when evaluating two risk factors, whether or not interactions are present. Statisticians define interaction as a departure from an additive model on a certain scale of measurement of the outcome. Certain interactions, known as removable interactions, may be eliminated by fitting an additive model under an invertible transformation of the outcome. This can potentially provide more precise estimates of log odds than fitting a model with interaction terms. In practice, we may also encounter nonremovable interactions. The model must then include interaction terms, regardless of the choice of the scale of the outcome. However, in practical settings, we do not know at the outset whether an interaction exists, and if so whether it is removable or nonremovable. Rather than trying to decide on significance levels to test for the existence of removable and nonremovable interactions, we develop a Bayes estimator based on a squared error loss function. We demonstrate the favorable bias-variance trade-offs of our approach using simulations, and provide empirical illustrations using data from three published endometrial cancer case-control studies. The methods are implemented in an R program, and available freely at http://www.mskcc.org/biostatistics/~satagopj .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes estimator; compositional epistasis; logistic link; mean squared error; minimax estimator; nonremovable interaction; removable interaction; transformation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25586327      PMCID: PMC4834280          DOI: 10.1177/0962280214567140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  20 in total

Review 1.  Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn't mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans.

Authors:  Heather J Cordell
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Statistical interaction in human genetics: how should we model it if we are looking for biological interaction?

Authors:  Xuefeng Wang; Robert C Elston; Xiaofeng Zhu
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Commentary: thoughts on assessing evidence for gene by environment interaction.

Authors:  Clarice R Weinberg
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Properties of preliminary test estimators and shrinkage estimators for evaluating multiple exposures - Application to questionnaire data from the 'Study of nevi in children' (SONIC) study.

Authors:  Jaya M Satagopan; Qin Zhou; Susan A Oliveria; Stephen W Dusza; Martin A Weinstock; Marianne Berwick; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 1.864

5.  Evaluation of removable statistical interaction for binary traits.

Authors:  Jaya M Satagopan; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Interaction of soy food and tea consumption with CYP19A1 genetic polymorphisms in the development of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Wang Hong Xu; Qi Dai; Yong Bing Xiang; Ji Rong Long; Zhi Xian Ruan; Jia Rong Cheng; Wei Zheng; Xiao Ou Shu
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Collections of simultaneously altered genes as biomarkers of cancer cell drug response.

Authors:  David L Masica; Rachel Karchin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Diabetes, body size, and risk of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  S M Shoff; P A Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 9.  Detecting gene-gene interactions that underlie human diseases.

Authors:  Heather J Cordell
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells.

Authors:  Mathew J Garnett; Elena J Edelman; Sonja J Heidorn; Chris D Greenman; Anahita Dastur; King Wai Lau; Patricia Greninger; I Richard Thompson; Xi Luo; Jorge Soares; Qingsong Liu; Francesco Iorio; Didier Surdez; Li Chen; Randy J Milano; Graham R Bignell; Ah T Tam; Helen Davies; Jesse A Stevenson; Syd Barthorpe; Stephen R Lutz; Fiona Kogera; Karl Lawrence; Anne McLaren-Douglas; Xeni Mitropoulos; Tatiana Mironenko; Helen Thi; Laura Richardson; Wenjun Zhou; Frances Jewitt; Tinghu Zhang; Patrick O'Brien; Jessica L Boisvert; Stacey Price; Wooyoung Hur; Wanjuan Yang; Xianming Deng; Adam Butler; Hwan Geun Choi; Jae Won Chang; Jose Baselga; Ivan Stamenkovic; Jeffrey A Engelman; Sreenath V Sharma; Olivier Delattre; Julio Saez-Rodriguez; Nathanael S Gray; Jeffrey Settleman; P Andrew Futreal; Daniel A Haber; Michael R Stratton; Sridhar Ramaswamy; Ultan McDermott; Cyril H Benes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sunburn, sun exposure, and sun sensitivity in the Study of Nevi in Children.

Authors:  Jaya M Satagopan; Susan A Oliveria; Arshi Arora; Michael A Marchetti; Irene Orlow; Stephen W Dusza; Martin A Weinstock; Alon Scope; Alan C Geller; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 3.797

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.