Literature DB >> 25586163

Effective UK weight management services for adults.

L McCombie1, M E J Lean, D Haslam.   

Abstract

A number of evidence-based weight management interventions are now available with different models and serving different patient/client groups. While positive outcomes are a key to the decision-making process, so too is the information around how these outcomes were achieved, in what population, how transferable the outcomes would be to the population a service would be aiming to cover and at what cost to the service provider and or the individual. This paper examines all the UK interventions with recent peer-reviewed evidence of their effectiveness in 'realistic' settings and cost-effectiveness, in the context of National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) guidelines. It concludes that the evidence-based approaches allow intervention at different stages in the disease process of obesity, which are effective in different settings. Self-referral to commercial agencies, by individuals with relatively low body mass index (BMI) and few medical complications, is a reasonable first step. For more severely obese individuals (e.g. BMI > 35 kg m(-2) ) requiring more medically complicated care, evidence is largely lacking for these services, but the community-based Counterweight Programme is effective and cost-effective in maintaining weight loss >5 kg up to 2 years for 30-40% of attenders. For more complicated and resistant obesity, referral to a secondary care-based service can generate short-term weight loss, but 12-month data are unavailable.
© 2012 The Authors. Clinical Obesity © 2012 International Association for the Study of Obesity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-effectiveness; obesity; weight loss; weight maintenance

Year:  2012        PMID: 25586163     DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-8111.2012.00049.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obes        ISSN: 1758-8103


  8 in total

Review 1.  Technology-assisted weight loss interventions in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  David M Levine; Stella Savarimuthu; Allison Squires; Joseph Nicholson; Melanie Jay
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Effect of ideal protein versus low-fat diet for weight loss: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Camilo A Fernandez; Kaitlin Potts; Lydia A Bazzano
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2021-10-15

3.  Evaluation of a multidisciplinary Tier 3 weight management service for adults with morbid obesity, or obesity and comorbidities, based in primary care.

Authors:  A Jennings; C A Hughes; B Kumaravel; M O Bachmann; N Steel; M Capehorn; K Cheema
Journal:  Clin Obes       Date:  2014-07-01

Review 4.  Behavioural weight management programmes for adults assessed by trials conducted in everyday contexts: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Hartmann-Boyce; D J Johns; S A Jebb; C Summerbell; P Aveyard
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 9.213

5.  A community pharmacy weight management programme: an evaluation of effectiveness.

Authors:  David Morrison; Philip McLoone; Naomi Brosnahan; Louise McCombie; Andrea Smith; Janie Gordon
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Randomised controlled feasibility trial of a web-based weight management intervention with nurse support for obese patients in primary care.

Authors:  Lucy Yardley; Lisa J Ware; Emily R Smith; Sarah Williams; Katherine J Bradbury; Emily J Arden-Close; Mark A Mullee; Michael V Moore; Janet L Peacock; Mike E J Lean; Barrie M Margetts; Chris D Byrne; Richard F D Hobbs; Paul Little
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Barriers and facilitators to providing primary care-based weight management services in a patient centered medical home for Veterans: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Melanie Jay; Sumana Chintapalli; Allison Squires; Katrina F Mateo; Scott E Sherman; Adina L Kalet
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Exploring the influences on men's engagement with weight loss services: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Megan Elliott; Fiona Gillison; Julie Barnett
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.