Literature DB >> 25585923

Quantifying realized inbreeding in wild and captive animal populations.

U Knief1, G Hemmrich-Stanisak2, M Wittig2, A Franke2, S C Griffith3, B Kempenaers1, W Forstmeier1.   

Abstract

Most molecular measures of inbreeding do not measure inbreeding at the scale that is most relevant for understanding inbreeding depression-namely the proportion of the genome that is identical-by-descent (IBD). The inbreeding coefficient FPed obtained from pedigrees is a valuable estimator of IBD, but pedigrees are not always available, and cannot capture inbreeding loops that reach back in time further than the pedigree. We here propose a molecular approach to quantify the realized proportion of the genome that is IBD (propIBD), and we apply this method to a wild and a captive population of zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). In each of 948 wild and 1057 captive individuals we analyzed available single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data (260 SNPs) spread over four different genomic regions in each population. This allowed us to determine whether any of these four regions was completely homozygous within an individual, which indicates IBD with high confidence. In the highly nomadic wild population, we did not find a single case of IBD, implying that inbreeding must be extremely rare (propIBD=0-0.00094, 95% CI). In the captive population, a five-generation pedigree strongly underestimated the average amount of realized inbreeding (FPed=0.013<propIBD=0.064), as expected given that pedigree founders were already related. We suggest that this SNP-based technique is generally useful for quantifying inbreeding at the individual or population level, and we show analytically that it can capture inbreeding loops that reach back up to a few hundred generations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25585923      PMCID: PMC4359978          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2014.116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  27 in total

1.  Long homozygous chromosomal segments in reference families from the centre d'Etude du polymorphisme humain.

Authors:  K W Broman; J L Weber
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Reconciling the analysis of IBD and IBS in complex trait studies.

Authors:  Joseph E Powell; Peter M Visscher; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations.

Authors:  J R Chapman; S Nakagawa; D W Coltman; J Slate; B C Sheldon
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  A high-density SNP-based linkage map of the chicken genome reveals sequence features correlated with recombination rate.

Authors:  Martien A M Groenen; Per Wahlberg; Mario Foglio; Hans H Cheng; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Francois Besnier; Mark Lathrop; William M Muir; Gane Ka-Shu Wong; Ivo Gut; Leif Andersson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Pedigrees and microsatellites among endangered ungulates: what do they tell us?

Authors:  María José Ruiz-López; Eduardo R S Roldán; Gerardo Espeso; Montserrat Gomendio
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  The recombination landscape of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome.

Authors:  Niclas Backström; Wolfgang Forstmeier; Holger Schielzeth; Harriet Mellenius; Kiwoong Nam; Elisabeth Bolund; Matthew T Webster; Torbjörn Ost; Melanie Schneider; Bart Kempenaers; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Inbreeding depression due to mildly deleterious mutations in finite populations: size does matter.

Authors:  T Bataillon; M Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  QTL linkage mapping of zebra finch beak color shows an oligogenic control of a sexually selected trait.

Authors:  Holger Schielzeth; Bart Kempenaers; Hans Ellegren; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Comparative assessment of methods for estimating individual genome-wide homozygosity-by-descent from human genomic data.

Authors:  Ozren Polasek; Caroline Hayward; Celine Bellenguez; Veronique Vitart; Ivana Kolcić; Ruth McQuillan; Vanja Saftić; Ulf Gyllensten; James F Wilson; Igor Rudan; Alan F Wright; Harry Campbell; Anne-Louise Leutenegger
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Detecting autozygosity through runs of homozygosity: a comparison of three autozygosity detection algorithms.

Authors:  Daniel P Howrigan; Matthew A Simonson; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  12 in total

1.  Pedigree-based inbreeding coefficient explains more variation in fitness than heterozygosity at 160 microsatellites in a wild bird population.

Authors:  Pirmin Nietlisbach; Lukas F Keller; Glauco Camenisch; Frédéric Guillaume; Peter Arcese; Jane M Reid; Erik Postma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Meiotic recombination shapes precision of pedigree- and marker-based estimates of inbreeding.

Authors:  U Knief; B Kempenaers; W Forstmeier
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Neurogenomic insights into the behavioral and vocal development of the zebra finch.

Authors:  Mark E Hauber; Matthew Im Louder; Simon C Griffith
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Low incidence of inbreeding in a long-lived primate population isolated for 75 years.

Authors:  Anja Widdig; Laura Muniz; Mirjam Minkner; Yvonne Barth; Stefanie Bley; Angelina Ruiz-Lambides; Olaf Junge; Roger Mundry; Lars Kulik
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 5.  Genomics advances the study of inbreeding depression in the wild.

Authors:  Marty Kardos; Helen R Taylor; Hans Ellegren; Gordon Luikart; Fred W Allendorf
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Highly Polymorphic Microsatellite Markers for the Assessment of Male Reproductive Skew and Genetic Variation in Critically Endangered Crested Macaques (Macaca nigra).

Authors:  Antje Engelhardt; Laura Muniz; Dyah Perwitasari-Farajallah; Anja Widdig
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  A comparison of pedigree, genetic and genomic estimates of relatedness for informing pairing decisions in two critically endangered birds: Implications for conservation breeding programmes worldwide.

Authors:  Stephanie J Galla; Roger Moraga; Liz Brown; Simone Cleland; Marc P Hoeppner; Richard F Maloney; Anne Richardson; Lyndon Slater; Anna W Santure; Tammy E Steeves
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Inbreeding depression of sperm traits in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata.

Authors:  Pavlína Opatová; Malika Ihle; Jana Albrechtová; Oldřich Tomášek; Bart Kempenaers; Wolfgang Forstmeier; Tomáš Albrecht
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Fitness consequences of polymorphic inversions in the zebra finch genome.

Authors:  Ulrich Knief; Georg Hemmrich-Stanisak; Michael Wittig; Andre Franke; Simon C Griffith; Bart Kempenaers; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Quantitative genetic analyses provide parameters for selection and conservation of captive Great-billed Seed-finches (Sporophila maximiliani).

Authors:  Mário L Santana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.