Kelle M Franklin1, Sheketha R Hauser2, Amy W Lasek3, Jeanette McClintick4,5, Zheng-Ming Ding1, William J McBride1,4, Richard L Bell1. 1. Institute of Psychiatric Research, Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Neuroscience Research Building, 320W. 15th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. 2. Institute of Psychiatric Research, Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Neuroscience Research Building, 320W. 15th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. shhauser@iupui.edu. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. 4. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. 5. Center for Medical Genomics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) and neuroimmune signaling have been posited to regulate alcohol drinking. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the involvement of PDE4 and Il22ra2 on ethanol (EtOH) intake by alcohol-preferring (P) and high-alcohol-drinking (HAD1) rats. METHODS: Exp 1 determined the dose-response effects of PDE4 inhibitors, rolipram, and Ro 20-1724, on 2 h/day free-choice EtOH intake by adult P and HAD1 rats. Exps 2-3 examined the effects of repeated administration with the PDE4 inhibitors on EtOH or sucrose intake and locomotor behavior. Exp 4 determined Pde4-associated gene expression differences in subregions of the extended amygdala, between high- and low-alcohol-consuming rat lines. Exp 5 evaluated the effects of infusing short hairpin RNA to knock down Il22ra2 in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell on a 24-h free-choice EtOH drinking by P rats. RESULTS: Administration of rolipram or Ro 20-1724 reduced EtOH intake by P rats; Ro 20-1724 reduced EtOH intake by HAD1 rats. Repeated rolipram or Ro 20-1724 exposure reduced EtOH intake by P and HAD1 rats. PDE4 inhibition induced motor impairment during the first hour of EtOH intake by P rats. Higher gene expression levels for PDE4A were found in the NAc shell of P vs NP rats. ShRNAs targeting Il22ra2 in the NAc shell significantly reduced chronic EtOH intake. CONCLUSIONS: PDE4 and neuroinflammatory/immune signaling pathways could represent molecular targets for the treatment of alcohol use disorders in genetically predisposed subjects. This study underscores the importance of testing compounds over multiple days and rat lines when determining efficacy to disrupt excessive alcohol intake.
RATIONALE: Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) and neuroimmune signaling have been posited to regulate alcohol drinking. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the involvement of PDE4 and Il22ra2 on ethanol (EtOH) intake by alcohol-preferring (P) and high-alcohol-drinking (HAD1) rats. METHODS:Exp 1 determined the dose-response effects of PDE4 inhibitors, rolipram, and Ro 20-1724, on 2 h/day free-choice EtOH intake by adult P and HAD1 rats. Exps 2-3 examined the effects of repeated administration with the PDE4 inhibitors on EtOH or sucrose intake and locomotor behavior. Exp 4 determined Pde4-associated gene expression differences in subregions of the extended amygdala, between high- and low-alcohol-consuming rat lines. Exp 5 evaluated the effects of infusing short hairpin RNA to knock down Il22ra2 in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell on a 24-h free-choice EtOH drinking by P rats. RESULTS: Administration of rolipram or Ro 20-1724 reduced EtOH intake by P rats; Ro 20-1724 reduced EtOH intake by HAD1 rats. Repeated rolipram or Ro 20-1724 exposure reduced EtOH intake by P and HAD1 rats. PDE4 inhibition induced motor impairment during the first hour of EtOH intake by P rats. Higher gene expression levels for PDE4A were found in the NAc shell of P vs NP rats. ShRNAs targeting Il22ra2 in the NAc shell significantly reduced chronic EtOH intake. CONCLUSIONS: PDE4 and neuroinflammatory/immune signaling pathways could represent molecular targets for the treatment of alcohol use disorders in genetically predisposed subjects. This study underscores the importance of testing compounds over multiple days and rat lines when determining efficacy to disrupt excessive alcohol intake.
Authors: C P Genain; T Roberts; R L Davis; M H Nguyen; A Uccelli; D Faulds; Y Li; J Hedgpeth; S L Hauser Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1995-04-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Giordano de Guglielmo; Dana E Conlisk; Amanda M Barkley-Levenson; Abraham A Palmer; Olivier George Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Yuri A Blednov; Cecilia M Borghese; Michael P Dugan; Swetak Pradhan; Thanvi M Thodati; Nikhita R Kichili; R Adron Harris; Robert O Messing Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Zheng-Ming Ding; Cynthia M Ingraham; Sheketha R Hauser; Amy W Lasek; Richard L Bell; William J McBride Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 3.455