Literature DB >> 25585572

Assessment of obesity beyond body mass index to determine benefit of treatment.

E T Aasheim1, S J B Aylwin, S T Radhakrishnan, A S Sood, A Jovanovic, T Olbers, C W le Roux.   

Abstract

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: •  Weight or weight loss per se may not indicate health status or health benefit. •  There is no gold standard for assessing which patients would benefit most from weight-loss interventions. •  The King's Criteria is one of several recently proposed obesity classification systems. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: •  The King's Criteria can capture health problems related to obesity and health benefits after weight loss. •  The King's Criteria is a reproducible scoring system. •  Using the King's Criteria may help shift the focus of patients and clinicians from weight loss to health gain.
SUMMARY: Body mass index (BMI) alone does not reflect health status in individuals. The King's Obesity Staging Criteria is a clinical tool for the assessment of patients with complex obesity. We assessed the performance of a modified version of the King's Criteria by scoring 144 obese patients before and 1 year after bariatric surgery. We also evaluated inter-observer variability by having 11 clinicians score the same 12 patients. The King's Obesity Staging Criteria comprise nine health domains: Airways, Body mass index, Cardiovascular disease, Diabetes, Economic complications, Functional limitations, Gonadal axis, Health status (perceived), and body Image. For each domain, a person's health is assigned a score of 0 ('normal health'), 1 ('at risk'), 2 ('established disease') or 3 ('advanced disease'). The patient's mean BMI decreased from 48 ± 7 to 37 ± 7 kg m(-2) post surgery. Before surgery, 84% of patients were either in stage 2 ('established disease') or stage 3 ('advanced disease') for one or more domains other than BMI. The modified King's Criteria showed significant health improvements after surgery, with a higher proportion of patients scored in stage 0 ('normal health') within each health domain (P < 0.001 for all). Observers assigned the same score in >75% of cases for all domains except Health status perceived (71%) and body Image (65%). In conclusion the King's Criteria captured morbidity in obese patients and health gains after weight loss. Different clinicians mostly assigned similar scores. The King's Criteria is a clinical tool that may help shift the focus of patients and clinicians towards improving health and not only losing weight. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01112228 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
© 2011 The Authors. Clinical Obesity © 2011 International Association for the Study of Obesity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; morbid obesity; staging; treatment.

Year:  2011        PMID: 25585572     DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-8111.2011.00017.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obes        ISSN: 1758-8103


  14 in total

1.  Association of body mass index (BMI) and percent body fat among BMI-defined non-obese middle-aged individuals: Insights from a population-based Canadian sample.

Authors:  Kelsey H Collins; Behnam Sharif; Claudia Sanmartin; Raylene A Reimer; Walter Herzog; Rick Chin; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2017-03-01

Review 2.  Disease severity and staging of obesity: a rational approach to patient selection.

Authors:  M B Whyte; S Velusamy; S J B Aylwin
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  Obesity as a Disease: Current Policies and Implications for the Future.

Authors:  Scott Kahan; Tracy Zvenyach
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2016-06

4.  Managing obesity in people with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Bonnie Grant; Michele Sandelson; Bernice Agyemang-Prempeh; Anjali Zalin
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.659

5.  LAP-BAND for BMI 30-40: 5-year health outcomes from the multicenter pivotal study.

Authors:  J B Dixon; L L Eaton; V Vincent; R Michaelson
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 6.  Obesity Surgery Score (OSS) for Prioritization in the Bariatric Surgery Waiting List: a Need of Public Health Systems and a Literature Review.

Authors:  José Antonio Casimiro Pérez; Carlos Fernández Quesada; María Del Val Groba Marco; Iván Arteaga González; Francisco Cruz Benavides; Jaime Ponce; Pedro de Pablos Velasco; Joaquín Marchena Gómez
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Lysosomal hydrolases of the epidermis. I. Glycosidases.

Authors:  P D Mier; J J van den Hurk
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 8.  The Bariatric-Metabolic Physician's Role in Managing Clinically Severe Obesity.

Authors:  Claudia Coelho; James Crane; Rachel Agius; Barbara McGowan
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2021-05-08

9.  The association between severity of King's Obesity Staging Criteria scores and treatment choice in patients with morbid obesity: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tone G Valderhaug; Erlend T Aasheim; Rune Sandbu; Gunn S Jakobsen; Milada C Småstuen; Jens K Hertel; Jøran Hjelmesæth
Journal:  BMC Obes       Date:  2016-12-07

10.  Beyond weight loss: evaluating the multiple benefits of bariatric surgery after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and adjustable gastric band.

Authors:  Karl J Neff; Ling Ling Chuah; Erlend T Aasheim; Sabrina Jackson; Sukhpreet S Dubb; Shiva T Radhakrishnan; Arvinder S Sood; Torsten Olbers; Ian F Godsland; Alexander D Miras; Carel W le Roux
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.