Robert K Bolan1, Matthew R Beymer, Robert E Weiss, Risa P Flynn, Arleen A Leibowitz, Jeffrey D Klausner. 1. From the *Los Angeles LGBT Center (The Center), Los Angeles, CA; and †Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, ‡Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, §Luskin School of Public Affairs, and ¶Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Incident syphilis infections continue to be especially prevalent among a core group of HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM). Because of synergy between syphilis and HIV infections, innovative means for controlling incident syphilis infections are needed. METHODS:Thirty MSM who had syphilis twice or more since their HIV diagnosis were randomized to receive either daily doxycycline prophylaxis or contingency management (CM) with incentive payments for remaining free of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Participants were tested for the bacterial STDs gonorrhea (Neisseria gonorrhoeae), chlamydia (Chlamydia trachomatis) and syphilis at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 and completed a behavioral risk questionnaire during each visit to assess number of partners, condom use, and drug use since the last visit. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze differences between arms in STD incidence and risk behaviors at follow-up. RESULTS:Doxycycline arm participants were significantly less likely to test positive for any selected bacterial STD during 48 weeks of follow-up (odds ratio, 0.27; confidence interval, 0.09-0.83) compared with CM arm participants (P = 0.02).There were no significant self-reported risk behavior differences between the doxycycline and CM arms at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Daily doxycycline taken prophylactically was associated with a decreased incidence of N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, or syphilis incident infections among a core group of HIV-infected MSM at high risk for these infections. Safe and effective biomedical tools should be included in the efforts to control transmission of syphilis, especially in this population. A randomized clinical trial should be conducted to confirm and extend these findings.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Incident syphilis infections continue to be especially prevalent among a core group of HIV-infectedmen who have sex with men (MSM). Because of synergy between syphilis and HIV infections, innovative means for controlling incident syphilis infections are needed. METHODS: Thirty MSM who had syphilis twice or more since their HIV diagnosis were randomized to receive either daily doxycycline prophylaxis or contingency management (CM) with incentive payments for remaining free of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Participants were tested for the bacterial STDs gonorrhea (Neisseria gonorrhoeae), chlamydia (Chlamydia trachomatis) and syphilis at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 and completed a behavioral risk questionnaire during each visit to assess number of partners, condom use, and drug use since the last visit. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze differences between arms in STD incidence and risk behaviors at follow-up. RESULTS:Doxycycline arm participants were significantly less likely to test positive for any selected bacterial STD during 48 weeks of follow-up (odds ratio, 0.27; confidence interval, 0.09-0.83) compared with CM arm participants (P = 0.02).There were no significant self-reported risk behavior differences between the doxycycline and CM arms at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Daily doxycycline taken prophylactically was associated with a decreased incidence of N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, or syphilis incident infections among a core group of HIV-infected MSM at high risk for these infections. Safe and effective biomedical tools should be included in the efforts to control transmission of syphilis, especially in this population. A randomized clinical trial should be conducted to confirm and extend these findings.
Authors: Catherine Liu; Arnold Bayer; Sara E Cosgrove; Robert S Daum; Scott K Fridkin; Rachel J Gorwitz; Sheldon L Kaplan; Adolf W Karchmer; Donald P Levine; Barbara E Murray; Michael J Rybak; David A Talan; Henry F Chambers Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-01-04 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Witold Jarzebowski; Eric Caumes; Nicolas Dupin; David Farhi; Anne-Sophie Lascaux; Christophe Piketty; Pierre de Truchis; Marie-Anne Bouldouyre; Ouda Derradji; Jérome Pacanowski; Dominique Costagliola; Sophie Grabar Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-09-10
Authors: Pamina M Gorbach; Robert E Weiss; Robin Jeffries; Marjan Javanbakht; Lydia N Drumright; Eric S Daar; Susan J Little Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Vu Quoc Binh; Nguyen Trong Chinh; Nguyen Xuan Thanh; Bui Tri Cuong; Nguyen Ngoc Quang; Bui Dai; Thomas Travers; Michael D Edstein Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: E T Takafuji; J W Kirkpatrick; R N Miller; J J Karwacki; P W Kelley; M R Gray; K M McNeill; H L Timboe; R E Kane; J L Sanchez Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1984-02-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew A Spinelli; Hyman M Scott; Eric Vittinghoff; Albert Y Liu; Kenneth Coleman; Susan P Buchbinder Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Lao-Tzu Allan-Blitz; Segundo R Leon; Claire C Bristow; Kelika A Konda; Silver K Vargas; Juan A Flores; Brandon J Brown; Carlos F Caceres; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2016-07-10 Impact factor: 1.359