Literature DB >> 25584350

Inequity in hospitalization care: a study on utilization of healthcare services in West Bengal, India.

Montu Bose1, Arijita Dutta2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Out of eight commonly agreed Millennium Development Goals (MDG), six are related to the attainment of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) throughout the globe. This universalization of health status suggests policies to narrow the gap in access and benefit sharing between different socially and economically underprivileged classes with that of the better placed ones and a consequent expansion of subsidized healthcare appears to be a common feature for most of the developing nations. The National Health Policy in India (2002) suggests expansion of market-based care for the affording class and subsidized care for the deserving class of the society. So, the benefit distribution of this limited public support in health sector is important to examine to study the welfare consequences of the policy. This paper examines the nature of utilization to inpatient care by different socio-economic groups across regions and gender in West Bengal (WB), India. The benefit incidence of public subsidies across these socio-economic groups has also been verified for different types of services like medicines, diagnostics and professional care etc.
METHODS: National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) has collected information on all hospitalized cases (60(th) round, 2004) with a recall period of 365 days from the sampled households through stratified random sampling technique. The data has been used to assess utilization of healthcare services during hospitalization and the distribution of public subsidies among the patients of different socio-economic background; a Benefit Incidence Analysis (BIA) has also been carried out.
RESULTS: Analysis shows that though the rate of utilization of public hospitals is quite high, other complementary services like medicine, doctor and diagnostic tests are mostly purchased from private market. This leads to high Out-of-Pocket (OOP) expenditure. Moreover, BIA reveals that the public subsidies are mostly enjoyed by the relatively better placed patients, both socially and economically. The worse situation is observed for gender related inequality in access and benefit from public subsidies in the state.
CONCLUSION: Focused policies are required to ensure proper distribution of public subsidies to arrest high OOP expenditure. Drastic change in policy targeting is needed to secure equity without compromising efficiency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Access to Hospitalization Care; Benefit Incidence Analysis (BIA); Inequity; Universal Health Coverage (UHC); Utilization of Healthcare Services

Year:  2014        PMID: 25584350      PMCID: PMC4289034          DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag        ISSN: 2322-5939


  13 in total

1.  Equity of access to health care: outlining the foundations for action.

Authors:  Adam Oliver; Elias Mossialos
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Benefit-incidence analysis of government spending on Ministry of Health outpatient services in Jordan.

Authors:  Y Halasa; H Nassar; H Zaky
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.628

3.  Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and access to health care.

Authors:  James B Kirby; Toshiko Kaneda
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2005-03

Review 4.  Inequality and access to health care.

Authors:  K Davis
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Insured yet vulnerable: out-of-pocket payments and India's poor.

Authors:  Renu Shahrawat; Krishna D Rao
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.344

6.  A framework for the study of access to medical care.

Authors:  L A Aday; R Andersen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Who gains, who loses and how: leveraging gender and class intersections to secure health entitlements.

Authors:  Gita Sen; Aditi Iyer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction.

Authors:  R Penchansky; J W Thomas
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Health care inequities in north India: role of public sector in universalizing health care.

Authors:  Shankar Prinja; Panos Kanavos; Rajesh Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Inequities in access to health care in different health systems: a study in municipalities of central Colombia and north-eastern Brazil.

Authors:  Irene Garcia-Subirats; Ingrid Vargas; Amparo Susana Mogollón-Pérez; Pierre De Paepe; Maria Rejane Ferreira da Silva; Jean Pierre Unger; Carme Borrell; Maria Luisa Vázquez
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2014-01-31
View more
  9 in total

1.  Are cesarean deliveries equitable in India: assessment using benefit incidence analysis.

Authors:  Rajeev Ranjan Singh; Suyash Mishra; Sanjay K Mohanty
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  The effect of a community-based health insurance on the out-of-pocket payments for utilizing medically trained providers in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Jahangir A M Khan; Sayem Ahmed; Marufa Sultana; Abdur Razzaque Sarker; Sanchita Chakrovorty; Mohammad Hafizur Rahman; Ziaul Islam; Clas Rehnberg; Louis W Niessen
Journal:  Int Health       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.473

3.  Health financing strategies to reduce out-of-pocket burden in India: a comparative study of three states.

Authors:  Montu Bose; Arijita Dutta
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Household Registration System, Migration, and Inequity in Healthcare Access.

Authors:  Bocong Yuan; Jiannan Li; Zhaoguo Wang; Lily Wu
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-11

5.  Equity in distribution of public subsidy for noncommunicable diseases among the elderly in India: an application of benefit incidence analysis.

Authors:  Montu Bose; Somdutta Banerjee
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Comparison of out-of-pocket expenditure and catastrophic health expenditure for severe disease by the health security system: based on end-stage renal disease in South Korea.

Authors:  Sun Mi Shin; Hee Woo Lee
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2021-01-06

7.  Understanding equity of institutional delivery in public health centre by level of care in India: an assessment using benefit incidence analysis.

Authors:  Sanjay K Mohanty; Radhe Shyam Mishra; Suyash Mishra; Soumendu Sen
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2020-12-09

8.  Does the implementation of UHC reforms foster greater equality in health spending? Evidence from a benefit incidence analysis in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Manuela De Allegri; Martin Rudasingwa; Edmund Yeboah; Emmanuel Bonnet; Paul André Somé; Valéry Ridde
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-12

9.  Factors affecting the healthcare utilization from Shasthyo Suroksha Karmasuchi scheme among the below-poverty-line population in one subdistrict in Bangladesh: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Md Zahid Hasan; Mohammad Wahid Ahmed; Gazi Golam Mehdi; Jahangir A M Khan; Ziaul Islam; Mahbub Elahi Chowdhury; Sayem Ahmed
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.908

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.