Literature DB >> 25584242

Evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of cefotaxime and sulbactam versus cefepime and tazobactam in patients of urinary tract infection-a prospective comparative study.

Kamalpreet Kaur1, Anita Gupta2, Amarjeet Sharma3, Geeta Walia4, Bikramdeep Singh5, Kiranpreet Kaur6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the third most common infection experienced by humans after respiratory and gastro-intestinal infections. Cephalosporins are now widely been used in UTI, but emerging resistance is a problem to that. Our study aims at evaluating efficacy and safety of third generation cephalosporin combined with beta lactamase inhibitors compared with fourth generation cephalosporin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present, open, randomised, parallel group comparative study includes 60 patients of urinary tract infection. Group A patient were put on treatment regimen of cefotaxime and sulbactam (0.5-2 gms IV/IM BD) and Group B patients were prescribed cefepime and tazobactam (0.5-1 gm IV/IM BD) depending upon urine culture and sensitivity pattern of causative agent and condition of the patient. Bacteriological cure rate, clinical cure rate will be assessed for efficacy and adverse drug reaction (ADR) recorded for evaluating safety.
RESULTS: The study showed a male predominance with 37 males (61.6%) and 23 (38.4%) females out of the total 60 patients with a maximum number within the age group of 50-70., and the most common organism isolated was E coli (73.3%), in rest of the patients Klebsiella (13.33%), Proteus (6.66%), and Staphylococcus (6.66%) were isolated. The overall bacteriological cure rate, in the present study, with cefotaxime/sulbactam and cefepime/tazobactam was 86.5%±6.5 and 93.3%±6.7 respectively. The clinical cure rate post five days of therapay, in goup A1 was 79.03%±2.82 and the same in group B1 was 87% ± 2.11. The clinical cure rate post ten days of therapy in group A2 98.57±0.03 and the same in group B2was 100%. Overall success rate as evaluated by our data in the present study in group A i.e those treated with cefotaxime/sulbactam was 89.28±9.1% and in group B i.e. those treated with cefepime/ tazobactam and 94.49±5.06%.
CONCLUSION: From the present study, those drugs in both generations of cephalosporins combined with beta lactamase inhibitors cefotaxime/sulbactam and cefepime/tazobactam were equally effective and well tolerated in the treatment of UTI. However the cost effectiveness and safety parameters are the important deciding factors for prescribing the same.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cephalosporins; Resistance; Urinary tract infection

Year:  2014        PMID: 25584242      PMCID: PMC4290261          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9742.5090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  20 in total

1.  An epidemic of urinary tract infections?

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The urethral catheter and urinary tract infection.

Authors:  M TURCK; B GOFFE; R G PETERSDORF
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1962-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Resistance in gram-negative bacteria: Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  David L Paterson
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 4.  Cefotaxime. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use.

Authors:  P A Todd; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Adhesion and entry of uropathogenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Matthew A Mulvey
Journal:  Cell Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.715

6.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of tazobactam administered alone and with piperacillin.

Authors:  R Wise; M Logan; M Cooper; J M Andrews
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Management of lower urinary tract infection in women by Slovene GPs.

Authors:  Josip Car; Igor Svab; Janko Kersnik; Miljana Vegnuti
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 8.  Urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Dimitri M Drekonja; James R Johnson
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.907

Review 9.  Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs.

Authors:  Betsy Foxman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2002-07-08       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 10.  Efficacy and safety of cefepime: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dafna Yahav; Mical Paul; Abigail Fraser; Nadav Sarid; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 25.071

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Community acquired urinary tract infections - association with risk factors : Changes in causative organisms and resistance over time].

Authors:  B Ubrig; M Böhme; A Merklinghaus; F Wagenlehner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Case Report: First Case of Cefotaxime-Sulbactam-Induced Acute Intravascular Hemolysis in a Newborn With ABO Blood Type Incompatibility by the Mechanism of Non-Immunologic Protein Adsorption.

Authors:  Yuanjun Wu; Yong Wu; Yong Yang; Baochan Chen; Jianqun Li; Ganping Guo; Fu Xiong
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 7.561

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.