| Literature DB >> 25583864 |
I Antoniadou1, N Dervilis2, E Papatheou2, A E Maguire3, K Worden2.
Abstract
Wind power has expanded significantly over the past years, although reliability of wind turbine systems, especially of offshore wind turbines, has been many times unsatisfactory in the past. Wind turbine failures are equivalent to crucial financial losses. Therefore, creating and applying strategies that improve the reliability of their components is important for a successful implementation of such systems. Structural health monitoring (SHM) addresses these problems through the monitoring of parameters indicative of the state of the structure examined. Condition monitoring (CM), on the other hand, can be seen as a specialized area of the SHM community that aims at damage detection of, particularly, rotating machinery. The paper is divided into two parts: in the first part, advanced signal processing and machine learning methods are discussed for SHM and CM on wind turbine gearbox and blade damage detection examples. In the second part, an initial exploration of supervisor control and data acquisition systems data of an offshore wind farm is presented, and data-driven approaches are proposed for detecting abnormal behaviour of wind turbines. It is shown that the advanced signal processing methods discussed are effective and that it is important to adopt these SHM strategies in the wind energy sector.Entities:
Keywords: condition monitoring; data analysis; offshore wind turbines; structural health monitoring
Year: 2015 PMID: 25583864 PMCID: PMC4290406 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci ISSN: 1364-503X Impact factor: 4.226
Figure 1.The Hilbert spectra of gearbox datasets at three different dates: (a) shows the spectra of 31 October 2009, (b) shows the spectra of 11 February 2010 and (c) of 4 April 2010. The horizontal axis shows the sample point, and the vertical axis shows the instantaneous frequency.
Figure 2.Power of the second IMF of the gearbox datasets. (a) Dataset 31 October 2009. (b) Dataset 11 February 2010. (c) Dataset 4 April 2010.
Figure 3.Wind turbine blade experiment under continuous fatigue loading [3].
Figure 4.Lillgrund wind farm and the distribution of the wind turbines [65].
Figure 5.Results of the population-based approach using neural networks on the wind farm SCADA data. (a) Confusion matrix with MSE errors created from the neural networks—testing set. (b) Average MSE error showing how well neural networks trained to predict the power produced in each turbine, predict the produced power in the rest of the turbines.
Figure 6.Results of the population-based approach using Gaussian processes on the wind farm SCADA data. (a) Confusion matrix with MSE errors created from the Gaussian processes—testing set. (b) Average MSE error showing how well each turbine (power produced) is predicted by the others—Gaussian processes.