Literature DB >> 25583727

Lung concentrations of ceftazidime administered by continuous versus intermittent infusion in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Joël Cousson1, Thierry Floch2, Thomas Guillard3, Véronique Vernet3, Pascal Raclot2, Aurore Wolak-Thierry4, Damien Jolly5.   

Abstract

Ceftazidime is a beta-lactam compound that exerts a time-dependent bactericidal effect. Numerous arguments are in favor of continuous administration of ceftazidime, both for reasons of clinical efficacy and to preserve bacteriological mutation. We report a prospective, single-center, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial comparing two modes of administration of ceftazidime, namely, continuous administration (loading dose of 20 mg/kg of body weight followed by 60 mg/kg/day) versus intermittent administration (20 mg/kg over 30 min every 8 h) in 34 patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia due to Gram-negative bacilli. The study was performed over 48 h with 13 and 18 assessments of serum ceftazidime in the continuous-infusion group (group A) and the intermittent-fusion group (group B), respectively. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed at steady state in both groups at 44 h to determine ceftazidime levels in the epithelial lining fluid. We chose a predefined threshold of 20 mg/liter for serum concentrations of ceftazidime because of ecological conditions in our center. The median time above 20 mg/liter (T>20 mg) was 100% in group A versus 46% in group B. In group A, 14/17 patients had 100% T>20 mg, versus only 1/17 patients in group B. In the epithelial lining fluid, the median concentration of ceftazidime was 12 mg/liter in group A versus 6 mg/liter in group B. A threshold of 8 mg/liter in the epithelial lining fluid was achieved twice as often in group A as in group B. This study of ceftazidime concentrations in the epithelial lining fluid indicates that continuous infusion presents advantages in terms of pharmacodynamics and predictable efficacy in patients presenting ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25583727      PMCID: PMC4356804          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.04232-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  16 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in serum and peritoneal exudate during continuous versus intermittent administration to patients with severe intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  S L C E Buijk; I C Gyssens; J W Mouton; A Van Vliet; H A Verbrugh; H A Bruining
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of activity of ceftazidime during continuous and intermittent infusion.

Authors:  J W Mouton; A A Vinks; N C Punt
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Intermittent bolus dosing of ceftazidime in critically ill patients.

Authors:  R J Young; J Lipman; T Gin; C D Gomersall; G M Joynt; T E Oh
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Editorial commentary: Are blood concentrations enough for establishing pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships?

Authors:  William A Craig
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men.

Authors:  W A Craig
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Comparison of clinical cure rates in adults with ventilator-associated pneumonia treated with intravenous ceftazidime administered by continuous or intermittent infusion: a retrospective, nonrandomized, open-label, historical chart review.

Authors:  Leonardo Lorente; Alejandro Jiménez; Salome Palmero; Juan José Jiménez; José Luís Iribarren; Melitón Santana; María M Martín; Maria L Mora
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Continuous infusion versus intermittent administration of ceftazidime in critically ill patients with suspected gram-negative infections.

Authors:  A S Benko; D M Cappelletty; J A Kruse; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Population pharmacokinetic comparison and pharmacodynamic breakpoints of ceftazidime in cystic fibrosis patients and healthy volunteers.

Authors:  J B Bulitta; C B Landersdorfer; S J Hüttner; G L Drusano; M Kinzig; U Holzgrabe; U Stephan; F Sörgel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Plasma and lung concentrations of ceftazidime administered in continuous infusion to critically ill patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia.

Authors:  Emmanuel Boselli; Dominique Breilh; Thomas Rimmelé; Jean-Charles Poupelin; Marie-Claude Saux; Dominique Chassard; Bernard Allaouchiche
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Altered pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in critically ill patients.

Authors:  C M Gómez; J J Cordingly; M G Palazzo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  8 in total

1.  Continuous infusion of β-lactam antibiotics for all critically ill patients?

Authors:  Fabio S Taccone; Kevin B Laupland; Philippe Montravers
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Continuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Bolus of Beta-Lactams in Critically Ill Patients with Respiratory Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Young R Lee; Pamela D Miller; Saeed K Alzghari; Delilah D Blanco; Jackson D Hager; Kailey S Kuntz
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.441

3.  Simulated Intravenous versus Inhaled Tobramycin with or without Intravenous Ceftazidime Evaluated against Hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa via a Dynamic Biofilm Model and Mechanism-Based Modeling.

Authors:  Hajira Bilal; Jessica R Tait; Yinzhi Lang; Jieqiang Zhou; Phillip J Bergen; Anton Y Peleg; Jürgen B Bulitta; Antonio Oliver; Roger L Nation; Cornelia B Landersdorfer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.938

Review 4.  Optimal infusion rate in antimicrobial therapy explosion of evidence in the last five years.

Authors:  Ling-Ling Zhu; Quan Zhou
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 5.  Penetration of Antibacterial Agents into Pulmonary Epithelial Lining Fluid: An Update.

Authors:  Emily N Drwiega; Keith A Rodvold
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Intrapulmonary Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation of Cefiderocol, a Parenteral Siderophore Cephalosporin, in Patients With Pneumonia and Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Nao Kawaguchi; Takayuki Katsube; Roger Echols; Toshihiro Wajima; David P Nicolau
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Dose optimization of β-lactams antibiotics in pediatrics and adults: A systematic review.

Authors:  Abdul Haseeb; Hani Saleh Faidah; Saleh Alghamdi; Amal F Alotaibi; Mahmoud Essam Elrggal; Ahmad J Mahrous; Safa S Almarzoky Abuhussain; Najla A Obaid; Manal Algethamy; Abdullmoin AlQarni; Asim A Khogeer; Zikria Saleem; Muhammad Shahid Iqbal; Sami S Ashgar; Rozan Mohammad Radwan; Alaa Mutlaq; Nayyra Fatani; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics issues relevant for the clinical use of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Rui Pedro Veiga; José-Artur Paiva
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 9.097

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.