Literature DB >> 25583637

Transcalvarial brain herniation volume after decompressive craniectomy is the difference between two spherical caps.

Chun-Chih Liao1, Yi-Hsin Tsai2, Yi-Long Chen3, Ke-Chun Huang4, I-Jen Chiang5, Jau-Min Wong4, Furen Xiao6.   

Abstract

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a surgical procedure used to relieve severely increased intracranial pressure (ICP) by removing a portion of the skull. Following DC, the brain expands through the skull defect created by DC, resulting in transcalvarial herniation (TCH). Traditionally, people measure only changes in the ICP but not in the intracranial volume (ICV), which is equivalent to the volume of TCH (V(TCH)), in patients undergoing DC. We constructed a simple model of the cerebral hemispheres, assuming the shape of the upper half of a sphere with a radius of 8 cm. We hypothesized that the herniated brain following DC also conforms to the shape of a spherical cap. Considering that a circular piece of the skull with a radius of a was removed, V(TCH) is the volume difference between 2 spherical caps at the operated side and the corresponding non-operated side, which represents the pre-DC volume underneath the removed skull due to the bilateral symmetry of the skull and the brain. Subsequently, we hypothesized that the maximal extent of TCH depends on a because of the biomechanical limitations imposed by the inelastic scalp. The maximum value of V(TCH) is 365.0 mL when a is 7.05 cm and the height difference between the spherical caps (Δh) at its maximum is 2.83 cm. To facilitate rapid calculation of V(TCH), we proposed a simplified estimation formula, Vˆ(TCH)=1/2A(2)Δh, where A=2a. With the a value ranging between 0 and 7 cm, the ratio between Vˆ(TCH) and V(TCH) ranges between 0.77 and 1.27, with different Δh values. For elliptical skull defects with base diameters of A and C, the formula changes to Vˆ(TCH)=1/2ACΔh. If our hypothesis is correct, surgeons can accurately calculate V(TCH) after DC. Furthermore, this can facilitate volumetric comparisons between the effects of DCs in skulls of varying sizes, allowing quantitative comparisons between ICVs in addition to ICPs.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25583637     DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


  3 in total

1.  Absorbable Artificial Dura Versus Nonabsorbable Artificial Dura in Decompressive Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Two Centers.

Authors:  Zhong-Ding Zhang; Li-Yan Zhao; Yi-Ru Liu; Jing-Yu Zhang; Shang-Hui Xie; Yan-Qi Lin; Zhuo-Ning Tang; Huang-Yi Fang; Yue Yang; Shi-Ze Li; Jian-Xi Liu; Han-Song Sheng
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 2.  Brain Midline Shift Measurement and Its Automation: A Review of Techniques and Algorithms.

Authors:  Chun-Chih Liao; Ya-Fang Chen; Furen Xiao
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2018-04-12

3.  Simulating Expansion of the Intracranial Space to Accommodate Brain Swelling after Decompressive Craniectomy: Volumetric Quantification in a 3D CAD Skull Model with Contour Elevation.

Authors:  Woon-Man Kung; Yao-Chin Wang; I-Shiang Tzeng; Yu-Te Chen; Muh-Shi Lin
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.