Literature DB >> 25583552

The neglected topic: presentation of cost information in patient decision AIDS.

J S Blumenthal-Barby1, Emily Robinson2, Scott B Cantor3, Aanand D Naik4, Heidi Voelker Russell5, Robert J Volk3.   

Abstract

Costs are an important component of patients' decision making, but a comparatively underemphasized aspect of formal shared decision making. We hypothesized that decision aids also avoid discussion of costs, despite their being tools designed to facilitate shared decision making about patient-centered outcomes. We sought to define the frequency of cost-related information and identify the common modes of presenting cost and cost-related information in the 290 decision aids catalogued in the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute's Decision Aid Library Inventory (DALI) system. We found that 56% (n = 161) of the decision aids mentioned cost in some way, but only 13% (n = 37) gave a specific price or range of prices. We identified 9 different ways in which cost was mentioned. The most common approach was as a "pro" of one of the treatment options (e.g., "you avoid the cost of medication"). Of the 37 decision aids that gave specific prices or ranges of prices for treatment options, only 2 were about surgery decisions despite the fact that surgery decision aids were the most common. Our findings suggest that presentation of cost information in decision aids is highly variable. Evidence-based guidelines should be developed by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  consumer issues; cost; decision aids; decision making; ethical issues; health economics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25583552     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X14564433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  13 in total

1.  Communication with Physicians about Health Care Costs: Survey of an Insured Population.

Authors:  Nora B Henrikson; Eva Chang; Kevin Ulrich; Deborah King; Melissa L Anderson
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017

2.  The Influence of Varying Cost Formats on Preferences.

Authors:  Charles Changchuan Jiang; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Presenting Cost and Efficiency Measures That Support Consumers to Make High-Value Health Care Choices.

Authors:  Jessica Greene; Rebecca M Sacks
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-25       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Unpacking cancer patients' preferences for information about their care.

Authors:  Erin M Ellis; Ashley Varner
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2017-11-21

5.  Nonclinical Factors Affecting Shared Decision Making.

Authors:  Grace L Smith; Robert J Volk
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  "It's a mess sometimes": patient perspectives on provider responses to healthcare costs, and how informatics interventions can help support cost-sensitive care decisions.

Authors:  Olivia K Richards; Bradley E Iott; Tammy R Toscos; Jessica A Pater; Shauna R Wagner; Tiffany C Veinot
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 7.942

7.  Using Shared Decision-Making Tools and Patient-Clinician Conversations About Costs.

Authors:  Nataly R Espinoza Suarez; Christina M LaVecchia; Oscar J Ponce; Karen M Fischer; Patrick M Wilson; Celia C Kamath; Annie LeBlanc; Victor M Montori; Juan P Brito
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-08-05

8.  Cancer cost communication: experiences and preferences of patients, caregivers, and oncologists-a nationwide triad study.

Authors:  So Young Kim; Dong Wook Shin; Boyoung Park; Juhee Cho; Jae Hwan Oh; Sun Seog Kweon; Hye Sook Han; Hyung Kook Yang; Keeho Park; Jong-Hyock Park
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Most Americans Do Not Believe That There Is An Association Between Health Care Prices And Quality Of Care.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; David Schleifer; Carolin Hagelskamp
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Competing priorities in treatment decision-making: a US national survey of individuals with depression and clinicians who treat depression.

Authors:  Paul J Barr; Rachel C Forcino; Manish Mishra; Rachel Blitzer; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.