Literature DB >> 25583531

4D DSA a new technique for arteriovenous malformation evaluation: a feasibility study.

Carolina Sandoval-Garcia1, Kevin Royalty2, Pengfei Yang3, David Niemann1, Azam Ahmed1, Beverly Aagaard-Kienitz1, Mustafa K Başkaya1, Sebastian Schafer4, Charles Strother5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The angioarchitectural features of an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) provide key information regarding natural history and treatment planning. Because of rapid filling and vascular overlap, two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) digital subtraction angiography (DSA) are often suboptimal for evaluation of these features. We have developed an algorithm that derives a series of fully time-resolved 3D DSA volumes (four-dimensional (4D) DSA) at up to 30 frames/s from a conventional 3D DSA. The temporal/spatial resolution of 4D reconstructions is significantly higher than that provided by current MR angiography and CT angiography techniques. 4D reconstruction allows viewing of an AVM from any angle at any time during its opacification. This feasibility study investigated the potential of 4D DSA to improve the ability to analyze angioarchitectural features compared with conventional 2D and 3D DSA.
METHODS: 2D, 3D, and 4D DSA reconstructions of angiographic studies of six AVMs were evaluated by three cerebrovascular neurosurgeons and one interventional neuroradiologist. These observers evaluated the ability of each modality to visualize the angioarchitectural features of the AVMs. They also compared the information provided using the combination of 2D and 3D DSA with that provided by a 4D DSA reconstruction.
RESULTS: By consensus, 4D DSA provided the best ability to visualize the internal features of the AVM including intranidal aneurysms, fistulae, venous obstructions, and sequence of filling and draining. 2D and 3D images in comparison were limited because of overlap of the vasculature.
CONCLUSIONS: In this small series, 4D DSA provided better ability to visualize the angioarchitecture of an AVM than conventional methods. Further experience is required to determine the ultimate utility of this technique. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiography; Arteriovenous Malformation; Technique; Vascular Malformation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25583531      PMCID: PMC4740248          DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Arteriovenous malformations of the brain.

Authors:  Robert M Friedlander
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Ultra-fast carotid CT-angiography: low versus standard volume contrast material protocol for a 128-slice CT-system.

Authors:  Fabian M Hinkmann; Heinz L Voit; Katharina Anders; Ulrich Baum; Peter Seidensticker; Werner A Bautz; Michael M Lell
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Sensitivity of CT angiography, T2-weighted MRI, and magnetic resonance angiography in detecting cerebral arteriovenous malformations and associated aneurysms.

Authors:  Bradley A Gross; Kai U Frerichs; Rose Du
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  Assessment of leptomeningeal collaterals using dynamic CT angiography in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Bijoy K Menon; Billy O'Brien; Andrew Bivard; Neil J Spratt; Andrew M Demchuk; Ferdinand Miteff; Xuewen Lu; Christopher Levi; Mark W Parsons
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  4D digital subtraction angiography: implementation and demonstration of feasibility.

Authors:  B Davis; K Royalty; M Kowarschik; C Rohkohl; E Oberstar; B Aagaard-Kienitz; D Niemann; O Ozkan; C Strother; C Mistretta
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Contrast-enhanced MR 3D angiography in the assessment of brain AVMs.

Authors:  Ercument Unlu; Osman Temizoz; Sait Albayram; Hakan Genchellac; M Kemal Hamamcioglu; Imran Kurt; M Kemal Demir
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 7.  Radiologic assessment of brain arteriovenous malformations: what clinicians need to know.

Authors:  Sasikhan Geibprasert; Sirintara Pongpech; Pakorn Jiarakongmun; Manohar M Shroff; Derek C Armstrong; Timo Krings
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Noncontrast dynamic MRA in intracranial arteriovenous malformation (AVM), comparison with time of flight (TOF) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Authors:  Songlin Yu; Lirong Yan; Yuqiang Yao; Shuo Wang; Mingqi Yang; Bo Wang; Yan Zhuo; Lin Ai; Xinyuan Miao; Jizong Zhao; Danny J J Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.546

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  4D DSA for Dynamic Visualization of Cerebral Vasculature: A Single-Center Experience in 26 Cases.

Authors:  S Lang; P Gölitz; T Struffert; J Rösch; K Rössler; M Kowarschik; C Strother; A Doerfler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Comparison of the Diagnostic Utility of 4D-DSA with Conventional 2D- and 3D-DSA in the Diagnosis of Cerebrovascular Abnormalities.

Authors:  C Sandoval-Garcia; P Yang; T Schubert; S Schafer; S Hetzel; A Ahmed; C Strother
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Time-resolved 3D Rotational Angiography (4D DSA) of the Lenticulostriate Arteries: Display of Normal Anatomic Variants and Collaterals in Cases with Chronic Obstruction of the MCA.

Authors:  S Kammerer; M Mueller-Eschner; J Berkefeld; S Tritt
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  4D Flat Panel Conebeam CTA for Analysis of the Angioarchitecture of Cerebral AVMs with a Novel Software Prototype.

Authors:  F Keil; A Bergkemper; A Birkhold; M Kowarschik; S Tritt; J Berkefeld
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Optimization of the Surgical Approach in AVMs Using MRI and 4D DSA Fusion Technique : A technical note.

Authors:  S Tritt; B Ommer; S Gehrisch; S Klein; V Seifert; J Berkefeld; J Konczalla
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  Volumetric limiting spatial resolution analysis of four-dimensional digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Brian J Davis; Erick Oberstar; Kevin Royalty; Sebastian Schafer; Charles Mistretta
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-01-25

Review 7.  4D-DSA: Development and Current Neurovascular Applications.

Authors:  K L Ruedinger; S Schafer; M A Speidel; C M Strother
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Relationship between Injection Rate and Contrast Enhancement on Three-dimensional Digital Subtraction Angiography of the Cerebral Arteries.

Authors:  Satoshi Takagi; Naoyuki Hanasaki
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.894

9.  Virtual 2D angiography from four-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (4D-DSA): A feasibility study.

Authors:  Jay F Yu; Leland Pung; Hataka Minami; Kerstin Mueller; Rajkamal Khangura; Robert Darflinger; Steven W Hetts; Daniel L Cooke
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 1.610

10.  Optimization of quantitative time-resolved 3D (4D) digital subtraction angiography in a porcine liver model.

Authors:  Ece Meram; Gabe Shaughnessy; Colin Longhurst; Carson Hoffman; Martin Wagner; Charles A Mistretta; Michael A Speidel; Paul F Laeseke
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-07-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.