Literature DB >> 25582774

Differential effects of estrogen-dependent transactivation vs. transrepression by the estrogen receptor on invasiveness of HER2 overexpressing breast cancer cells.

Mugdha Patki1, Marcela d'alincourt Salazar2, Robert Trumbly3, Manohar Ratnam4.   

Abstract

Estrogen (E2) supports breast cancer cell growth but suppresses invasiveness and both actions are antagonized by anti-estrogens. As a consequence, anti-estrogen treatment may increase the invasive potential of estrogen receptor (ER)+ tumor cell sub-populations that are endocrine resistant due to HER2 amplification. Either transactivation or transrepression by E2/ER could lead to both up- and down-regulation of many genes. Inhibition of the transactivation function of ER is adequate to inhibit E2-dependent growth. However, the impact of inhibiting E2-dependent transactivation vs. transrepression by ER on regulation of invasiveness by E2 is less clear. Here we dissect the roles of ER-mediated transactivation and transrepression in the regulation of invasiveness of ER+/HER2+ breast cancer cells by E2. Knocking down the general ER co-activators CBP and p300 prevented activation by E2 of its classical target genes but did not interfere with the ability of E2 to repress its direct target genes known to support invasiveness and tumor progression; there was also no effect on invasiveness or the ability of E2 to regulate invasiveness. On the other hand, overexpression of a co-repressor binding site mutant of ER (L372R) prevented E2-dependent transrepression but not transactivation. The mutant ER abrogated the ability of E2 to suppress invasiveness. E2 can partially down-regulate HER2 but knocking down HER2 below E2-regulated levels did not affect invasiveness or the ability of E2 to regulate invasiveness, although it did inhibit growth. Therefore, in ER+/HER2+ cells, the E2-dependent transrepression by ER rather than its transactivation function is critical for regulation of invasiveness and this is independent of HER2 regulation by E2. The findings suggest that selective inhibitors of transactivation by ER may be more beneficial in reducing tumor progression than conventional anti-estrogens that also antagonize E2-dependent transrepression.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-estrogens; Breast cancer; Estrogen receptor; HER2; Invasiveness; Tamoxifen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25582774      PMCID: PMC4334377          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  30 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance.

Authors:  Alistair Ring; Mitch Dowsett
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 2.  Estrogens and breast cancer.

Authors:  H S Feigelson; B E Henderson
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.944

3.  Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Overexpression of the c-erbB-2 gene enhanced intrinsic metastasis potential in human breast cancer cells without increasing their transformation abilities.

Authors:  M Tan; J Yao; D Yu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Her-2 overexpression increases the metastatic outgrowth of breast cancer cells in the brain.

Authors:  Diane Palmieri; Julie L Bronder; Jeanne M Herring; Toshiyuki Yoneda; Robert J Weil; Andreas M Stark; Raffael Kurek; Eleazar Vega-Valle; Lionel Feigenbaum; Douglas Halverson; Alexander O Vortmeyer; Seth M Steinberg; Kenneth Aldape; Patricia S Steeg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Drug resistance and the solid tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Olivier Trédan; Carlos M Galmarini; Krupa Patel; Ian F Tannock
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Estrogen receptor mediated inhibition of cancer cell invasion and motility: an overview.

Authors:  H Rochefort; N Platet; Y Hayashido; D Derocq; A Lucas; S Cunat; M Garcia
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 8.  Estrogen signaling: a subtle balance between ER alpha and ER beta.

Authors:  Jason Matthews; Jan-Ake Gustafsson
Journal:  Mol Interv       Date:  2003-08

9.  Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisa K Dunnwald; Mary Anne Rossing; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 10.  First-line endocrine treatment of breast cancer: aromatase inhibitor or antioestrogen?

Authors:  Z-W Wong; M J Ellis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Hybrid Enzalutamide Derivatives with Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Activity Decrease Heat Shock Protein 90 and Androgen Receptor Levels and Inhibit Viability in Enzalutamide-Resistant C4-2 Prostate Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Rayna Rosati; Bailing Chen; Mugdha Patki; Thomas McFall; Siyu Ou; Elisabeth Heath; Manohar Ratnam; Zhihui Qin
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.436

2.  Role of the short isoform of the progesterone receptor in breast cancer cell invasiveness at estrogen and progesterone levels in the pre- and post-menopausal ranges.

Authors:  Thomas McFall; Mugdha Patki; Rayna Rosati; Manohar Ratnam
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-20

3.  Aloe-emodin inhibits HER-2 expression through the downregulation of Y-box binding protein-1 in HER-2-overexpressing human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Jui-Wen Ma; Chao-Ming Hung; Ying-Chao Lin; Chi-Tang Ho; Jung-Yie Kao; Tzong-Der Way
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.