| Literature DB >> 25582724 |
Diane Dufour-Rainfray1, Valérie Moal2, Lucie Cloix3, Elisabeth Mathieu2, Anne-Sophie Gauchez4, Julie Brossaud5, Jean-Benoît Corcuff5, François Fraissinet6, Christine Collet7, Florence Boux de Casson2, Denis Guilloteau1, Patrick Emond1, Pascal Reynier2.
Abstract
Steroid hormone measurement, first developed with radioimmunoassay, is now becoming easier with the use of automated platforms of immunoassay. However, some hormones remain uneasily detectable because of their low blood concentration, their structural homology or the presence of interferences. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) can be considered as an alternative to immunoassays. This approach allows the simultaneous determination of several parameters thanks to its selectivity led by the detector mass spectrometer and the separate dimension of chromatography liquid. In addition, recourse to UHPLC (ultra high performance liquid chromatography) allows improving selectivity and sensitivity while limiting the samples volumes. The "ready-to-use" kits are now available and added to the "homemade" techniques developed by laboratories, thus giving opportunity for measurement of a wide steroid panel with only one sample. Finally, mass spectrometry methods, including a prior extraction step, allow the use of varied biological fluids (blood, urine, saliva…). Also, several clinical indications could gain from mass spectrometry, especially when hormone levels are low, when several steroids have to be identified, when the sample volume is low. However, this technology represents an important financial investment and in-depth staff training. In addition, some steroids are not easily quantifiable by mass spectrometry. It is likely by immunoassay and mass spectrometry, well-matched technologies, that we could answer the best to clinical questions about steroids.Entities:
Keywords: 11-deoxycortisol; 17-hydroxyprogesterone; LC-MS/MS; cortisol; testosterone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25582724 DOI: 10.1684/abc.2014.0988
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ISSN: 0003-3898 Impact factor: 0.459