| Literature DB >> 25582547 |
Jui-Kun Chiang1,2, Chi-Ling Chen3,4, Feng-Yu Tseng5, Yu-Chiao Chi6, Kuo-Chin Huang7, Wei-Shiung Yang8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypoadiponectinemia is a well-known state associated with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and insulin resistance (IR). Recently aldosterone has been highly associated with high blood pressure, and may thus be a possible biomarker for MetS and IR. In this study, we investigate the association of aldosterone with MetS and IR, and compare it with that of adiponectin.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25582547 PMCID: PMC4302513 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-015-0175-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Basic characteristics of the 556 women and their correlations with adiponectin and aldosterone
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 54.4 ± 9.8 | 0.09 |
| −0.06 | 0.195 |
|
| 155.4 ± 5.6 | −0.01 | 0.805 | −0.04 | 0.918 |
|
| 55.7 ± 7.8 | −0.25 | <0.001 | 0.07 | 0.105 |
|
| 23.0 ± 3.1 | −0.25 |
| 0.07 | 0.081 |
|
| 72.8 ± 7.2 | −0.27 |
| 0.04 | 0.410 |
|
| 29.0 ± 5.9 | −0.29 |
| 0.19 |
|
|
| 123.3 ± 19.7 | 0.06 | 0.155 | 0.02 | 0.680 |
|
| 71.0 ± 11.3 | 0.09 | 0.839 | 0.07 | 0.128 |
|
| 5.0 ± 1.0 | −0.15 |
| 0.20 |
|
|
| 6.3 ± 5.2 | −0.10 |
| 0.09 |
|
|
| 1.4 ± 1.3 | −0.13 |
| 0.15 |
|
|
| 1.2 ± 0.7 | −0.25 |
| 0.09 |
|
|
| 4.8 ± 0.9 | 0.04 | 0.365 | 0.13 |
|
|
| 3.1 ± 0.8 | −0.07 | 0.115 | 0.11 |
|
|
| 1.5 ± 0.4 | 0.41 |
| −0.03 | 0.462 |
|
| 4.6 ± 1.5 | 0.04 | 0.389 | 0.12 |
|
|
| 52.1 ± 14.1 | 0.05 | 0.246 | 0.19 |
|
|
| 279.6 ± 71.4 | −0.13 |
| 0.14 |
|
|
| 11.0 ± 4.9 | - | - | −0.11 |
|
|
| 577.0 ± 280.2 | −0.11 |
| - | - |
Abbreviations: BMI Body mass index, SBP Systolic blood pressure, DBP Diastolic blood pressure, AC glucose Fasting plasma glucose, fasting insulin Fasting serum insulin, HOMA-IR Insulin resistance index by homeostasis assessment model, mM mmol/L, TG Triglycerides, T-Chol Total cholesterol, LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, BUN Blood urea nitrogen, CRE Creatinine, UA Uric acid. Those p values < 0.05 were in bold form.
The adiponectin and aldosterone levels in 556 women belong to various groups
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8.9 ± 0.5 | 11.4 ± 0.2 |
| 535 ± 28 | 585 ± 14 | 0.141 |
|
|
| 9.9 ± 0.3 | 11.8 ± 0.2 |
| 616 ± 22 | 555 ± 14 |
|
|
|
| 8.6 ± 0.5 | 11.4 ± 0.2 |
| 671 ± 58 | 566 ± 11 |
|
|
|
| 11.1 ± 0.4 | 11.0 ± 0.3 | 0.990 | 605 ± 22 | 560 ± 14 | 0.096 |
|
|
| 9.0 ± 0.4 | 11.4 ± 0.2 |
| 644 ± 33 | 566 ± 14 |
|
|
|
| 8.9 ± 0.3 | 12.1 ± 0.3 |
| 602 ± 25 | 566 ± 14 | 0.219 |
|
|
| 10.4 ± 0.5 | 11.3 ± 0.2 |
| 635 ± 31 | 560 ± 11 |
|
|
|
| 8.1 ± 0.4 | 11.5 ± 0.2 |
| 691 ± 50 | 560 ± 11 |
|
*The abbreviations are the same as those in Table 1.
*The values were expressed as Means ± SEM. *Those p values < 0.05 were in bold form.
*Two missing for FAT % and one missing for HOMA-IR.
*IFG: impaired fasting glucose: AC glucose ≥ 5.55 mM.
*Insulin resistance was defined as HOMA-IR > higher quartile (1.864 in our study).
Figure 1The blood (A) adiponectin levels (Mean ± SEM) and (B) aldosterone levels (Mean ± SEM) in subjects with or without MetS or by the number of the MetS criteria met.
Multiple linear regression analyses of the association of adiponectin and aldosterone using the stepwise variable selection procedure
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.445 ± 0.106 |
| −7.542 ± 2.218 |
|
|
| −1.418 ± 0.283 |
| - |
|
|
| - |
| 14.329 ± 3.702 |
|
|
| 0.236 ± 0.103 |
| - | - |
|
| −1.812 ± 0.597 |
| - |
|
|
| - | - | 0.487 ± 0.124 |
|
|
| 4.512 ± 0.505 |
| - |
|
|
| - | - | 0.039 ± 0.008 |
|
|
| - | - | −0.019 ± 0.025 | 0.436 |
|
| −0.124 ± .0.065 |
| - |
|
|
| 0.239 | 0.104 | ||
The abbreviations are the same as those in Table 1. Those p values < 0.05 were in bold form.