| Literature DB >> 25582089 |
Esther Lai-Har Tang1, Jayakumar Rajarajeswaran1, ShinYee Fung1, M S Kanthimathi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Petroselinum crispum (English parsley) is a common herb of the Apiaceae family that is cultivated throughout the world and is widely used as a seasoning condiment. Studies have shown its potential as a medicinal herb. In this study, P. crispum leaf and stem extracts were evaluated for their antioxidant properties, protection against DNA damage in normal 3T3-L1 cells, and the inhibition of proliferation and migration of the MCF-7 cells.Entities:
Keywords: DNA protection; MCF-7 cell migration; Petroselinum crispum; antioxidant activity; antiproliferative activity; hydrogen peroxide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25582089 PMCID: PMC5024025 DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.7078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Sci Food Agric ISSN: 0022-5142 Impact factor: 3.638
Phenolic content, ferric reducing antioxidant power and DPPH radical scavenging activity of Petroselinum crispum extracts
|
| Total phenolic content (mg GAE g−1) | FRAP value (mmol g−1) | DPPH radical scavenging activity (µg mL−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hexane | 20.17 ± 1.35b | 0.075 ± 0.002b | 4485.0 ± 78.0b |
| Dichloromethane | 42.31 ± 0.50d | 0.360 ± 0.009d | 3310.0 ± 80.5a |
| Ethyl acetate | 32.17 ± 2.24c | 0.139 ± 0.006c | 4712.0 ± 87.0c |
| Methanol | 24.77 ± 1.24b | 0.027 ± 0.004a | ND |
| Aqueous | 9.63 ± 2.60a | 0.014 ± 0.003a | ND |
| Positive control | |||
| Rutin | 649.93 ± 13.34 | 1.789 ± 0.214 | 42.7 ± 2.3 |
| Quercetin | 1275.62 ± 56.03 | 14.444 ± 0.934 | 22.2 ± 0.9 |
Results are presented as means ± SD (n = 3).
IC50 values are presented for the DPPH radical scavenging activity.
Values within the same column with different letters (a–d) are significantly different at P < 0.05 from the different extracts. ND, not detected.
Correlation analysis of total phenolic content with antioxidant activities of Petroselinum crispum extracts
| Pearson correlation ( | ||
|---|---|---|
| Plant | TPC/FRAP | TPC/DPPH |
|
| 0.875 | 0.910 |
TPC, total phenolic content; FRAP, ferric reducing antioxidant power; DPPH, 1,1‐diphenyl‐2‐picryl hydrazyl radical scavenging activity.
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.
Figure 1Anti‐proliferative activities of Petroselinum crispum extracts on cancer cell lines, MCF‐7, MDA‐MB‐231 and HT‐29. Results are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Values within the same cell line with different letters (a–c) are significantly different at P < 0.05 from the different extracts. Extract concentration tested: 0–500 µg mL−1.
Protection from H2O2‐induced DNA damage in 3 T3‐L1 fibroblasts pre‐treated with Petroselinum crispum extract
|
| DNA protection (%) |
|---|---|
| 100 | 19.0 ± 6.1 |
| 200 | 23.1 ± 6.9 |
| 300 | 37.9 ± 7.8 |
| 400 | 50.9 ± 6.6 |
Results are presented as means ± SD (n = 3).
P < 0.05 compared to control (without extract treatment), as tested by Student's t‐test.
Figure 2Effect of Petroselinum crispum dichloromethane extract on the inhibition of H2O2‐induced MCF‐7 cell migration in a denuded area using the scratch motility assay. (A) Photographs of cell migration (a) in untreated cells and (b) in cells treated with P. crispum dichloromethane extract at 200 µg mL−1, (c) 300 µg mL−1, (d) 400 µg mL−1, (e) 500 µg mL−1 and (f) 600 µg mL−1 after 24 h. (B) Percentage inhibition presented as means ± SD (n = 3). Asterisk represents * P < 0.05 compared to the control (without extract) as tested by Student's t‐test.
Figure 3Trypan blue exclusion assay of MCF‐7 cells treated with Petroselinum crispum dichloromethane extract. The results are presented as the number of viable cells counted per well and the percent of viable cells relative to untreated control. The viability of untreated control cells was taken as 100%. Results are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). * P < 0.05 compared to the control (without extract) as tested by Student's t‐test.
Figure 4Electrophoresis of DNA extracted from MCF‐7 cells after treatment with Petroselinum crispum dichloromethane extract. M1: 1 kb DNA ladder; lane 1: DNA from cells of control; lane 2: DNA treated with 500 µg mL−1 extract for 24 h; lane 3: DNA treated with 800 µg mL−1 extract for 24 h; lane 4: DNA treated with 500 µg mL−1 extract for 48 h; lane 5: DNA treated with 800 µg mL−1 extract for 48 h; M2: 100 bp DNA ladder.