Literature DB >> 25582058

Alumina reinforced zirconia implants: effects of cyclic loading and abutment modification on fracture resistance.

Benedikt Christopher Spies1, Carmen Sauter2, Martin Wolkewitz3, Ralf-Joachim Kohal4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the thermomechanical behavior of alumina-toughened zirconia (ATZ) oral implants in the artificial mouth and the fracture resistance (fracture load and bending moment) in a subsequent static fracture load test. The effects of abutment modification and different cyclic loadings were evaluated.
METHODS: A total of 48 implants were used. 24 implants were left as machined (Group A), and 24 implants were shape modified at the abutment (Group B). Groups were divided into three subgroups composed of 8 samples each (A1/B1: no cyclic loading; A2/B2: 1.2 million cycles; A3/B3: 5 million cycles). Subsequently, all implants were statically loaded to the point of fracture.
RESULTS: The implants showed the following survival rates after the artificial mouth: A2 and B2 100%; A3 and B3 87.5%. The following average fracture resistance values were found (fracture load [N]/bending moment [Nmm]): A1 (583/2907), B1 (516/2825), A2 (618/2737), B2 (550/3150), A3 (802/3784) and B3 (722/3809). After 5 million loading cycles a significant increase in fracture load and bending moment was found. Modification of the abutment significantly decreased the fracture load of implants without foregoing dynamic loading. However, the shape modification altered the lever arm. For that reason, a smaller load resulted in the same bending moment. Therefore, abutment modification had no significant influence on the fracture resistance of ATZ. SIGNIFICANCE: Neither thermomechanical cycling in an aqueous environment nor modification of the abutment had a negative effect on the fracture resistance of ATZ.
Copyright © 2014 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATZ; Abutment modification; Alumina reinforced; Bending moment; Fracture load; Zirconia implants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25582058     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  4 in total

Review 1.  A Review on Biomaterials for Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology: From Past to Present.

Authors:  Grzegorz Szczęsny; Mateusz Kopec; Denis J Politis; Zbigniew L Kowalewski; Adam Łazarski; Tomasz Szolc
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  A Novel Zirconia-Based Composite Presents an Aging Resistant Material for Narrow-Diameter Ceramic Implants.

Authors:  Felix Burkhardt; Markus Harlass; Erik Adolfsson; Kirstin Vach; Benedikt Christopher Spies; Ralf-Joachim Kohal
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  All-Ceramic Single Crown Restauration of Zirconia Oral Implants and Its Influence on Fracture Resistance: An Investigation in the Artificial Mouth.

Authors:  Ralf-Joachim Kohal; Jolanta Bernadette Kilian; Susanne Stampf; Benedikt Christopher Spies
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 4.  Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Oral Implants In Vitro: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Annalena Bethke; Stefano Pieralli; Ralf-Joachim Kohal; Felix Burkhardt; Manja von Stein-Lausnitz; Kirstin Vach; Benedikt Christopher Spies
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.